MCAF Adoption

Trigger On

• bootstrapping MCAF in a new or existing repository that also contains .NET work
• updating root or project-local AGENTS.md files to follow a durable repo workflow
• deciding which MCAF governance skills and dotnet-* implementation skills to install together
• organizing repo-native docs for architecture, features, ADRs, testing, development, and operations

Workflow

1. Start from the canonical bootstrap surface:

   • tutorial: https://mcaf.managed-code.com/tutorial
   • concepts: https://mcaf.managed-code.com/
   • public MCAF skills: https://mcaf.managed-code.com/skills

2. Place root AGENTS.md at the repository or solution root.

3. Add project-local AGENTS.md only when the solution has multiple projects with genuinely different local rules.

4. Install MCAF governance skills (dotnet-mcaf-*) for process areas and dotnet-* implementation skills for framework work. Check references/skill-map.md for overlap before adding duplicate surfaces.

5. Route to the narrowest MCAF skill once the governance concern is clear:

   Concern	Skill
   Delivery workflow and feedback loops	dotnet-mcaf-agile-delivery
   Developer onboarding and local inner loop	dotnet-mcaf-devex
   Durable docs structure and source-of-truth placement	dotnet-mcaf-documentation
   Executable feature behaviour docs	dotnet-mcaf-feature-spec
   Human review for large AI-generated drops	dotnet-mcaf-human-review-planning
   ML/AI product delivery process	dotnet-mcaf-ml-ai-delivery
   Explicit quality attributes and trade-offs	dotnet-mcaf-nfr
   Branch, merge, and release hygiene	dotnet-mcaf-source-control
   Design-system, accessibility, front-end direction	dotnet-mcaf-ui-ux

6. Scaffold repo-native documentation:

   docs/
   ├── Architecture.md
   ├── Features/
   ├── ADR/
   ├── Testing/
   ├── Development/
   └── Operations/
   

7. Encode the non-trivial task flow in AGENTS.md: <slug>.brainstorm.md then <slug>.plan.md then implementation and validation.

8. Treat verification as part of done: tests, analyzers, formatters, coverage, and any architecture or security gates the repo configured.

flowchart LR
  A["Adopt MCAF"] --> B["Root AGENTS.md"]
  B --> C{"Multi-project?"}
  C -->|Yes| D["Project-local AGENTS.md"]
  C -->|No| E["Root policy only"]
  B --> F["Install mcaf-* governance skills"]
  B --> G["Install dotnet-* implementation skills"]
  D --> H["Document boundaries and commands"]
  E --> H
  F --> I["Repo-native docs scaffolds"]
  G --> J[".NET implementation guidance"]
  H --> K["Run full quality pass"]
  I --> K
  J --> K

Deliver

• repository-ready MCAF adoption with clear root and local AGENTS.md responsibilities
• correct split between mcaf-* governance and dotnet-* implementation skills
• repo-native docs and verification expectations instead of chat-only instructions

Validate

• root AGENTS.md exists at the repository or solution root
• project-local AGENTS.md files exist only where genuinely needed
• repo documents exact build, test, format, analyze, and coverage commands
• durable docs exist for architecture and behavior, not only inline comments
• non-trivial work follows the brainstorm-to-plan flow before implementation
• the full quality pass is part of done, not only a narrow happy-path test run

References

• references/adoption.md - canonical MCAF entry points, bootstrap rules, and the local-mirror boundary between governance and implementation skills
• references/skill-map.md - MCAF catalog map with overlap-vs-new split for precise routing