跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

offline-sync

Use when a screen must work without network or a mutation must survive a lost connection - local storage choice, the outbox pattern with idempotency keys, background replay, and how to test it with a fake clock and fake network.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Offline and Sync

Overview

Treat "offline" as a normal state, not an error condition: a screen that only works with a live connection is a defect on mobile. The hard part isn't detecting offline — it's making a queued mutation replay exactly once and keeping the UI honest about what's actually saved.

Local store

Follow the repo's existing choice (drift/sqflite for Flutter, Room for Android, SwiftData/Core Data for iOS) — don't introduce a second local-storage mechanism alongside one that's already there.

Outbox pattern

  • Queue mutations in a local outbox table when offline; replay on reconnect.
  • Every queued mutation carries a client-generated idempotency key, sent with the eventual request, so a retried replay (after a crash mid-sync, or a flaky connection that "succeeded" without the ack arriving) is deduplicated server-side instead of double-applied.
  • Connectivity plugins (connectivity_plus and equivalents) report the state of the network interface, not whether the server is actually reachable — treat the server's response as the source of truth for whether a request succeeded, not the interface state alone.

Background replay

  • Android: WorkManager (native) or the workmanager plugin (Flutter) for replay that must survive the app being backgrounded or killed.
  • iOS: BGTaskScheduler for background replay — register and schedule it, and test on-device since the simulator's background scheduling is unreliable.

UI honesty

Show sync status explicitly per item — pending / syncing / failed — never render an unsynced change as if it were already saved. A spinner that never resolves is worse than an honest "failed, tap to retry."

Conflicts

Pick one conflict rule per data type (last-write-wins, or an explicit user choice when both sides changed) and write it down in the task — don't leave it implicit in the code for the next person to infer.

Reads degrade gracefully

Cached data with a staleness indicator beats a spinner that never resolves — show what you have, mark it as possibly stale, and update when the network returns.

Testing

  • Unit tests: a fake clock and a fake network/repository to drive queue → replay → ack deterministically, including the "replay happens twice" case to prove the idempotency key actually dedupes.
  • On a local emulator: adb shell cmd connectivity airplane-mode enable / disable to exercise a real reconnect, not just a mocked one.

Common Mistakes

  • A screen that shows a blank/error state the instant the network drops, instead of cached data.
  • A queued mutation with no idempotency key — a retried replay double-applies it.
  • Trusting the connectivity plugin's "online" state as proof a request will succeed.
  • A sync-status UI that doesn't distinguish pending from failed.
  • Only testing airplane-mode-on; never testing the reconnect/replay path.

Red Flags

  • A mutation sent to the server with no client-generated key the server can dedupe on.
  • "It works offline" verified only by reading the code, not by actually toggling airplane mode or a fake network.
  • No written conflict rule for a data type that can be edited from two places.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when writing acceptance criteria for a task - express each as an observable Given/When/Then that QA can execute, including negative cases

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1172026年10月20日 更新

Use when the diff adds or changes an endpoint, resolver, RPC, job or query that takes an object id, a role check, a request binding or a tenant filter - BOLA/IDOR, function-level authorization, mass assignment and tenant scoping

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1172026年10月20日 更新

Use on every UI change - semantic HTML, labels for controls, keyboard-navigable dialogs/menus, visible focus, and never color as the only signal

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1172026年10月20日 更新

Use when a task changes any screen, form, dialog, menu or control - Lighthouse/axe scan of the changed screens, a keyboard walk, and the thresholds that fail a task

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1172026年10月20日 更新

How to work a task returned with review, QA or UAT findings. Use when a task is in need_revision or PR review comments are in your context.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1172026年10月20日 更新

Use when the repository keeps its alerting in code, or a person asks for alerts outside TaskTrooper - PrometheusRule YAML, a Cloud Monitoring alert policy in Terraform, a Datadog monitor, each routed to TaskTrooper's alert ingest URL so it opens an incident here

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

makifbaysal/tasktrooper1172026年10月20日 更新

查看 makifbaysal 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题