跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

attio-upgrade-migration

Use this skill to migrate an existing Attio integration when endpoints, schemas, client versions, or architecture change. It guides a contract comparison, compatibility work, shadow checks, a limited canary rollout, reconciliation, and a tested rollback plan.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Migrate an Attio integration through a contract-led inventory, OpenAPI and documentation diff, shadow validation, canary rollout, reconciliation, and tested rollback. Use when endpoint assumptions, client versions, schemas, or integration architecture must change. Trigger with "upgrade Attio integration", "Attio migration", or "Attio API contract change".

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Comparing an Attio integration with current API contracts
  • Planning schema or pagination changes
  • Checking a migration with shadow reads and fixtures
  • Rolling out to one workspace with rollback ready

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • references/official-docs.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Attio Contract Migration

Overview

This skill migrates the integration that actually exists. It does not assume a generic historical version jump; it proves every affected endpoint and data shape against current Attio contracts.

Prerequisites

  • Current integration commit, dependencies, and deployment topology
  • Endpoint, scope, pagination, data-shape, and webhook inventory
  • Representative redacted fixtures and reconciliation queries
  • Canary cohort, rollback owner, and recovery objective

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inventory current assumptions and tests. Use WebFetch only for current official Attio documentation and OpenAPI. Use Write or Edit after the contract diff, rollout boundary, and rollback point are documented.

Current Contract

  • Validate method, path, scopes, request fields, response fields, value shapes, and pagination per endpoint.
  • Treat official OpenAPI as an input to the diff, not a substitute for behavioral fixtures and endpoint documentation.
  • Record and entry queries may use offset pagination and score-based rate accounting; other endpoints can expose cursors.
  • Webhook changes must preserve raw-body signature verification and at-least-once idempotency.

Authentication

Preserve tenant-to-token binding and least privilege throughout the migration. Any new scope requires explicit justification, administrator approval, and a reversible credential plan.

Instructions

  1. Freeze a baseline of call sites, dependencies, contracts, fixtures, metrics, and current production behavior.
  2. Diff each affected endpoint against official documentation and OpenAPI.
  3. Classify changes as compatible, additive, behavior-sensitive, or breaking.
  4. Add compatibility adapters and tests for pagination, value shapes, errors, idempotency, and redaction.
  5. Run shadow reads or dry-run comparisons and reconcile mismatches without customer-facing mutations.
  6. Canary one bounded workspace or workload with explicit health and rollback thresholds.
  7. Expand in stages, retain rollback until reconciliation passes, then remove obsolete paths deliberately.

Approval Boundaries

Do not add scopes, alter destructive mutations, switch all tenants, or remove the rollback path without owner approval and recorded evidence.

Output

Return the before-and-after contract matrix, risk classification, adapter plan, test evidence, shadow or canary results, reconciliation status, and rollback decision.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Official sources disagreePause the affected endpoint and preserve both references.
Shadow results divergeClassify the mismatch and keep production on the old path.
Canary error budget failsRoll back and retain captured redacted evidence.
Rollback cannot restore stateStop before rollout and repair recovery first.

Examples

Input:

change=replace hand-written record client; cohort=one test workspace

Expected handoff:

contract-diff=complete; shadow=matched; canary=pass; rollback=retained

Resources

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月23日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月23日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月23日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月23日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月23日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28682026年10月23日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题