Design or review .NET solution architecture across modular monoliths, clean architecture, vertical slices, microservices, DDD, CQRS, and cloud-native boundaries without over-engineering.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use a repo-root `.editorconfig` to configure free .NET analyzer and style rules. Use when a .NET repo needs rule severity, code-style options, section layout, or analyzer ownership made explicit. Nested `.editorconfig` files are allowed when they serve a clear subtree-specific purpose.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
.editorconfigAGENTS.md.editorconfigDirectory.Build.props overridesAGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.Required Result Format with concrete artifacts and verification evidence..editorconfig with root = true..editorconfig files when a subtree has a clear scoped purpose, such as stricter rules, different generated-code handling, or a different policy for tests or legacy code..editorconfig, not scattered through IDE settings..NET variant:
.editorconfigroot = true in the preambleEnableNETAnalyzers in MSBuild files, not in .editorconfig..globalconfig as an exceptional case, not the normal repo setup.If analyzer configuration is requested but not structured yet:
rg --files -g '.editorconfig' -g '.globalconfig'rg -n "EnableNETAnalyzers|AnalysisLevel|AnalysisMode" -g '*.csproj' -g 'Directory.Build.*' ..editorconfig with root = true..editorconfig and keep bulk analyzer switches in project or MSBuild config..editorconfig files only when a subtree really needs different scoped policy.dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT and return status: configured or status: improved.status: not_applicable..editorconfig layout that agents can extend safely.editorconfig, not a surprise alternativeUse the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.
status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.status: complete | clean | improved | configured | not_applicable | blockedplan: concise plan and current iteration stepactions_taken: concrete changes madevalidation_skills: final skills run, or skipped with reasonsverification: commands, checks, or review evidence summaryremaining: top unresolved items or noneFor setup-only requests with no execution, return status: configured and exact next commands.
references/analyzer-config.mdreferences/template.mdreferences/rules.md.editorconfig the source of truth.".editorconfig for this repo."还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Design or review .NET solution architecture across modular monoliths, clean architecture, vertical slices, microservices, DDD, CQRS, and cloud-native boundaries without over-engineering.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use the open-source free `ArchUnitNET` library for architecture rules in .NET tests. Use when a repo needs richer architecture assertions than lightweight fluent rule libraries usually provide.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use the free built-in .NET SDK analyzers and analysis levels with gradual Roslyn warning promotion. Use when a .NET repo needs first-party code analysis, `EnableNETAnalyzers`, `AnalysisLevel`, or warning-as-error policy wired into build and CI.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use free built-in .NET maintainability analyzers and code metrics configuration to find overly complex methods and coupled code. Use when a repo needs cyclomatic complexity checks, maintainability thresholds, or complexity-driven refactoring gates.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Calculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) score for .NET methods, classes, or files. Use when the user asks to assess test quality, identify risky untested code, compute CRAP scores, or evaluate whether complex methods have sufficient test coverage. Requires code coverage data (Cobertura XML) and cyclomatic complexity analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: writing tests, general test execution unrelated to coverage/CRAP analysis, or general code coverage reporting without CRAP context.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use the open-source free `CSharpier` formatter for C# and XML. Use when a .NET repo intentionally wants one opinionated formatter instead of a highly configurable `dotnet format`-driven style model.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。