AbuseIPDB API reference. IP reputation and abuse report lookups.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user asks to create, review, retire, or refine Priority Intelligence Requirements, or wants to align collection and analysis to the current PIR set. Covers the PIR lifecycle end-to-end.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
PIRs are the foundation of relevant intelligence. They define what stakeholders need to know and drive all collection and analysis priorities. Without PIRs, a CTI team produces intelligence nobody asked for.
A PIR is a question that, when answered, directly supports a stakeholder's decision-making. PIRs are:
Each PIR should be:
Store in data/pirs/active/PIR-XXX-<slug>.md:
---
pir_id: PIR-001
title: "What ransomware groups are actively targeting the European healthcare sector?"
created: 2026-01-15
review_date: 2026-04-15
status: active
priority: high
stakeholder: CISO
collection_sources: [osint, virustotal, otx]
knowledge_cells: [ransomware-ecosystem]
last_satisfied: 2026-03-01
satisfaction_count: 3
---
## Context
Why this PIR matters to the stakeholder. What decisions depend on the answer.
## Standing Requirements
- Monitor for new ransomware campaigns targeting healthcare
- Track ransomware group infrastructure changes
- Assess likelihood of targeting our specific organisation
## Collection Guidance
- OSINT: Monitor vendor reports, ISAC feeds, government advisories
- Technical: Enrich IOCs from healthcare-targeted campaigns
- Dark web: Monitor ransomware leak sites for healthcare victims
## Satisfaction History
| Date | Product | Summary |
|------|---------|---------|
| 2026-03-01 | Flash Report FR-2026-03-01 | New BlackCat campaign targeting EU hospitals |
| 2026-02-15 | Intelligence Summary IS-2026-02-15 | Monthly ransomware landscape update |
For each active PIR:
When intelligence answering a PIR is produced:
last_satisfied datesatisfaction_countFor each active PIR:
When a PIR is no longer needed:
status: retireddata/pirs/active/ to data/pirs/archive/| Priority | Criteria | Collection Effort |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Imminent threat to organisation, board-level concern, regulatory requirement | Dedicated resources, daily monitoring |
| High | Active threat landscape relevant to organisation, CISO priority | Regular monitoring, weekly reporting |
| Medium | General awareness need, emerging threat area | Periodic collection, monthly reporting |
| Low | Background intelligence, professional development | Opportunistic collection |
The orchestrator should:
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
AbuseIPDB API reference. IP reputation and abuse report lookups.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Analysis of Competing Hypotheses — structured technique for evaluating multiple explanations against evidence. Use when facing ambiguous attribution or multiple plausible scenarios. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Runs on ungraded evidence when asked, labelled as such, unweighted, and capped at Moderate confidence.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when documenting a named campaign across time and victims, the user asks to start or update a campaign record, or another skill identified a multi-incident cluster that warrants formal tracking. Provides the template (timeline, attribution, victimology, attack chain, Diamond Model mapping, IOC clusters) and the lifecycle from active to historical.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user asks about carding, BIN attacks, payment-card breach markets, fullz/CVV2 trade, autoshops (BidenCash, Brian's Club, Russianmarket, B1ack's Stash), or financial-fraud TTPs. Self-updating knowledge cell.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Censys API v2 reference. Host reconnaissance and certificate data.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user asks about Chinese state-sponsored cyber operations or specific PRC-aligned actors (APT41, Volt Typhoon, Mustang Panda, APT10, APT31, Salt Typhoon, etc.), MSS/PLA-attributed campaigns, or PRC sector targeting. Self-updating knowledge cell.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。