跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

attio-security-basics

Review an Attio integration’s access, tenant boundaries, logs, and webhook handling. The skill identifies security gaps around credential scope, secret rotation, signature checks, and duplicate event processing, then returns findings and remediation owners.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Harden an Attio integration with least-privilege credentials, tenant isolation, log redaction, raw-body webhook verification, idempotency, and incident-ready rotation. Use when reviewing Attio security controls or preparing production access. Trigger with "Attio security", "secure Attio integration", or "Attio webhook signature".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Review security controls before production access
  • Check credential scopes and tenant isolation
  • Inspect webhook signature verification and deduplication
  • Prepare secret rotation and incident response

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • references/official-docs.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Attio Integration Security Baseline

Overview

This skill audits and hardens Attio authentication, data handling, webhook verification, tenant boundaries, and operational response without exposing secrets or customer records.

Prerequisites

  • Data-flow and trust-boundary inventory
  • Endpoint-to-scope map and tenant model
  • Secret-store, logging, retention, and incident-response owners
  • Webhook receiver code when events are enabled

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect credential flow, authorization, logs, storage, and webhook handling. Use WebFetch only for current official Attio security contracts. Use Write or Edit after findings, target controls, and rollback conditions are approved.

Current Contract

  • Tokens should be least-privilege, stored server-side, tenant-bound, redacted, and rotatable.
  • Verify Attio-Signature by computing SHA-256 HMAC over the exact raw UTF-8 request body with the webhook secret and comparing equal-length hexadecimal values in constant time.
  • The signature input is the raw body only; do not invent a timestamp concatenation protocol.
  • Delivery is at least once. Use Idempotency-Key and durable state to control duplicates; signature verification alone is not deduplication.

Authentication

Prefer OAuth for multi-workspace applications and a workspace key for a controlled single workspace. Enforce server-side workspace authorization before resolving the encrypted token.

Instructions

  1. Map secrets, tenant context, Attio data, logs, queues, backups, and administrative paths.
  2. Compare used endpoints with granted scopes and remove unjustified privilege through an approved rotation.
  3. Enforce tenant authorization before credential resolution and storage access.
  4. Redact authorization headers, secrets, raw customer payloads, and sensitive attribute values from telemetry.
  5. Preserve the raw webhook body, verify its HMAC before parsing, compare equal-length buffers safely, and reject failures.
  6. Deduplicate accepted events by Idempotency-Key, queue work, and reconcile downstream state.
  7. Exercise token revocation, webhook-secret rotation, audit review, and incident rollback.

Approval Boundaries

Do not rotate production secrets, reduce retention, change access scopes, or replay customer mutations without the responsible security and service owners.

Output

Return the threat boundaries, scope gaps, secret lifecycle, webhook verification evidence, redaction tests, tenant-isolation tests, and remediation owners.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Raw webhook body is unavailableReject the event and fix middleware ordering.
Signature lengths differReject before constant-time comparison.
Token appears in retained outputRevoke or rotate it and scrub the artifact.
Duplicate idempotency key arrivesAcknowledge without repeating committed work.

Examples

Input:

scope=oauth service plus webhook receiver; environment=production candidate

Expected handoff:

least-privilege=verified; hmac=raw-body; dedupe=durable; rotation=exercised

Resources

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28692026年10月25日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题