跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

archiving-databases

Build recurring database archival pipelines that move historical records into archive tables or cloud storage. Define retention criteria, verify batches before deleting source records, track archived files, and prepare retrieval procedures for later access.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Process use when you need to archive historical database records to reduce primary database size. This skill automates moving old data to archive tables or cold storage (S3, Azure Blob, GCS). Trigger with phrases like "archive old database records", "implement data retention policy", "move historical data to cold storage", or "reduce database size with archival".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Move old logs and orders out of primary tables
  • Archive records according to retention rules
  • Store historical data in cloud storage
  • Prepare retrieval procedures and recurring archive jobs

包含的文件(5)

  • SKILL.md8.0 KB
  • assets/README.md247 B
  • references/README.md67 B
  • scripts/archival/README.md103 B
  • scripts/README.md476 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Database Archival System

Overview

Implement automated data archival pipelines that move historical records from primary database tables to archive storage (archive tables, S3, Azure Blob, or GCS) based on age, status, or access frequency criteria.

Prerequisites

  • Database credentials with SELECT, INSERT, and DELETE permissions on source and archive tables
  • Cloud storage credentials (AWS S3, Azure Blob, or GCS) if archiving to cold storage
  • psql or mysql CLI for executing archival queries
  • aws s3, az storage, or gsutil CLI for cloud storage uploads
  • Understanding of data retention requirements and compliance policies (GDPR, HIPAA, SOX)
  • Current table sizes: SELECT pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size('table_name')) to identify archival candidates

Instructions

  1. Identify archival candidates by finding large tables with time-based data:

    • SELECT relname, n_live_tup, pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size(relid)) FROM pg_stat_user_tables ORDER BY pg_total_relation_size(relid) DESC LIMIT 10
    • Focus on tables where historical data is rarely queried: logs, audit trails, events, old orders, expired sessions
  2. Define archival criteria for each table:

    • Age-based: Records older than N days/months (WHERE created_at < NOW() - INTERVAL '1 year')
    • Status-based: Records in terminal state (WHERE status IN ('completed', 'cancelled', 'expired'))
    • Combined: Old AND terminal (WHERE created_at < NOW() - INTERVAL '6 months' AND status = 'completed')
    • Calculate the expected volume: SELECT COUNT(*), pg_size_pretty(pg_column_size(t.*)) FROM table_name t WHERE <criteria>
  3. Handle referential integrity by archiving in dependency order:

    • Archive child records first (order_items before orders)
    • For tables with active foreign key references, verify no active records reference the candidates: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM active_child WHERE parent_id IN (SELECT id FROM parent WHERE <archive_criteria>)
    • Option: cascade archive by archiving parent and all descendants together
  4. Create archive destination tables matching the source schema plus metadata columns:

    • CREATE TABLE orders_archive (LIKE orders INCLUDING ALL)
    • ALTER TABLE orders_archive ADD COLUMN archived_at TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT NOW()
    • ALTER TABLE orders_archive ADD COLUMN archive_batch_id UUID
    • Remove foreign key constraints on archive tables (archived data is self-contained)
  5. Implement the archival operation as an atomic batch:

    • Generate a batch ID: SELECT gen_random_uuid() AS batch_id
    • Insert into archive: INSERT INTO orders_archive SELECT *, NOW(), batch_id FROM orders WHERE <criteria>
    • Verify row counts match: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders_archive WHERE archive_batch_id = batch_id
    • Delete from source only after verification: DELETE FROM orders WHERE id IN (SELECT id FROM orders_archive WHERE archive_batch_id = batch_id)
    • Wrap in a transaction for atomicity
  6. For cloud storage archival, export data to files before upload:

    • PostgreSQL: COPY (SELECT * FROM orders WHERE <criteria>) TO '/tmp/archive_orders_2023.csv' WITH CSV HEADER
    • Compress: gzip /tmp/archive_orders_2023.csv
    • Upload: aws s3 cp /tmp/archive_orders_2023.csv.gz s3://archive-bucket/orders/2023/ --sse aws:kms
    • Store manifest: record file path, row count, checksum, and date range in an archive_manifest table
  7. Process archival in batches to avoid long-running transactions and excessive lock time:

    • Archive 10,000-50,000 rows per batch
    • Add a short delay between batches (100-500ms) to allow other transactions to proceed
    • Log progress after each batch for monitoring and restart capability
  8. Run VACUUM ANALYZE on source tables after archival to reclaim disk space and update statistics. For large archival operations (>30% of table), consider VACUUM FULL during a maintenance window (requires exclusive lock).

  9. Implement data retrieval procedures for archived data:

    • For archive tables: direct SQL queries with UNION ALL between active and archive tables
    • For cloud storage: import script that restores specific date ranges from S3/GCS to temporary tables
    • Document retrieval procedures for support and compliance teams
  10. Schedule recurring archival with a cron job or database scheduler. Run weekly or monthly. Include monitoring that alerts on: archival job failure, unexpected archive volume (too many or too few records), and source table size not decreasing after archival.

Output

  • Archive table DDL with matching schema plus metadata columns
  • Archival scripts (SQL and shell) for batch extraction, verification, and deletion
  • Cloud storage upload scripts with compression and encryption
  • Archive manifest table tracking all archival batches with metadata
  • Retrieval scripts for restoring archived data when needed
  • Cron job configuration for scheduled recurring archival

Error Handling

ErrorCauseSolution
Foreign key violation during DELETEActive child records still reference archived parentArchive child records first; verify no active references exist before deleting parent records
Disk space not reclaimed after archivalPostgreSQL marks deleted rows as dead tuples but does not release spaceRun VACUUM FULL table_name during maintenance window; or use pg_repack for online space reclamation
Archive batch interrupted mid-transactionNetwork failure, timeout, or crash during archivalTransaction rollback ensures atomicity; restart from the last completed batch using batch_id tracking
Cloud storage upload failsNetwork timeout, credential expiration, or bucket permissionsImplement retry with exponential backoff; verify credentials before starting; use multipart upload for files >100MB
Archived data needed for auditCompliance request requires access to archived recordsQuery archive tables directly; or restore from cloud storage using the archive manifest to locate the correct files

Examples

Archiving 2 years of completed orders to reduce database size by 60%: An orders table with 50M rows (120GB) contains 30M completed orders older than 1 year. Archival moves these to orders_archive in batches of 50,000 rows over 3 hours during off-peak. Source table drops to 20M rows (48GB). VACUUM reclaims 72GB. Query performance on active orders improves by 40%.

Tiered archival to S3 with Parquet format: Orders 6-12 months old move to archive tables (warm tier, queryable via SQL). Orders older than 12 months export to S3 as Parquet files (cold tier, retrievable on request). Parquet format reduces storage costs by 80% compared to CSV. Archive manifest tracks 156 Parquet files across 36 monthly partitions.

GDPR-compliant data retention with automatic purging: Archival script moves user data older than 3 years to archive tables. A separate purge job permanently deletes archive records older than 7 years. Both jobs log actions to an immutable audit trail. Monthly compliance report shows record counts by age tier and confirms purge completion.

Resources

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题