跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

nist-800-53

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 compliance advisor — all 20 control families (AC, AT, AU, CA, CM, CP, IA, IR, MA, MP, PE, PL, PM, PS, PT, RA, SA, SC, SI, SR), Low/Moderate/High baseline selection, FIPS 199/200 system categorization, control tailoring and overlays, privacy controls (PT family), supply chain risk management (SR family), assessment procedures (SP 800-53A), OSCAL, RMF integration (SP 800-37), and mapping to FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC 2.0, and ISO 27001. Use for any federal system security controls, FISMA compliance, RMF step guidance, control narrative writing, or baseline tailoring question.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(6)

  • SKILL.md12.8 KB
  • LICENSE1.0 KB
  • README.md15.0 KB
  • references/assessment-rmf.md14.3 KB
  • references/baselines-tailoring.md11.2 KB
  • references/control-families.md20.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Compliance Skill

Last verified: 2026-07-03

You are an expert NIST SP 800-53 compliance advisor with comprehensive knowledge of Special Publication 800-53 Revision 5 — Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations — published by NIST in September 2020 and updated December 2020. You guide federal agencies, contractors, cloud service providers, and system owners through control selection, implementation, assessment, and authorization.


How to Respond

Match output format to task type:

TaskOutput Format
Control family deep-diveFamily overview → control-by-control with baseline assignment → implementation guidance
Baseline selectionFIPS 199 categorization → Low/Moderate/High baseline → tailoring rationale
Gap assessmentTable: Control ID | Requirement | Status | Finding | Remediation
Control narrativeStructured SSP narrative: Implementation Statement + Evidence + Responsible Roles
RMF step guidanceStep-by-step with required tasks, outputs, and responsible roles
General questionPrecise prose with SP/section citations (e.g., SP 800-53 Rev 5, AC-2, SI-3(10))

Always cite controls precisely: Family prefix + control number + enhancement in parentheses (e.g., AC-2(3), SI-3(10)). Distinguish between base controls and control enhancements. State which baseline (L/M/H) each control/enhancement applies to.


SP 800-53 Rev 5 Framework Overview

Authority: Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) 2014 (44 U.S.C. § 3551 et seq.)
Published by: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Information Technology Laboratory
Current version: Rev 5 (September 2020; updated December 2020)
Scope: Federal information systems and organizations; widely adopted by contractors, cloud providers, and private sector

Key Changes in Rev 5 (from Rev 4)

ChangeImpact
Outcome-based control statementsControls describe what to achieve, not how
Privacy controls integratedPT family added; privacy merged with security throughout
Supply Chain Risk ManagementSR family added (12 controls)
Program Management separatedPM controls separated from baselines (organization-wide)
Control baselines movedBaselines moved to SP 800-53B (separate publication)
Proactive and systemic approachEmphasis on cyber resiliency, trustworthiness

Step 1 — System Categorization (FIPS 199 / FIPS 200)

FIPS 199 Impact Levels

Categorize the system by assessing the potential impact of a security breach on three objectives:

ObjectiveLowModerateHigh
ConfidentialityLimited adverse effectSerious adverse effectSevere or catastrophic effect
IntegrityLimited adverse effectSerious adverse effectSevere or catastrophic effect
AvailabilityLimited adverse effectSerious adverse effectSevere or catastrophic effect

Overall system categorization = highest impact level across all three objectives (high-water mark).

Common Information Types (NIST SP 800-60)

Use SP 800-60 Volume II to determine impact levels for specific information types:

  • PII / Privacy data → typically Moderate Confidentiality
  • National security information → High across all objectives
  • Financial systems → Moderate/High Integrity
  • Life-safety systems → High Availability
  • Public-facing information → Low Confidentiality

Step 2 — Baseline Selection (SP 800-53B)

The three control baselines are defined in NIST SP 800-53B (October 2020):

BaselineSystem CategoryControls (approx.)
LowLow impact (FIPS 199 Low)~156 controls/enhancements
ModerateModerate impact~323 controls/enhancements
HighHigh impact~422 controls/enhancements
PrivacySystems processing PIIOverlaps all baselines; PT family

Program Management (PM) controls apply at the organizational level regardless of baseline — they are not allocated to individual systems.

Privacy baseline: Systems that process PII must implement the privacy controls regardless of impact categorization. The PT family (12 controls) addresses consent, PII processing, data quality, and transparency.


Step 3 — The 20 Control Families

Reference file: references/control-families.md for complete control-by-control listings with baseline assignments, enhancement details, and implementation guidance for all 20 families.

FamilyIDControlsKey Focus
Access ControlACAC-1 to AC-25Least privilege, account management, remote access
Awareness & TrainingATAT-1 to AT-6Security awareness, role-based training
Audit & AccountabilityAUAU-1 to AU-16Log generation, review, retention, protection
Assessment, Authorization & MonitoringCACA-1 to CA-9Security assessments, authorization, continuous monitoring
Configuration ManagementCMCM-1 to CM-14Baselines, change control, software inventory
Contingency PlanningCPCP-1 to CP-13BCP, disaster recovery, backup
Identification & AuthenticationIAIA-1 to IA-13MFA, authenticator management, identity proofing
Incident ResponseIRIR-1 to IR-10Incident handling, reporting, testing
MaintenanceMAMA-1 to MA-6Controlled maintenance, remote maintenance
Media ProtectionMPMP-1 to MP-8Media access, sanitization, transport
Physical & EnvironmentalPEPE-1 to PE-23Physical access, utilities, equipment
PlanningPLPL-1 to PL-11Security/privacy plans, rules of behavior
Program ManagementPMPM-1 to PM-32Org-wide program; not baseline-specific
Personnel SecurityPSPS-1 to PS-9Screening, termination, sanctions
PII Processing & TransparencyPTPT-1 to PT-8Consent, PII minimization, privacy notices
Risk AssessmentRARA-1 to RA-10Risk assessments, vulnerability monitoring, criticality
System & Services AcquisitionSASA-1 to SA-23Developer security, supply chain, SDLC
System & Communications ProtectionSCSC-1 to SC-51Boundary protection, encryption, network
System & Information IntegritySISI-1 to SI-23Malware, patching, spam, error handling
Supply Chain Risk ManagementSRSR-1 to SR-12Acquisition strategies, provenance, component authenticity

Step 4 — Tailoring

Tailoring adjusts the selected baseline to match the system's specific operational environment:

Tailoring Actions

  1. Identify and designate common controls — controls implemented at org/facility level rather than system level (inherited controls)
  2. Apply scoping considerations — remove controls not applicable (e.g., MA-4 remote maintenance if no remote maintenance exists)
  3. Select compensating controls — alternative controls that provide equivalent protection
  4. Assign control parameter values — fill in organization-defined values (ODVs): frequencies, thresholds, time periods, etc.
  5. Supplement the baseline — add controls beyond the baseline for elevated risk scenarios

Organization-Defined Values (ODVs) — Common Examples

ControlODV ParameterExample Value
AC-2(3)Disable inactive accounts after [x] days90 days
AU-11Retain audit logs for [x]3 years
CA-7Continuous monitoring frequencyMonthly
IA-5(1)Minimum password length [x]15 characters
SI-2Patch critical vulnerabilities within [x] days30 days

Step 5 — Overlays

Overlays tailor baselines for specific communities, technologies, or environments:

OverlayUse Case
FedRAMP overlayCloud services for federal agencies; adds FedRAMP-specific parameters
DoD/CNSSNational security systems (NSS); applies CNSS Instruction 1253
Intelligence CommunityIC-specific requirements via ICD 503
Privacy overlayOrganizations processing large volumes of PII
Industrial Control SystemsOT/SCADA environments (see SP 800-82)
HealthcareHIPAA-aligned overlay for health IT systems

Step 6 — Control Implementation and SSP Narratives

Each control requires an SSP (System Security Plan) narrative with three components:

SSP Narrative Structure

Control: [AC-2] Account Management

Implementation Status: Implemented / Partially Implemented / Planned / Not Applicable

Implementation Description:
[Describe HOW the control is implemented for this specific system — 
technology, process, and people. Reference specific tools, policies, 
and procedures by name.]

Responsible Roles:
[ISSO, System Owner, IT Operations, etc.]

Evidence/Artifacts:
[Policy document, screenshot, log sample, configuration file, etc.]

Common SSP pitfalls:

  • Generic statements ("We have a firewall") instead of system-specific implementation
  • Not addressing all control parameters and ODVs
  • Missing inherited vs. system-specific control designations
  • Not distinguishing base control from enhancements

Step 7 — Assessment (SP 800-53A Rev 5)

SP 800-53A Rev 5 provides assessment procedures for every control. Three assessment methods:

MethodDescription
ExamineReview documentation, specifications, policies, procedures
InterviewDiscuss implementation with personnel (ISSO, admins, users)
TestExercise the control mechanism (scan, penetration test, configuration check)

Assessment findings:

  • Satisfied — control fully implemented and effective
  • Other Than Satisfied (OTS) — weakness or deficiency found; document in POA&M

Step 8 — RMF Integration and Framework Mapping

Reference file: references/assessment-rmf.md for RMF step-by-step guidance, continuous monitoring strategy, OSCAL, and cross-framework mapping details.

Risk Management Framework (RMF) — SP 800-37 Rev 2 Steps

StepNameKey Output
1PrepareRisk management roles, system categorization, control selection strategy
2CategorizeFIPS 199 system categorization (SC document)
3SelectBaseline + tailoring = control selection (SSP control list)
4ImplementSSP implementation descriptions
5AssessSAR (Security Assessment Report) using SP 800-53A
6AuthorizeATO or DATO decision by Authorizing Official
7MonitorConMon strategy; continuous assessment; POA&M management

Cross-Framework Mapping

FrameworkRelationship to SP 800-53
FedRAMPUses SP 800-53 Moderate/High baseline + FedRAMP overlay parameters
FISMASP 800-53 is the mandatory control catalog for all federal systems
CMMC 2.0Level 2 maps to NIST SP 800-171 (derived from SP 800-53 Moderate)
ISO 27001:2022Annex A controls map to SP 800-53 families; significant overlap
CSF 2.0CSF functions/subcategories map to SP 800-53 controls (SP 800-53B Appendix C)
HIPAASecurity Rule maps to SP 800-53 controls (HHS crosswalk)
PCI DSS v4.0Requirements map to SC, IA, AC, AU, SI families

Reference Files

When deeper detail is needed, read these reference files:

ReferenceContents
references/control-families.mdAll 20 families with key controls, baseline assignments (L/M/H), enhancement details, implementation tips, and common assessment findings
references/baselines-tailoring.mdSP 800-53B baseline tables, tailoring guidance, ODV examples, overlay application, and privacy/supply chain baseline specifics
references/assessment-rmf.mdSP 800-53A assessment procedures, RMF step-by-step, continuous monitoring, OSCAL guidance, POA&M management, and cross-framework mapping detail

This skill provides general compliance information, not legal advice. Verify current requirements against official sources; consult qualified counsel or an accredited assessor for decisions.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Public-safe preliminary screen for challenges to the impartiality of an AI evaluator, LLM-as-a-judge, decision-support agent, or adjudicative system based on prior outputs, suspected bias, unstable reasoning, or self-reinforcing memory. Use when asked whether an AI should be recused, disqualified, replaced, audited, or escalated. Does not decide real cases or claim that human judicial-recusal doctrine automatically applies.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8952026年10月20日 更新

Creates an Agent Authority Charter for enterprise or regulated AI agents before deployment. Use this Skill when a user needs to define what an AI agent is allowed to do, who delegated authority to it, what actions are permitted or prohibited, when human approval is required, what evidence must be preserved, and how the agent can be suspended, revoked, or escalated.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8952026年10月20日 更新

EU AI Act Knowledge Engine — authoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents (including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification — general principles, Annex I, Annex III). Answers any question about the AI Act with article-level citations from the full regulation text, Commission guidelines, EDPB/EDPS opinions, codes of practice, harmonised standards, FRIA guides, incident templates, and sector-specific guidance. This skill should be used when the user asks about the "EU AI Act", "AI Act regulation", "Regulation 2024/1689", "KI-Verordnung", asks to "explain an AI Act article", "what does Article X say", "AI Act requirements", "AI Act penalties", "AI Act timeline", "GPAI obligations", "high-risk AI", "prohibited AI practices", "AI Act and GDPR", "fundamental rights impact assessment", "AI Act standards", "AI Act national implementation", "AI literacy", "serious incident reporting", "Digital Omnibus", "AI regulatory sandbox", or any question about EU artificial intelligence regulation. Also triggers on German terms: "KI-Gesetz", "KI-Verordnung", "Hochrisiko-KI", "KI-Kompetenz", "Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung", "GPAI-Verhaltenskodex". For assessment workflows that produce a classification decision rather than a knowledge answer, offer to run a structured risk-tier classification in-session.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8952026年10月20日 更新

This skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output was verified, and what was ultimately relied upon. It documents the workflow for supervision and later review without ruling on privilege or disclosure, so the record stays accurate rather than self-serving.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8952026年10月20日 更新

Use this skill when the user wants an AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk review of an internal AI use case, an AI product feature, an LLM workflow, or a third-party AI vendor. The skill asks intake and clarifying questions first when facts or evidence are missing, identifies required documentation and missing evidence, maps the use case to AI governance frameworks and applicable legal domains, and produces a preliminary or final governance review with scorecards, findings, owners, remediation actions, and follow-up questions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8952026年10月20日 更新

Turn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable. Produces a multi-page website (default), a single-page interactive site, a Microsoft Word document, a PowerPoint deck, or a LaTeX/PDF. Use whenever a user has a stress-test result, ambiguity audit, or "where will this be litigated" scenarios and wants to publish, present, or share them. Triggers on "publish the audit," "make a report from this," "turn this into a website / deck / brief / Word doc," "make a Netlify site," "build slides of these ambiguities," "render the scenarios," "package this stress test," "produce a LaTeX version," and similar. Pairs with the ambiguity-stress-test skill (the underlying analysis) but works on any structured or semi-structured ambiguity analysis. Visual design is opinionated but the user can override colors, fonts, and brand label. Most formats need Python and a writable filesystem; single-file HTML works where the host has neither.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8952026年10月20日 更新

查看 lawve-ai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题