跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

cloud-expert

Cloud guardrails for any vendor workload — Google Cloud (GCP, Vertex AI, GKE), AWS (IAM, EKS, Bedrock), Azure (Entra ID, Policy, AKS), Alibaba Cloud (RAM, mainland/international residency). Enforces identity least-privilege, mechanical policy, data boundaries, residency, cost caps, network egress and observability, with official-source validation before any claim. Trigger on any cloud infrastructure design, review, Terraform plan, or LLM/agent deployment; the-architect routes here.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(5)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB
  • references/alibaba.md4.2 KB
  • references/aws.md4.2 KB
  • references/azure.md4.3 KB
  • references/gcp.md5.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Cloud Expert

Identity, tenancy, residency and cost are the design constraints — not the console's defaults.

One procedure, four vendor references. This skill enforces the discipline that makes a cloud workload production-safe on whichever provider the team runs. It is not a vendor feature catalogue: read the vendor reference for specifics, then apply the shared procedure.

VendorReferenceIdentity modelPolicy engine
Google Cloudreferences/gcp.mdIAM + Workload Identity FederationOrganisation Policy, VPC Service Controls
AWSreferences/aws.mdIAM roles + OIDC federationSCPs, Config, Control Tower
Azurereferences/azure.mdEntra ID + managed identitiesAzure Policy, Management Groups
Alibaba Cloudreferences/alibaba.mdRAM roles + STSResource Directory, Control Policies; mainland / international split

When to use

  • Designing any cloud infrastructure, new or modified
  • Before deploying agents or LLM workloads to a cloud provider
  • Reviewing a Terraform plan or an architecture diagram for a cloud workload
  • When a system touches multiple tenants, regulated data, or crosses a regional boundary
  • When the-architect records a decision that names a specific cloud

Procedure

Open the vendor reference first; every step below has vendor detail there.

  1. Identity and access — least privilege for every workload identity and human role: no broad administrative roles on service identities; federated identities over long-lived keys; conditional, time-bound access where the platform supports it.
  2. Governance made mechanical — region, resource-type and service constraints enforced by the platform's policy engine, not by convention; resource hierarchy mirrors environment and data classification; audit logging on identity changes and data-plane operations before any data lands.
  3. Data boundaries — for every store: classification (public / internal / confidential / regulated), encryption at rest with customer-managed keys where required, tenant separation enforced at the data layer, and an explicit agreement wherever data crosses an account, project, subscription or organisation boundary.
  4. Residency — every resource pinned to the required geography; policy prevents accidental multi-region or global creation; model endpoints regional where residency matters.
  5. Cost controls — budget alerts at 50 / 75 / 90 / 100 %; autoscaling upper bounds set; LLM call volumes capped or rate-limited; commitments or spot capacity evaluated.
  6. Network and egress — private connectivity where public endpoints are avoidable; egress estimated for cross-region and internet-bound traffic; default-deny with explicit allows.
  7. Observability — dashboards, alerting on error rate, latency and cost, and log routing to a central retention point, all before go-live.
  8. Run the Adversarial Gate — name the vendor's common failure modes (listed in each reference) and confirm each has a mitigation or a named risk owner.

Official sources — validate before you assert

Every service, quota, price or model claim cites an official document from the vendor's documentation or architecture centre (URLs in each reference). Quotas, prices and model names are dated facts: stale until re-verified against the source on the day you assert them.

Outputs

  • Guardrail checklist (pass / fail per item), per vendor
  • Identity matrix: principal | role | scope | justification
  • Data classification and boundary map; residency confirmation
  • Budget alert and autoscaling-bound confirmation
  • Open findings for human review

Guardrails

  • No administrative roles on workload identities. Ever.
  • Residency is a constraint, not a preference. Enforce it with policy, not convention.
  • Budget alerts are not optional. An unmonitored LLM workload produces a surprise invoice.
  • Audit logs are evidence. Enable them before go-live, not after an incident.
  • One vendor reference per decision. Do not let a multi-cloud design inherit the weakest provider's defaults; run the procedure per vendor.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Google ADK (Agent Development Kit) orchestration patterns — boundaries, agent composition, and tool seams. Trigger when designing or reviewing multi-agent systems built on ADK. Authoritative source: adk.dev.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience132026年10月16日 更新

JP's signature red-team pass — "how would I break this?" Argue against your own approach before proceeding. Trigger on any high-stakes decision, architecture choice, or before marking work complete.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience132026年10月16日 更新

Read-only SRE checkup of any GCP project: deterministic probes of the edge, Cloud Run services, 7-day error logs, Cloud Scheduler, alert policies and uptime checks, Secret Manager and IAM, the data stores and the machine's own scheduled jobs, audited into one fixed status table (LIVE / WARNING / RED / INCONCLUSIVE) with evidence, findings by severity, what could not be checked, and a single OVERALL line delivered as one notification. Parametrised by a per-project manifest, so the same routine runs on every project. Use when the operator says "cloud checkup", "SRE check", "is everything live", "what's healthy / warning / red", "any errors this week", "audit the infra", "weekly checkup", "set up the weekly checkup", before a deploy or demo, or after an incident. Cloud Run first; App Engine and GKE differ only in the serving probes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience132026年10月16日 更新

LLM and cloud cost awareness — model tiering, token budgets, right-sizing, and when a cheaper model suffices. Trigger before finalising any architecture that calls LLMs, before scaling a workload, or when a cost estimate is needed.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience132026年10月16日 更新

Challenge vision alignment, value, cost, risk and operating ownership at material scope or release decisions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience132026年10月16日 更新

Decompose an epic into atomic parallelizable tasks, route each to the right skill, and keep the four delivery records straight — issues, STATUS, ROADMAP, CHANGELOG. Use as a meta-router when several skills could apply, and as the baseline for how delivery state is recorded. Trigger at the start of any multi-track epic, when the skill count exceeds ~12, or when the records have drifted from reality.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience132026年10月16日 更新

查看 jpantsjoha 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题