跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

prototype

Build a throwaway prototype to flesh out a design before committing to it. Routes between two branches — a runnable terminal app for state/business-logic questions, or several radically different UI variations toggleable from one route. Use when the user wants to prototype, sanity-check a data model or state machine, mock up a UI, explore design options, or says "prototype this", "let me play with it", "try a few designs".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md3.2 KB
  • LOGIC.md5.5 KB
  • UI.md6.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Prototype

A prototype is throwaway code that answers a question. The question decides the shape.

Pick a branch

Identify which question is being answered — from the user's prompt, the surrounding code, or by asking if the user is around:

  • "Does this logic / state model feel right?" → LOGIC.md. Build a tiny interactive terminal app that pushes the state machine through cases that are hard to reason about on paper.
  • "What should this look like?" → UI.md. Generate several radically different UI variations on a single route, switchable via a URL search param and a floating bottom bar.

The two branches produce very different artifacts — getting this wrong wastes the whole prototype. If the question is genuinely ambiguous and the user isn't reachable, default to whichever branch better matches the surrounding code (a backend module → logic; a page or component → UI) and state the assumption at the top of the prototype.

Rules that apply to both

  1. Throwaway from day one, and clearly marked as such. Locate the prototype code close to where it will actually be used (next to the module or page it's prototyping for) so context is obvious — but name it so a casual reader can see it's a prototype, not production. For throwaway UI routes, obey whatever routing convention the project already uses; don't invent a new top-level structure.
  2. One command to run. Whatever the project's existing task runner supports — pnpm <name>, python <path>, bun <path>, etc. The user must be able to start it without thinking.
  3. No persistence by default. State lives in memory. Persistence is the thing the prototype is checking, not something it should depend on. If the question explicitly involves a database, hit a scratch DB or a local file with a clear "PROTOTYPE — wipe me" name.
  4. Skip the polish. No tests, no error handling beyond what makes the prototype runnable, no abstractions. The point is to learn something fast and then delete it.
  5. Surface the state. After every action (logic) or on every variant switch (UI), print or render the full relevant state so the user can see what changed.
  6. Delete or absorb when done. When the prototype has answered its question, either delete it or fold the validated decision into the real code — don't leave it rotting in the repo.

When done

The answer is the only thing worth keeping from a prototype. Capture it somewhere durable (commit message, ADR, issue, or a NOTES.md next to the prototype) along with the question it was answering. If the user is around, that capture is a quick conversation; if not, leave the placeholder so they (or you, on the next pass) can fill in the verdict before deleting the prototype.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Plan and use user-consented local camera and microphone observations for an explicitly authorized physical target. Use when a capture can establish a bounded physical-state observation such as whether a test fixture changed state, an instrument reading changed, or equipment noise changed relatively.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

justsml/ExploitHunter.app142026年10月17日 更新

Plan vulnerability research using conventional bug-hunting and pentest stage names, specialty playbooks, and a research-hypothesis-experiment loop. Use when designing a bug bounty workflow, selecting tools and strategies, building a decision tree, or turning a target/scope into a staged hunting plan.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

justsml/ExploitHunter.app142026年10月17日 更新

Passive code-review lane for authorized repositories, local checkouts, uploaded source archives, and diffs. Use when the security research agent needs deterministic candidate discovery before expensive AI investigation, scoped PR-style review, append-only evidence records, or independent revalidation of code findings.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

justsml/ExploitHunter.app142026年10月17日 更新

Run independent, task-matched expert attempts, select a base, and synthesize the strongest result.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

justsml/ExploitHunter.app142026年10月17日 更新

Select established CTF and security-research tools for authorized artifact triage, web inspection, reversing, crypto, forensics, networking, and exploit validation. Use when a user provides a CTF-style tool catalog, asks which tools to use, or needs safe usage instructions for common offensive/security tools.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

justsml/ExploitHunter.app142026年10月17日 更新

diagnose

免费

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

justsml/ExploitHunter.app142026年10月17日 更新

查看 justsml 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题