跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

attio-reference-architecture

Design a production Attio integration from existing repository code. Plan workspace-specific credentials, queued writes, verified event notifications, duplicate handling, and data reconciliation, then document component ownership, rollout steps, and rollback procedures.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Design a production Attio integration architecture with tenant-bound credentials, schema discovery, queued writes, verified webhooks, idempotency, reconciliation, and rollback ownership. Use when planning or reviewing a multi-workspace Attio service. Trigger with "Attio architecture", "design Attio integration", or "Attio system design".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Designing an Attio service for multiple workspaces
  • Reviewing credential and access separation
  • Planning reliable record sync and webhook processing
  • Defining rollout, rollback, and recovery responsibilities

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • references/official-docs.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Attio Integration Reference Architecture

Overview

This skill produces a repo-grounded architecture for reliable Attio reads, writes, and events. It treats tenant isolation, duplicate delivery, schema evolution, and reconciliation as first-class controls.

Prerequisites

  • Workspace and tenancy model
  • Required objects, lists, attributes, records, entries, and events
  • Availability, freshness, recovery, and retention objectives
  • Owners for credentials, queues, data mapping, and incident response

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to map components, trust boundaries, state, and existing clients. Use WebFetch only for current official Attio contracts. Use Write or Edit after the architecture, ownership, and approval boundaries are agreed.

Current Contract

  • Use OAuth for multi-workspace applications and a workspace key only for a controlled single-workspace integration.
  • Discover object and attribute identifiers rather than hard-coding display labels.
  • Pagination differs by endpoint, and record or entry queries can carry score-based rate cost.
  • Webhooks are at-least-once signals; durable processing needs signature verification, idempotency, a queue, and reconciliation.

Authentication

Place a tenant credential resolver behind a server-side interface. Bind each encrypted token to one workspace identity and exact scopes; never accept a workspace identifier from a caller without authorization.

Instructions

  1. Map ingress, egress, data stores, trust boundaries, tenant context, and failure domains from the repository.
  2. Define a credential resolver and auditable endpoint-to-scope map.
  3. Add a bounded schema registry or cache with explicit refresh and invalidation.
  4. Route outbound mutations through idempotent jobs with separate read and write governors.
  5. Terminate webhooks at an HTTPS receiver that verifies the raw body, deduplicates by idempotency key, acknowledges quickly, and queues work.
  6. Add replay, dead-letter handling, periodic reconciliation, and operator-visible lag metrics.
  7. Specify deployment order, canary cohort, rollback, recovery exercise, and component owners.

Approval Boundaries

Do not broaden data collection, scopes, retention, tenant access, or mutation authority without approval from the relevant data and service owners.

Output

Return a component-and-data-flow design, trust boundaries, endpoint contracts, failure controls, ownership matrix, rollout sequence, and rollback plan.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Tenant cannot be resolved safelyReject the operation before credential lookup.
Schema cache is staleRefresh discovery and pause incompatible writes.
Webhook queue is unavailableFail closed so Attio can retry; preserve observability.
Reconciliation finds driftQuarantine conflicting mutations and assign an owner.

Examples

Input:

tenancy=multi-workspace; flows=record sync and webhooks; recovery=required

Expected handoff:

auth=oauth resolver; writes=queued; webhooks=verified; reconciliation=scheduled

Resources

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题