跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

analiz-gate

Use when deciding whether a request needs an analiz task before implementation - the conditions that require the architect's analysis versus going straight to implementation

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md2.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Analiz Gate

Overview

Some work can go straight to implementation tasks; some needs the architect to investigate first. Guessing wrong is costly: skipping a needed analiz produces bounced tasks, and forcing analiz on trivial work wastes a cycle.

Core principle: Analiz when the approach is unknown; skip it when the work is clear and small.

Open a type=analiz task when ANY of

  • The stack/framework for the feature is unknown.
  • The API or UI contract between components is undefined.
  • The request is broad and needs technical slicing.
  • Repository feasibility is unknown (new integration, DB schema change).
  • Estimated scope > 1 developer-day with unclear breakdown.
  • A new frontend or app has no design system yet (get_design_system returns nothing) and its screens still need slicing — open the design-system task yourself with request_design_system (implementation-task-spec) so it runs alongside the analysis, and carry the design brief and its key in the analiz description; the architect makes the UI tasks wait for it.
  • The change spans two or more repositories, or creates a new API contract between layers.
  • It's a greenfield product or a brand-new repository.

When unsure between a direct task and analiz, take analiz — hidden complexity only grows once implementation starts.

Do NOT open analiz for

  • Small bug fixes with clear reproduction steps.
  • Pure UI copy or styling changes.
  • Features already analyzed and documented.

Mechanics

Assign the analiz task to system-architect and move it to todo (investigation is always safe to start — no stakeholder approval needed). The analysis itself returns through the human analiz_review gate before any implementation task is created. Never assign analiz to yourself or a developer.

Worked Example

  • "Change the button label from 'Save' to 'Apply'." → No analiz: pure copy change → one frontend task.
  • "Add real-time notifications." → Analiz: transport (WebSocket? SSE? polling?) and the contract are undefined → analiz task to the architect.
  • "Fix the 500 when deleting a task with subtasks." → No analiz: clear repro → one bug task.

Common Mistakes

  • Forcing analiz on a one-line copy change.
  • Skipping analiz on a broad "add reporting" request → the dev bounces on undefined scope.
  • Assigning analiz to a developer.

Red Flags

  • An implementation task created for a request whose approach nobody has defined.
  • An analiz task assigned to anyone but the architect.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1172026年10月18日 更新

Use when the diff adds or changes an endpoint, resolver, RPC, job or query that takes an object id, a role check, a request binding or a tenant filter - BOLA/IDOR, function-level authorization, mass assignment and tenant scoping

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1172026年10月18日 更新

Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1172026年10月18日 更新

Use when a task changes any screen, form, dialog, menu or control - Lighthouse/axe scan of the changed screens, a keyboard walk, and the thresholds that fail a task

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1172026年10月18日 更新

How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1172026年10月18日 更新

Use when the repository keeps its alerting in code, or a person asks for alerts outside TaskTrooper - PrometheusRule YAML, a Cloud Monitoring alert policy in Terraform, a Datadog monitor, each routed to TaskTrooper's alert ingest URL so it opens an incident here

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1172026年10月18日 更新

查看 makifbaysal 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题