跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

to-tickets

Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into vertical-slice tickets, each declaring its blocking edges.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

To Tickets

Break a plan, spec, or conversation into a set of tickets — thin end-to-end vertical slices, each declaring the tickets that block it. Tickets are markdown files stored per the aiwork-protocol skill.

Process

1. Gather context

Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes a reference (a spec path, an .aiwork/ folder) as an argument, read it fully.

2. Explore the codebase (optional)

If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Ticket titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching. If a ticket contradicts an ADR, flag it in the ticket rather than silently overriding it.

Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change."

3. Draft vertical slices

Break the work into vertical-slice tickets.

<vertical-slice-rules>
  • Each slice cuts a narrow but COMPLETE path through every layer (schema, API, UI, tests) — vertical, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer
  • A completed slice is demoable or verifiable on its own
  • Each slice is sized to fit in a single fresh context window
  • Any prefactoring should be done first
</vertical-slice-rules>

Give each ticket its blocking edges — the other tickets that must complete before it can start. A ticket with no blockers can start immediately.

Wide refactors are the exception to vertical slicing. A wide refactor is one mechanical change — rename a column, retype a shared symbol — whose blast radius fans across the whole codebase, so a single edit breaks thousands of call sites at once and no vertical slice can land green. Don't force it into a vertical slice; sequence it as expand–contract. First expand: add the new form beside the old so nothing breaks. Then migrate the call sites over in batches sized by blast radius (per package, per directory), each batch its own ticket blocked by the expand, keeping CI green batch to batch because the old form still exists. Finally contract: delete the old form once no caller remains, in a ticket blocked by every migrate batch. When even the batches can't stay green alone, keep the sequence but let them share an integration branch that all block a final integrate-and-verify ticket — green is promised only there.

4. Quiz the user

Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each ticket, show:

  • Title: short descriptive name
  • Blocked by: which other tickets (if any) must complete first
  • What it delivers: the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work

Ask the user:

  • Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine)
  • Are the blocking edges correct — does each ticket only depend on tickets that genuinely gate it?
  • Should any tickets be merged or split further?

Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.

5. Save the tickets

Load the aiwork-protocol skill (if not already loaded) and follow its folder and tickets/ conventions. Use the task's existing folder if one exists — one task, one folder.

Use the template below — one ticket per file, never a single combined file. Blocking edges and status live in frontmatter so they stay machine-scannable.

Do NOT modify the source spec or plan.

<ticket-template>
---
status: ready # ready | in-progress | done
blocked_by: [] # ticket file numbers, e.g. [01, 02]
references:
  - "Spec: ../spec.md"
---

# <NN> — <Ticket title>

**What to build:** the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective — not a layer-by-layer implementation list.

## Acceptance criteria

- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2
</ticket-template>

Avoid specific file paths or code snippets — they go stale fast. Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.

Working the tickets

Work the frontier: any ticket whose blockers are all done. For a purely linear chain that means top to bottom. Implement one ticket at a time in a fresh session, updating its status as you go, and clearing context between tickets.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Structure AI work artifacts under .aiwork/{YYYY-MM-DD}_{slug}/ folders using the project's protocol (intent, triage, research, spec, prd, areas, plan, review, notes, docs/). Use when the user asks to plan, capture an intent, make a spec, triage, research a task, write a report, code review, summarize findings, save the work, document decisions, record this, write that down, persist findings, or references any path under .aiwork/. Also use when starting a non-trivial task that needs a plan or spec before implementation, or when finishing one and capturing notes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

lttr/claude-marketplace22026年10月22日 更新

Use this skill when the user asks to test, verify, interact with, or automate web pages and browsers. Trigger for requests involving Chrome automation, browser testing, web scraping, screenshot capture, element selection, or checking web applications. Also trigger when user mentions "browser tools" explicitly.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

lttr/claude-marketplace22026年10月22日 更新

changelog

免费

Show recent Claude Code changes personalized to user's setup. Trigger when user asks about changelog, "what's new", "cc changelog", "claude code updates", "recent changes", or wants to know what changed in Claude Code.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

lttr/claude-marketplace22026年10月22日 更新

Review code changes from current branch, an Azure DevOps PR, a git ref, or a diff/patch file. Trigger when user says "review this", "code review", "/df:code-review", or provides a PR id/URL, ticket URL, git ref, or diff path. Read-only — never posts comments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

lttr/claude-marketplace22026年10月22日 更新

Review code changes from the current branch, staged changes, a git ref, or a diff/patch file. Pure git-native — no platform/PR awareness. Trigger when user says "review this", "review diff", "/aiwork:code-review-diff", or provides a git ref or diff path. Read-only — never posts comments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

lttr/claude-marketplace22026年10月22日 更新

Czech typography rules for web development. Use when building web pages in Czech language, writing Czech content, or fixing typography issues in Czech text. Covers punctuation, dashes, quotes, numbers, units, non-breaking spaces, and HTML entities.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

lttr/claude-marketplace22026年10月22日 更新

查看 lttr 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题