跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

auditing-access-control

Review access permissions in application code and cloud configuration. Build a role-to-resource permission matrix, identify excessive grants, missing authorization checks, and routes to higher privileges, then report severity, compliance gaps, and specific remediation steps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Audit access control implementations for security vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. Use when reviewing authentication and authorization. Trigger with 'audit access control', 'check permissions', or 'validate authorization'.

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Finding missing authorization checks in API routes
  • Reviewing overly broad AWS IAM permissions
  • Checking role permissions and separation of duties
  • Documenting access control compliance gaps

包含的文件(5)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB
  • assets/README.md303 B
  • references/README.md65 B
  • scripts/access_control_audit.py4.8 KB
  • scripts/README.md584 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Access Control Auditing

Overview

Audit access control implementations across codebases, cloud configurations, and application layers for security vulnerabilities and policy violations. This skill targets IAM policies, ACLs, RBAC configurations, file permissions, and API authorization logic to identify privilege escalation paths, overly permissive grants, and violations of the principle of least privilege.

Prerequisites

  • Access to the target codebase and configuration files in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/
  • Familiarity with the authorization model in use (RBAC, ABAC, ACL, or IAM)
  • grep, find, and standard shell utilities available via Bash
  • For cloud audits: CLI tools such as aws iam, gcloud, or az role installed and authenticated
  • Reference: references/README.md for IAM best practices, ACL vulnerability patterns, and NIST/GDPR access control standards

Instructions

  1. Enumerate all access control definitions by scanning for IAM policy files, RBAC configuration, ACL definitions, middleware authorization checks, and .htaccess or equivalent files using Glob and Grep.
  2. Map each role or principal to its granted permissions, building a permission matrix that identifies which subjects access which resources at which privilege level.
  3. Evaluate each permission grant against the principle of least privilege -- flag any wildcard permissions (*), overly broad resource scopes, or administrative access granted to non-admin roles.
  4. Check for separation of duties violations where a single role combines mutually exclusive privileges (e.g., both "create user" and "approve user").
  5. Identify privilege escalation paths by tracing role inheritance chains, looking for roles that can modify their own permissions or assume higher-privileged roles.
  6. Inspect API route handlers and middleware for missing or inconsistent authorization checks -- compare route definitions against their corresponding auth guards.
  7. Verify that default-deny is enforced: confirm that unauthenticated or unauthorized requests are rejected unless explicitly allowed.
  8. Cross-reference findings against compliance requirements (NIST AC-1 through AC-25, GDPR Article 25, SOC 2 CC6.1) and flag gaps.
  9. Classify each finding by severity (critical, high, medium, low) based on exploitability and blast radius.
  10. Generate a remediation plan with specific configuration changes, code patches, or policy updates for each finding.

Output

  • Permission matrix: Role-to-resource mapping table showing all grants
  • Findings report: Each finding includes severity, affected resource, description, CWE reference (e.g., CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management, CWE-285 Improper Authorization), and remediation steps
  • Compliance gap analysis: Checklist of NIST SP 800-53 AC controls and GDPR access control requirements with pass/fail status
  • Privilege escalation paths: Diagram or list of role chains that enable escalation
  • Executive summary: Total findings by severity, top risks, and recommended priority actions

Error Handling

ErrorCauseSolution
Permission denied reading config filesInsufficient filesystem accessRun with elevated permissions or request read access to the target directory
IAM CLI command not foundCloud CLI tools not installedInstall aws-cli, gcloud, or az and authenticate before running cloud audits
Empty role/permission scan resultsIncorrect glob patterns for the frameworkAdjust search patterns to match the target framework (e.g., @Roles() for NestJS, [Authorize] for .NET)
Timeout scanning large codebasesToo many files in scopeNarrow the scan scope with --exclude patterns for node_modules, vendor, or dist directories
Inconsistent policy formatMixed IAM policy versions or formatsNormalize policies to a single format before analysis; flag format inconsistencies in the report

Examples

Auditing a Node.js Express API

Scan route definitions in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/src/routes/ for missing authorization middleware. Grep for router.post, router.put, router.delete and verify each has a corresponding authMiddleware or requireRole() call. Flag any state-changing endpoint lacking authorization as CWE-862 (Missing Authorization), severity high.

Reviewing AWS IAM Policies

Parse all JSON policy files in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/infra/iam/. Flag policies containing "Effect": "Allow" with "Resource": "*" or "Action": "*" as CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management), severity critical. Recommend scoping to specific ARNs and actions per the principle of least privilege.

RBAC Configuration Audit

Analyze role definitions in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/config/roles.yaml. Build a permission matrix, identify roles with overlapping admin-level privileges, and flag any role that can both create and approve its own resources as a separation-of-duties violation (NIST AC-5), severity medium.

Resources

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace28672026年10月23日 更新

查看 jeremylongshore 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题