跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

appfolio-rate-limits

Control AppFolio API request rates and retries during bulk synchronization. Use endpoint limits, server-specified waits, saved progress, and duplicate-write protection to determine when batches should resume, pause, or require operator review.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Handle AppFolio API rate limits with throttling and backoff. Trigger: "appfolio rate limit".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Handling 429 errors during bulk synchronization
  • Controlling request rates for nightly portfolio syncs
  • Preventing duplicate writes after a lost response
  • Pausing and resuming interrupted batches

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

AppFolio Rate Limits

Overview

AppFolio's Stack API enforces per-partner rate limits to protect shared property management infrastructure. High-volume operations like bulk tenant imports, rent-roll syncs, and work-order batch updates can quickly exhaust quotas. Property managers running nightly portfolio syncs across hundreds of units must throttle carefully, especially during month-end when lease renewals and payment processing spike concurrently.

Prerequisites

  • A verified per-endpoint limit from the current AppFolio partner contract or response headers; do not rely on a generic rate value for tenant writes.
  • Persisted batch cursors, idempotency keys for every write, and an operator policy for pausing month-end or other safety-sensitive workloads.
  • A staging fixture and request-budget owner who can prove retries, 429 behavior, and unknown-write handling without touching production tenants.

Instructions

  1. Select the limiter ceiling for the specific endpoint and keep concurrency below the smallest applicable portfolio or partner limit.
  2. Acquire a token before each request, honor Retry-After, and cap retries with jitter for transient provider failures.
  3. Process writes from a persisted cursor with idempotency keys; never replay a tenant create just because the response was lost.
  4. Pause and escalate batches that exhaust the retry budget, hit a maintenance window, or have an unknown write outcome.

Rate Limit Reference

EndpointLimitWindowScope
Properties list/get120 req1 minutePer partner key
Tenant create/update30 req1 minutePer partner key
Work orders60 req1 minutePer partner key
Bulk data export5 req1 hourPer partner key
Webhooks registration10 req1 minutePer partner key

Rate Limiter Implementation

class AppFolioRateLimiter {
  private tokens: number;
  private lastRefill: number;
  private readonly maxTokens: number;
  private readonly refillRate: number; // tokens per ms

  constructor(maxPerMinute: number) {
    this.maxTokens = maxPerMinute;
    this.tokens = maxPerMinute;
    this.lastRefill = Date.now();
    this.refillRate = maxPerMinute / 60_000;
  }

  async acquire(): Promise<void> {
    for (;;) {
      this.refill();
      if (this.tokens >= 1) {
        this.tokens -= 1;
        return;
      }
      // Wait until the next token is available; no later request is needed to
      // wake this caller.
      const waitMs = Math.max(1, Math.ceil((1 - this.tokens) / this.refillRate));
      await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, waitMs));
    }
  }

  private refill() {
    const now = Date.now();
    this.tokens = Math.min(this.maxTokens, this.tokens + (now - this.lastRefill) * this.refillRate);
    this.lastRefill = now;
  }
}

const limiter = new AppFolioRateLimiter(25); // configure per endpoint contract

Retry Strategy

async function appfolioRetry<T>(fn: () => Promise<Response>, maxRetries = 4): Promise<T> {
  for (let attempt = 0; attempt <= maxRetries; attempt++) {
    await limiter.acquire();
    const res = await fn();
    if (res.ok) return res.json();
    if (res.status === 429) {
      const retryAfter = parseInt(res.headers.get("Retry-After") || "10", 10);
      const delay = retryAfter * 1000 + Math.random() * 2000;
      await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, delay));
      continue;
    }
    if (res.status >= 500 && attempt < maxRetries) {
      await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, Math.pow(2, attempt) * 1000));
      continue;
    }
    throw new Error(`AppFolio API ${res.status}: ${await res.text()}`);
  }
  throw new Error("Max retries exceeded");
}

Batch Processing

async function batchSyncTenants(tenants: any[], batchSize = 25) {
  const results: any[] = [];
  for (let i = 0; i < tenants.length; i += batchSize) {
    const batch = tenants.slice(i, i + batchSize);
    const batchResults = await Promise.all(
      batch.map(t => appfolioRetry(() =>
        fetch(`${BASE}/api/v1/tenants`, {
          method: "POST", headers, body: JSON.stringify(t),
        })
      ))
    );
    results.push(...batchResults);
    if (i + batchSize < tenants.length) await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 2000));
  }
  return results;
}

Error Handling

IssueCauseFix
429 Too Many RequestsExceeded partner rate limitBackoff using Retry-After header
403 on bulk exportHourly export cap reachedQueue exports with 15-min spacing
Timeout on property listLarge portfolio (500+ units)Paginate with per_page=50
409 Conflict on tenant updateConcurrent write to same tenantRetry with fresh ETag
503 during maintenanceScheduled nightly window (2-4 AM PT)Skip requests, retry after window

Output

  • A self-scheduling, endpoint-specific limiter that cannot strand queued work
  • Bounded retry outcomes with Retry-After evidence and redacted failure data
  • A persisted batch decision: completed, paused for later retry, or quarantined for operator reconciliation

Examples

For a sandbox tenant-update batch, set the limiter below the documented tenant write ceiling, process one record at a time with idempotency keys, and preserve the cursor after each confirmed result. Induce a 429 to prove that callers wait and resume without an additional request, then induce a lost response to prove the record is quarantined rather than blindly replayed. If rate headers conflict with the configured ceiling, retries exhaust, or maintenance starts, pause the batch and hand the cursor to the owner.

Resources

Next Steps

See appfolio-performance-tuning.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题