跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

horizon-scanning

Use when the user asks "what is coming next?", wants strategic forecasting, or is hunting weak signals of emerging threats before they materialise. Covers signal identification, trend analysis, and scenario development.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Horizon Scanning

Horizon scanning identifies emerging threats, opportunities, and developments that could impact the organisation's security posture in the medium to long term (6-24 months).

Process

1. Define Scope

  • Time horizon (6 months? 12 months? 24 months?)
  • Focus areas (specific sectors, threat types, geographies)
  • Stakeholder needs (what decisions will this inform?)

2. Identify Weak Signals

Weak signals are early indicators of emerging trends. Sources:

  • Academic research and conference papers (BlackHat, DEF CON, CCC, academic journals)
  • Underground forum discussions (new tools, techniques being discussed)
  • Patent filings and startup activity (indicators of new capabilities)
  • Geopolitical developments (sanctions, conflicts, elections)
  • Regulatory changes (new compliance requirements creating new attack surfaces)
  • Technology adoption trends (new tech = new attack surface)

3. Categorise Signals

CategoryExamples
Emerging TTPsNew exploitation techniques, novel social engineering methods, AI-augmented attacks
Technology shiftsNew platforms widely adopted, legacy tech being deprecated, cloud migration patterns
Threat actor evolutionNew groups emerging, existing groups changing targets, capability development
Geopolitical driversConflicts, sanctions, elections, diplomatic shifts
Regulatory/legalNew laws, enforcement actions, liability changes
Underground economyNew services, market shifts, ecosystem changes

4. Develop Scenarios

For each significant signal, develop three scenarios:

  • Best case: Signal does not materialise or is mitigated
  • Worst case: Signal materialises with maximum impact
  • Most likely: Balanced assessment based on available evidence

5. Assess Impact and Likelihood

For each scenario:

  • Likelihood (using probability yardstick from likelihood-language skill)
  • Impact on organisation (Critical/High/Moderate/Low/Negligible)
  • Time to materialise
  • Confidence in assessment

6. Identify Early Warning Indicators

For each high-impact scenario, define:

  • What observable indicators would suggest this is materialising?
  • Where would we see these indicators? (collection sources)
  • How frequently should we monitor?

Output Template

## Horizon Scanning Report: [Focus Area]
**Period**: [Time horizon]
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD

### Executive Summary
[Key emerging threats and their implications]

### Emerging Threats

#### [Threat 1]: [Title]
- **Signal strength**: Weak / Emerging / Established
- **Time horizon**: [When could this materialise?]
- **Likelihood**: [Probability yardstick term]
- **Potential impact**: [Critical/High/Moderate/Low]
- **Confidence**: [Level with rationale]
- **Description**: [What is this threat and why does it matter?]
- **Early warning indicators**: [What to watch for]
- **Recommended action**: [Proactive steps]

### Scenario Analysis
[For top 2-3 threats, develop best/worst/most likely scenarios]

### Collection Gaps
[What we need to monitor but currently can't]

Common Signals to Monitor (CTI)

  • AI-powered phishing/deepfakes maturation
  • Quantum computing impact on cryptography
  • Supply chain security tooling gaps
  • Cloud-native attack technique evolution
  • Ransomware business model evolution
  • Nation-state cyber capability proliferation
  • Infostealer-to-ransomware pipeline evolution
  • Edge device/IoT exploitation trends

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

AbuseIPDB API reference. IP reputation and abuse report lookups.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills272026年9月30日 更新

ach

免费

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses — structured technique for evaluating multiple explanations against evidence. Use when facing ambiguous attribution or multiple plausible scenarios. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Runs on ungraded evidence when asked, labelled as such, unweighted, and capped at Moderate confidence.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills272026年9月30日 更新

Use when documenting a named campaign across time and victims, the user asks to start or update a campaign record, or another skill identified a multi-incident cluster that warrants formal tracking. Provides the template (timeline, attribution, victimology, attack chain, Diamond Model mapping, IOC clusters) and the lifecycle from active to historical.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills272026年9月30日 更新

Use when the user asks about carding, BIN attacks, payment-card breach markets, fullz/CVV2 trade, autoshops (BidenCash, Brian's Club, Russianmarket, B1ack's Stash), or financial-fraud TTPs. Self-updating knowledge cell.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills272026年9月30日 更新

Censys API v2 reference. Host reconnaissance and certificate data.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills272026年9月30日 更新

Use when the user asks about Chinese state-sponsored cyber operations or specific PRC-aligned actors (APT41, Volt Typhoon, Mustang Panda, APT10, APT31, Salt Typhoon, etc.), MSS/PLA-attributed campaigns, or PRC sector targeting. Self-updating knowledge cell.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Liberty91LTD/cti-skills272026年9月30日 更新

查看 Liberty91LTD 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题