跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

evolutionary-naming

Use when refactoring code with poor names, when asked to improve naming, or when a user struggles to name a class/method/variable. Symptoms include -Manager/-Util suffixes, single-letter variables, process/handle/do verbs, primitive obsession, god methods with multiple responsibilities. Two modes — audit (broad scan, list opportunities) and improve (walk one specific identifier through the process).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(4)

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB
  • audit-mode.md4.2 KB
  • improve-mode.md4.5 KB
  • reference.md9.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Evolutionary Naming

Overview

Naming is a process, not a single step. Names evolve through 7 progressive steps grouped into 3 phases. Match the depth of work to the user's actual story — don't run the full pipeline every time.

This skill is advisory. It reads code and proposes renames, transitions, and the commit message you'd write for each — it does not edit files or run git. The user applies the changes. Phrase every transition as a proposal, and suggest the commit message they would use, rather than claiming the rename is done.

Based on Arlo Belshee's "Naming as a Process" (CC BY 3.0). Updated edition: digdeeproots.com.

The Three Phases

PhaseStepsNature
Phase 1: Insight → NameMissing → Nonsense → Honest → Honest and CompleteUniversal. Pure naming. No structural change. Safe to walk continuously.
Phase 2: Name → StructureHonest and Complete → Does the Right ThingCodebase-specific. Requires structural refactoring. Ask permission.
Phase 3: Combine for DesignDoes the Right Thing → Intent → Domain AbstractionRequires reading call sites and domain context. Ask permission.

Choose Your Mode

This skill operates in two modes. Pick the one that matches the user's request.

User signalModeFile
Specific identifier named ("d を改善", "DocumentManager をどうにか", "this method")improve-modeimprove-mode.md
One clear target inside a code block + "リファクタリング" / "改善"improve-modeimprove-mode.md
"全体の命名を見直したい", "改善余地ある?", "命名レビュー", "scan", "audit", "リストだけほしい"audit-modeaudit-mode.md
Audit followup: "X だけ直して" after audit outputimprove-mode (target = X)improve-mode.md
Ambiguous (large code paste, no specific target, no "全体" language)Ask the user: "全体を監査しますか、特定の識別子を改善しますか?"

Mode = audit: Read audit-mode.md. Produce a structured table of all naming opportunities. Do not execute changes.

Mode = improve: Read improve-mode.md. Walk one identifier through phase transitions. Pause at phase boundaries.

Both modes share diagnostic criteria, transition mechanics, and red flags from reference.md.

When to Stop

How far to walk depends on the user's depth signal. The canonical signal → stop-at table lives in reference.md ("Depth Signals — How Far to Walk"); both modes read from it.

"You take the minimum steps to get the name to meet your need for the current story." — leaving names incomplete for colleagues to extend is a feature, not a flaw.

Files in This Skill

  • SKILL.md — this file. Router and overview.
  • reference.md — shared 7-step diagnosis table, transitions, red flags, applesauce/probably_/AndStuff guidance.
  • audit-mode.md — exhaustive scan workflow + output template.
  • improve-mode.md — interactive single-target workflow + pause protocol.

Read the mode file you selected, plus reference.md for diagnosis details.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

报告此技能的问题