跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

behavior-design

Use when a goal must be converted into a repeatable behavior, cue, SOP, review cadence, and identity-aligned reinforcement.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills星标 141(GitHub 141 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Behavior Design

<skill_contract> <input>Actor, desired outcome, current behavior, context, constraints, baseline evidence, and review horizon.</input> <output>An agency-preserving HAS behavior system with cues, effort levels, SOP, measures, recovery, and review cadence.</output> <done>The target behavior is observable, runnable on a low-motivation day, evidenced, and assigned one review owner.</done> <non_goals>Coercion, unsupported identity claims, vague motivation advice, or optimizing lagging outcomes without behaviors.</non_goals>

Convert an outcome into the smallest observable behavior system that can survive low-motivation days. Preserve agency; optimize the environment before blaming the actor.

Usage Template

Provide: desired outcome, actor, context, current behavior, constraints, review horizon, and available evidence. Optional: failed attempts and environmental cues.

Workflow

<intake>
  1. Restate the outcome as an observable change, not an identity label.
  2. Establish baseline frequency, friction, trigger context, and hard constraints.
  3. Separate controllable behavior from lagging outcome.
  4. Set one review horizon and one owner.
</intake>

<unknowns_gate>

Classify unknowns as known, probeable, testable, or blocked. If actor, target behavior, or safety boundary is absent, return NEEDS_INPUT with one minimal question. A reversible assumption is allowed only when labeled and paired with a same-cycle test.

</unknowns_gate>

<execute>

Build the HAS sequence:

  1. H1 Goal: translate the outcome into one leading behavior and one lagging measure.
  2. H2 Habit: define anchor, cue, location, and three effort levels: minimum (about 2 minutes), normal, and stretch.
  3. H3 SOP: write trigger -> action -> evidence -> recovery -> stop so a missed run has a next move.
  4. H4 Review: select a cadence; compare planned versus observed behavior and change one variable only.
  5. H5 Identity: use evidence-based reinforcement: “I am becoming X because I repeatedly did Y,” never unsupported affirmation.

Reduce friction before adding motivation. Prefer defaults, visible cues, prepared tools, and short feedback latency. Keep the minimum behavior useful rather than ceremonial.

</execute> <evaluate>

Check that the behavior is observable, starts in a named context, fits the minimum effort budget, produces evidence, and has a recovery path. Reject plans that depend on constant willpower, hide coercion, or measure only outcomes. If the check fails, revise the highest-friction element once and re-evaluate.

</evaluate>

<state_contract>

Persist {run_id, status, attempt, budget, evidence, unknowns, last_error, next_action} plus baseline, current H1-H5 design, review date, and revision history. Update atomically after each review; never overwrite prior observations.

</state_contract>

Failure Protocol

  • NEEDS_INPUT: a target, actor, or boundary is missing; ask one narrow probe.
  • INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE: baseline is unknown; run a short observation period before optimizing.
  • VERIFY_FAILED: the behavior is not observable, feasible, or linked to the outcome; revise one variable.
  • BUDGET_STOP: the review horizon or effort budget is exhausted; preserve state and report the next experiment.

Output Contract

Return status, result (H1-H5 plan), evidence (baseline and measures), unknowns, and next_action (owner plus review date).

Edge Cases

  • Motivation is near zero: keep the cue and reduce the action to a useful minimum; do not expand the reward system.
  • Repeated misses occur despite compliance: treat the goal-behavior link as unverified and test a different leading behavior.

Success Metrics

  • One named cue reliably starts one observable minimum behavior.
  • Execution evidence is captured at the chosen cadence.
  • Reviews change the system using observed friction, not self-judgment.

Quality Gates

  • Outcome, leading behavior, and lagging measure are distinct.
  • Minimum action, recovery path, owner, and review date exist.
  • The design preserves agency and has no coercive mechanism.
  • Completion claims use observed behavior evidence.

</skill_contract>

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable state, and verified write-back.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when property-service operations need an AI plus ontology plus DMAIC design for work orders, dispatch, quotes, evidence, CTQ metrics, and control dashboards.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when a personal or team operating system needs a bounded redesign using Four-C, closed-loop controls, 70/30 allocation, 3B creativity, experiments, and prediction-error learning.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when source material must be transformed into a compact, evidence-aware model for learning, decisions, or an Obsidian concept note.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when a long-running agent task needs context budgeting, checkpointing, compaction, retrieval, or capability-based model routing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

查看 Mark393295827 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题