跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

pipeline-health-check

Monitor a data warehouse for stale tables, unusual row counts, column changes, and failed loads. Receive alerts with evidence and likely causes, plus GitHub issues for human review, while warehouse data remains unchanged.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Hourly warehouse health sweep for {{warehouse_schema}}. Checks every monitored table's freshness against its SLA, compares row counts to the table's own trailing baseline, diffs the schema for drift, and checks for failed or stalled loads. Posts anomalies to {{alert_channel}} and drafts a GitHub issue in {{incident_repo}} with the likely cause. Read-only across the warehouse — never modifies data, tables, or pipelines.

集成工具GitHub

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Check warehouse health every hour
  • Investigate delayed table updates
  • Detect unusual row counts or column changes
  • Record load failures for incident review

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

<skill name="pipeline-health-check"> <overview> Catch a warehouse problem — a stale table, a row-count anomaly, schema drift, a failed load — before it surfaces as a wrong number in a downstream dashboard. An hourly cron spawns a fresh session; this skill turns a scan of {{warehouse_schema}} into a concrete anomaly (table, evidence, likely cause), an alert in {{alert_channel}}, and a drafted GitHub issue in {{incident_repo}}.

Proactive and read-only; covers every monitored table in {{warehouse_schema}} on every sweep. Nothing carries over between sweeps — freshness windows, row baselines, and schema shapes are all recomputed from the warehouse's own history each run. Handle each table as an independent unit: a failure or anomaly on one table never blocks the checks on the others in the same sweep. </overview>

<when-to-load> - The hourly pipeline-health sweep fires on its cadence. - A human asks the agent to check warehouse health or explain a specific table's freshness, row count, or schema. </when-to-load> <workflow>

Step 1 — Enumerate the monitored tables (read-only)

Via the Postgres connector, scoped to {{warehouse_schema}}:

SELECT table_name
FROM information_schema.tables
WHERE table_schema = '{{warehouse_schema}}'
  AND table_type = 'BASE TABLE'
ORDER BY table_name;

Skip anything noted as excluded or intentionally low-cadence in skill memory (e.g. a monthly-refresh reference table). Treat every remaining table as its own case for the rest of this sweep.

Step 2 — Check freshness against SLA (read-only)

For each table with a timestamp column (updated_at, loaded_at, created_at, or whatever the table's load convention is):

SELECT MAX(<timestamp_column>) AS last_loaded
FROM {{warehouse_schema}}.<table>;

Compare last_loaded against the table's SLA: a specific one noted in skill memory if it has one, else the {{freshness_sla_hours}}-hour default. A table older than its SLA is a freshness anomaly — likely cause: the upstream load job stopped running, is silently erroring, or was disabled.

Step 3 — Check row count against trailing baseline (read-only)

Compute the baseline from the warehouse's own history rather than any stored memory — a table with a date/partition column can be trended directly:

SELECT date_trunc('day', <timestamp_column>) AS day, COUNT(*) AS row_count
FROM {{warehouse_schema}}.<table>
WHERE <timestamp_column> >= now() - interval '14 days'
GROUP BY 1
ORDER BY 1;

For a table without a usable date column, compare the current total count to what it was captured as on the last few sweeps (posted in {{alert_channel}}'s history) instead. Flag a row-count anomaly when today's count is well outside the trailing trend in either direction:

PatternLikely cause
Count far below trend, or zero new rows since last loadLoad ran short, silently skipped a batch, or didn't run
Count far above trend (e.g. multi-x jump)Duplicate load, retried job double-inserted, or a batch wasn't deduplicated
Count in line with trendNo anomaly

Step 4 — Diff the schema for drift (read-only)

SELECT column_name, data_type, is_nullable
FROM information_schema.columns
WHERE table_schema = '{{warehouse_schema}}' AND table_name = '<table>'
ORDER BY ordinal_position;

Compare against the shape noted in skill memory or the prior sweep's read (kept as agent context for this run only, not a durable ledger). A schema-drift anomaly is any added, dropped, renamed, or retyped column since the last comparison — likely cause: an upstream source schema changed and the load picked it up (or silently dropped/nulled the new field).

Step 5 — Check load history for failures (read-only)

If the warehouse has a load/job-run log table (e.g. etl_runs, load_history, a dbt run_results equivalent):

SELECT job_name, status, started_at, finished_at, error_message
FROM {{warehouse_schema}}.<load_log_table>
WHERE started_at >= now() - interval '2 hours'
ORDER BY started_at DESC;

Any row with a failed/errored status, or a job that started but never finished within its normal duration, is a failed-load anomaly — attach the error_message verbatim as evidence.

Step 6 — Post the alert and draft the issue

For every anomaly found across Steps 2–5, post one message to {{alert_channel}}: the table, the anomaly type, the evidence (the timestamp, the counts, the schema diff, or the error message), and the likely cause from the tables above. Then draft the incident:

gh issue create --repo {{incident_repo}} \
  --title "[pipeline-health] <table>: <anomaly type>" \
  --body "Detected by the hourly pipeline-health sweep.

**Table:** {{warehouse_schema}}.<table>
**Anomaly:** <freshness | row-count | schema-drift | failed-load>
**Evidence:** <the timestamp / counts / diff / error message>
**Likely cause:** <cause from Step 2-5>

This is a draft for triage — no data, schema, or pipeline change has been made."

A table with no anomaly gets no message and no issue — silence is the all-clear.

</workflow> <guardrails> - **Read-only across the entire warehouse, no exceptions.** No `INSERT`, `UPDATE`, `DELETE`, `ALTER`, `DROP`, `TRUNCATE`, or any DDL/DML — every connector call in this skill is a `SELECT`. - **Never touch a pipeline.** No restarting a job, no re-running a load, no editing an orchestrator config. Diagnosis only. - **Draft, not decide.** The GitHub issue is opened as a draft for a human to triage; never assign, label as resolved, or close it from this skill. - **Independent per table.** A failure or anomaly investigating one table never stops the checks on the others found in the same sweep. - **No memory required between sweeps.** Freshness windows, row baselines, and schema shapes are recomputed from the warehouse's own history each run — this is a fresh session every sweep, not a persistent ledger. - **Scoped secrets.** The warehouse credential is brokered through the connector and the GitHub token is injected at runtime; neither is ever shown to the model or written to logs. - **One alert per anomaly per sweep.** Don't re-alert or re-draft an issue for a table already flagged this same sweep. </guardrails> </skill>

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Review Slack access requests against Okta role and team information, then prepare narrowly scoped GitHub or AWS IAM permissions. Apply changes only after an eligible person's approval and record the grant, reasoning, approver, and timestamp.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Reviewing GitHub repository access requests from Slack
  • Preparing AWS IAM permissions for a specific task
  • Routing sensitive access requests for additional review
kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月23日 更新

Research companies and people before outreach or meetings. Combines business profiles, recent news, hiring signals, and key contacts into a sourced brief with talking points and suggested questions, adding relationship history when CRM data is connected.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Research a prospective customer before outreach
  • Prepare background information for meeting attendees
  • Compare a competitor's products and positioning
kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月23日 更新

Review daily Google Ads and Meta Ads results for budget pacing, declining performance, and unusual activity. Get prioritized findings with supporting numbers and concrete recommendations for a marketing team to assess and carry out.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking whether campaign budgets are being spent on schedule
  • Investigating rising acquisition costs or falling ad returns
  • Finding ads and keywords that spend without converting
kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月23日 更新

Automate website tasks such as navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, and extracting data. The skill also supports web app testing, with specialized guides for Electron desktop apps, Slack, and cloud browsers.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Automate form entry and page navigation
  • Capture screenshots and extract page data
  • Explore web apps for bugs
kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月23日 更新

Process emailed vendor invoices by extracting details, comparing them with purchase orders and invoice history, and recording duplicates, overcharges, or missing orders. Summarize results in Slack for human review; payment approval and execution remain with people.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking incoming invoices against purchase orders
  • Finding duplicate invoices and likely resends
  • Reviewing unit prices and remaining order balances
kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月23日 更新

billing

免费

Guide changes to Kortix billing code, admin controls, and pricing screens. Explain how plans, trials, enterprise contracts, and access exceptions should work, where pricing is defined, and which audited routes must handle account changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Update billing logic and its specification together
  • Review how trials and enterprise contracts are handled
  • Find the code that defines prices and allowances
kortix-ai/suna2万2026年10月23日 更新

查看 kortix-ai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题