Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Agent skill for code-review-swarm - invoke with $agent-code-review-swarm
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
name: code-review-swarm description: Deploy specialized AI agents to perform comprehensive, intelligent code reviews that go beyond traditional static analysis tools: mcp__claude-flow__swarm_init, mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn, mcp__claude-flow__task_orchestrate, Bash, Read, Write, TodoWrite color: blue type: development capabilities:
Deploy specialized AI agents to perform comprehensive, intelligent code reviews that go beyond traditional static analysis.
# Initialize code review swarm with gh CLI
# Get PR details
PR_DATA=$(gh pr view 123 --json files,additions,deletions,title,body)
PR_DIFF=$(gh pr diff 123)
# Initialize swarm with PR context
npx ruv-swarm github review-init \
--pr 123 \
--pr-data "$PR_DATA" \
--diff "$PR_DIFF" \
--agents "security,performance,style,architecture,accessibility" \
--depth comprehensive
# Post initial review status
gh pr comment 123 --body "🔍 Multi-agent code review initiated"
# Security-focused review with gh CLI
# Get changed files
CHANGED_FILES=$(gh pr view 123 --json files --jq '.files[].path')
# Run security review
SECURITY_RESULTS=$(npx ruv-swarm github review-security \
--pr 123 \
--files "$CHANGED_FILES" \
--check "owasp,cve,secrets,permissions" \
--suggest-fixes)
# Post security findings
if echo "$SECURITY_RESULTS" | grep -q "critical"; then
# Request changes for critical issues
gh pr review 123 --request-changes --body "$SECURITY_RESULTS"
# Add security label
gh pr edit 123 --add-label "security-review-required"
else
# Post as comment for non-critical issues
gh pr comment 123 --body "$SECURITY_RESULTS"
fi
# Performance analysis
npx ruv-swarm github review-performance \
--pr 123 \
--profile "cpu,memory,io" \
--benchmark-against main \
--suggest-optimizations
# Architecture review
npx ruv-swarm github review-architecture \
--pr 123 \
--check "patterns,coupling,cohesion,solid" \
--visualize-impact \
--suggest-refactoring
# .github$review-swarm.yml
version: 1
review:
auto-trigger: true
required-agents:
- security
- performance
- style
optional-agents:
- architecture
- accessibility
- i18n
thresholds:
security: block
performance: warn
style: suggest
rules:
security:
- no-eval
- no-hardcoded-secrets
- proper-auth-checks
performance:
- no-n-plus-one
- efficient-queries
- proper-caching
architecture:
- max-coupling: 5
- min-cohesion: 0.7
- follow-patterns
// Security checks performed
{
"checks": [
"SQL injection vulnerabilities",
"XSS attack vectors",
"Authentication bypasses",
"Authorization flaws",
"Cryptographic weaknesses",
"Dependency vulnerabilities",
"Secret exposure",
"CORS misconfigurations"
],
"actions": [
"Block PR on critical issues",
"Suggest secure alternatives",
"Add security test cases",
"Update security documentation"
]
}
// Performance analysis
{
"metrics": [
"Algorithm complexity",
"Database query efficiency",
"Memory allocation patterns",
"Cache utilization",
"Network request optimization",
"Bundle size impact",
"Render performance"
],
"benchmarks": [
"Compare with baseline",
"Load test simulations",
"Memory leak detection",
"Bottleneck identification"
]
}
// Style enforcement
{
"checks": [
"Code formatting",
"Naming conventions",
"Documentation standards",
"Comment quality",
"Test coverage",
"Error handling patterns",
"Logging standards"
],
"auto-fix": [
"Formatting issues",
"Import organization",
"Trailing whitespace",
"Simple naming issues"
]
}
// Architecture analysis
{
"patterns": [
"Design pattern adherence",
"SOLID principles",
"DRY violations",
"Separation of concerns",
"Dependency injection",
"Layer violations",
"Circular dependencies"
],
"metrics": [
"Coupling metrics",
"Cohesion scores",
"Complexity measures",
"Maintainability index"
]
}
# Review with full context
npx ruv-swarm github review-context \
--pr 123 \
--load-related-prs \
--analyze-impact \
--check-breaking-changes
# Learn from past reviews
npx ruv-swarm github review-learn \
--analyze-past-reviews \
--identify-patterns \
--improve-suggestions \
--reduce-false-positives
# Analyze related PRs together
npx ruv-swarm github review-batch \
--prs "123,124,125" \
--check-consistency \
--verify-integration \
--combined-impact
# .github$workflows$auto-review.yml
name: Automated Code Review
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize]
jobs:
swarm-review:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions$checkout@v3
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Setup GitHub CLI
run: echo "${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" | gh auth login --with-token
- name: Run Review Swarm
run: |
# Get PR context with gh CLI
PR_NUM=${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
PR_DATA=$(gh pr view $PR_NUM --json files,title,body,labels)
# Run swarm review
REVIEW_OUTPUT=$(npx ruv-swarm github review-all \
--pr $PR_NUM \
--pr-data "$PR_DATA" \
--agents "security,performance,style,architecture")
# Post review results
echo "$REVIEW_OUTPUT" | gh pr review $PR_NUM --comment -F -
# Update PR status
if echo "$REVIEW_OUTPUT" | grep -q "approved"; then
gh pr review $PR_NUM --approve
elif echo "$REVIEW_OUTPUT" | grep -q "changes-requested"; then
gh pr review $PR_NUM --request-changes -b "See review comments above"
fi
// Custom review triggers
{
"triggers": {
"high-risk-files": {
"paths": ["**$auth/**", "**$payment/**"],
"agents": ["security", "architecture"],
"depth": "comprehensive"
},
"performance-critical": {
"paths": ["**$api/**", "**$database/**"],
"agents": ["performance", "database"],
"benchmarks": true
},
"ui-changes": {
"paths": ["**$components/**", "**$styles/**"],
"agents": ["accessibility", "style", "i18n"],
"visual-tests": true
}
}
}
# Generate contextual review comments with gh CLI
# Get PR diff with context
PR_DIFF=$(gh pr diff 123 --color never)
PR_FILES=$(gh pr view 123 --json files)
# Generate review comments
COMMENTS=$(npx ruv-swarm github review-comment \
--pr 123 \
--diff "$PR_DIFF" \
--files "$PR_FILES" \
--style "constructive" \
--include-examples \
--suggest-fixes)
# Post comments using gh CLI
echo "$COMMENTS" | jq -c '.[]' | while read -r comment; do
FILE=$(echo "$comment" | jq -r '.path')
LINE=$(echo "$comment" | jq -r '.line')
BODY=$(echo "$comment" | jq -r '.body')
# Create review with inline comments
gh api \
--method POST \
$repos/:owner/:repo$pulls/123$comments \
-f path="$FILE" \
-f line="$LINE" \
-f body="$BODY" \
-f commit_id="$(gh pr view 123 --json headRefOid -q .headRefOid)"
done
<!-- Security Issue Template -->
🔒 **Security Issue: [Type]**
**Severity**: 🔴 Critical / 🟡 High / 🟢 Low
**Description**:
[Clear explanation of the security issue]
**Impact**:
[Potential consequences if not addressed]
**Suggested Fix**:
```language
[Code example of the fix]
References:
### Batch Comment Management
```bash
# Manage review comments efficiently
npx ruv-swarm github review-comments \
--pr 123 \
--group-by "agent,severity" \
--summarize \
--resolve-outdated
# Required status checks
protection_rules:
required_status_checks:
contexts:
- "review-swarm$security"
- "review-swarm$performance"
- "review-swarm$architecture"
# Define quality gates
npx ruv-swarm github quality-gates \
--define '{
"security": {"threshold": "no-critical"},
"performance": {"regression": "<5%"},
"coverage": {"minimum": "80%"},
"architecture": {"complexity": "<10"}
}'
# Track review effectiveness
npx ruv-swarm github review-metrics \
--period 30d \
--metrics "issues-found,false-positives,fix-rate" \
--export-dashboard
# Train on your codebase
npx ruv-swarm github review-train \
--learn-patterns \
--adapt-to-style \
--improve-accuracy
// Create custom review agent
class CustomReviewAgent {
async review(pr) {
const issues = [];
// Custom logic here
if (await this.checkCustomRule(pr)) {
issues.push({
severity: 'warning',
message: 'Custom rule violation',
suggestion: 'Fix suggestion'
});
}
return issues;
}
}
# Orchestrate complex reviews
npx ruv-swarm github review-orchestrate \
--strategy "risk-based" \
--allocate-time-budget \
--prioritize-critical
# Auth system changes
npx ruv-swarm github review-init \
--pr 456 \
--agents "security,authentication,audit" \
--depth "maximum" \
--require-security-approval
# Database optimization
npx ruv-swarm github review-init \
--pr 789 \
--agents "performance,database,caching" \
--benchmark \
--profile
# New component library
npx ruv-swarm github review-init \
--pr 321 \
--agents "accessibility,style,i18n,docs" \
--visual-regression \
--component-tests
# Launch review dashboard
npx ruv-swarm github review-dashboard \
--real-time \
--show "agent-activity,issue-trends,fix-rates"
# Generate review reports
npx ruv-swarm github review-report \
--format "markdown" \
--include "summary,details,trends" \
--email-stakeholders
See also: swarm-pr.md, workflow-automation.md
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Automate 2chat tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Set up and use 1Password CLI for sign-in, desktop integration, and reading or injecting secrets.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Build integrated IS/BS/CF financial workbooks in Excel.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Entry point for 9Router — local/remote AI gateway with OpenAI-compatible REST for chat, image, TTS, embeddings, web search, web fetch. Use when the user mentions 9Router, NINEROUTER_URL, or wants AI without writing provider boilerplate. This skill covers setup + indexes capability skills; fetch the relevant capability SKILL.md from the URLs below when needed.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Chat / code generation via 9Router using OpenAI /v1/chat/completions or Anthropic /v1/messages format with streaming + auto-fallback combos. Use when the user wants to ask an LLM, generate code, summarize text, or run prompts through 9Router.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。