Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Analyze recent code changes via git history and extract software engineering lessons. Use when the user asks 'what is the lesson here?', 'what can I learn from this?', 'engineering takeaway', 'what did I just learn?', 'reflect on this code', or wants to extract principles from recent work.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Extract specific, grounded software engineering lessons from actual code changes. Not a lecture -- a mirror. Show the user what their code already demonstrates.
Load the principles reference first.
references/se-principles.md to have the principle catalog availablereferences/anti-patterns.md if you suspect the changes include areas for improvementDo not proceed until you've loaded at least se-principles.md.
Ask the user or infer from context what to analyze.
| Scope | Git Commands | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Feature branch | git log main..HEAD --oneline + git diff main...HEAD | User is on a non-main branch (default) |
| Last N commits | git log --oneline -N + git diff HEAD~N..HEAD | User specifies a range, or on main (default N=5) |
| Specific commit | git show <sha> | User references a specific commit |
| Working changes | git diff + git diff --cached | User says "what about these changes?" before committing |
Default behavior:
git log with the determined scope to get the commit list and messagesgit diff for the full diff of the scopegit diff --stat first, then selectively read the top 3-5 most-changed filesIdentify the dominant pattern -- the single most instructive thing about these changes.
Look for:
Map findings to specific principles from references/se-principles.md. Be specific -- quote actual code, reference actual file names and line changes.
Use this template:
## Lesson: [Principle Name]
**What happened in the code:**
[2-3 sentences describing the specific change, referencing files and commits]
**The principle at work:**
[1-2 sentences explaining the SE principle]
**Why it matters:**
[1-2 sentences on the practical consequence -- what would go wrong without this, or what goes right because of it]
**Takeaway for next time:**
[One concrete, actionable sentence the user can apply to future work]
If there is a second lesson worth noting (maximum 2 additional):
---
### Also worth noting: [Principle Name]
**In the code:** [1 sentence]
**The principle:** [1 sentence]
**Takeaway:** [1 sentence]
| Avoid | Why | Instead |
|---|---|---|
| Listing every principle that vaguely applies | Overwhelming and generic | Pick the 1-2 most relevant |
| Analyzing files that were not changed | Scope creep | Stick to the diff |
| Ignoring commit messages | They contain intent that diffs miss | Read them as primary context |
| Abstract advice disconnected from the code | Not actionable | Always reference specific files/lines |
| Negative-only feedback | Demoralizing | Lead with what works, then suggest improvements |
| More than 3 lessons | Dilutes the insight | One well-grounded lesson beats seven vague ones |
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Automate 21risk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Automate 2chat tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Automate Ably tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Automate Abstract tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Automate Abuselpdb tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Automate Abyssale tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。