跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

setup-matt-pocock-skills

为首次使用开发技能整理仓库共用配置,确认任务管理位置、分类标签及术语表和设计决策记录的存放方式,经用户审核后写入配置文档。

原文查看原文说明

Configure this repo for the engineering skills: set up its issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other engineering skills.

集成工具GitHubGitLab
AI 评分90分/ 100查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 首次使用开发技能前的配置
  • 整理任务管理位置和分类标签
  • 确定术语表与设计决策记录的位置

中文介绍

功能

整理开发技能需要参考的仓库共用配置。先检查现有文件和目录结构,再记录任务的管理位置、用于分类的标签,以及术语表和 ADR 的存放位置。ADR 是记录设计决策的文档。配置集中放在 docs/agents/,并在现有的 CLAUDE.md 或 AGENTS.md 中添加引用。

适用场景

适合在首次使用其他开发技能前,统一任务的管理方式。支持通过 GitHub、GitLab 或本地 Markdown 文件管理任务;如果使用其他管理工具,则会记录用户描述的工作流程。也可以讨论多包仓库中的术语表和 ADR 应如何安排。

使用示例

  • “在使用开发技能前,帮我完成初始配置。”
  • “将任务管理配置为使用本地 Markdown 文件。”
  • “我想讨论这个多包仓库中术语表和 ADR 的存放位置。”

注意事项

这是交互式技能,会先让用户审核调查结果和配置草案,再写入文件。只有安装了 triage 才会配置标签。GitHub 操作使用 gh,GitLab 操作使用 glab。完成配置后,可直接编辑 docs/agents/*.md。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

客观评估

AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。

指令清晰度能否看出何时使用、做什么
A良好明确在首次使用其他开发技能前,配置任务管理位置、标签及术语表与 ADR 的布局。
步骤具体性步骤、输入输出和示例是否具体
A良好提供从调查到完成的五个阶段,并列出输出文件和配置文本示例。
安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
A良好要求写入前审核草案,并更新现有配置,不覆盖周围的用户修改。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
B部分不足明确 GitHub 使用 gh、GitLab 使用 glab,但未提供安装或身份验证步骤。

总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月19日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(7)

  • SKILL.md6.8 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml152 B
  • domain.md2.0 KB
  • issue-tracker-github.md4.0 KB
  • issue-tracker-gitlab.md3.7 KB
  • issue-tracker-local.md1.8 KB
  • triage-labels.md1.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Setup Matt Pocock's Skills

Scaffold the per-repo configuration that the engineering skills assume:

  • Issue tracker: where issues live (GitHub by default; local markdown is also supported out of the box)
  • Triage labels: the strings used for the five canonical triage roles
  • Domain docs: where GLOSSARY.md and ADRs live, and the consumer rules for reading them

This is a prompt-driven skill, not a deterministic script. Explore, present what you found, confirm with the user, then write.

Process

1. Explore

Look at the current repo to understand its starting state. Read whatever exists; don't assume:

  • git remote -v and .git/config: is this a GitHub repo? Which one?
  • AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md at the repo root: does either exist? Is there already an ## Agent skills section in either?
  • GLOSSARY.md and GLOSSARY-MAP.md at the repo root
  • docs/adr/ and any src/*/docs/adr/ directories
  • docs/agents/: does this skill's prior output already exist?
  • .scratch/: a sign that a local-markdown issue tracker convention is already in use
  • Is the triage skill installed? (a triage skill folder alongside this one, or triage in your available skills.) This decides whether Section B runs at all.
  • Monorepo signals: a pnpm-workspace.yaml, a workspaces field in package.json, or a populated packages/* with its own src/. These are present only in a genuinely large multi-package repo; their absence means single-context, which is almost every repo.

2. Present findings and ask

Summarise what's present and what's missing. Then take the sections in order. One section, one answer, then the next.

Lead each section with the recommended answer so the user can accept it in a word. Give a one-line explainer only when the choice genuinely branches; skip the section entirely when exploration already settled it (Section B when triage isn't installed, Section C when there's no monorepo).

Section A: Issue tracker.

Explainer: The "issue tracker" is where issues live for this repo. Skills like to-tickets, triage, and to-spec read from and write to it. They need to know whether to call gh issue create, write a markdown file under .scratch/, or follow some other workflow you describe. Pick the place you actually track work for this repo.

Default posture: these skills were designed for GitHub. If a git remote points at GitHub, propose that. If a git remote points at GitLab (gitlab.com or a self-hosted host), propose GitLab. Otherwise (or if the user prefers), offer:

  • GitHub: issues live in the repo's GitHub Issues (uses the gh CLI)
  • GitLab: issues live in the repo's GitLab Issues (uses the glab CLI)
  • Local markdown: issues live as files under .scratch/<feature>/ in this repo (good for solo projects or repos without a remote)
  • Other (Jira, Linear, etc.): ask the user to describe the workflow in one paragraph; the skill will record it as freeform prose

Record the choice in docs/agents/issue-tracker.md. The GitHub and GitLab templates carry a "PRs as a request surface" flag, defaulted off. Leave it off and don't raise it: a user who wants external PRs in the triage queue can flip the flag in the file later.

Section B: Triage label vocabulary. Skip this section entirely if the triage skill isn't installed (exploration told you), since an uninstalled skill needs no labels.

If it is installed, ask exactly one question:

Do you want to keep the default triage labels? (recommended: yes)

The defaults are the five canonical roles, each label string equal to its name: needs-triage, needs-info, ready-for-agent, ready-for-human, wontfix. On yes, write them as-is. Only if the user says no, usually because their tracker already uses other names (e.g. bug:triage for needs-triage), collect the overrides so triage applies existing labels instead of creating duplicates.

Section C: Domain docs. Default to single-context (one GLOSSARY.md + docs/adr/ at the repo root). This fits almost every repo; write it without asking.

Offer multi-context (a root GLOSSARY-MAP.md pointing to per-context GLOSSARY.md files) only when exploration found monorepo signals. Then confirm which layout they want.

3. Confirm and edit

Show the user a draft of:

  • The ## Agent skills block to add to whichever of CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md is being edited (see step 4 for selection rules)
  • The contents of docs/agents/issue-tracker.md, docs/agents/domain.md, and docs/agents/triage-labels.md (the last only when triage is installed)

Let them edit before writing.

4. Write

Pick the file to edit:

  • If CLAUDE.md exists, edit it.
  • Else if AGENTS.md exists, edit it.
  • If neither exists, ask the user which one to create; don't pick for them.

Never create AGENTS.md when CLAUDE.md already exists (or vice versa); always edit the one that's already there.

If an ## Agent skills block already exists in the chosen file, update its contents in-place rather than appending a duplicate. Don't overwrite user edits to the surrounding sections.

The block:

## Agent skills

### Issue tracker

[one-line summary of where issues are tracked]. See `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`.

### Triage labels

[one-line summary of the label vocabulary]. See `docs/agents/triage-labels.md`.

### Domain docs

[one-line summary of layout: "single-context" or "multi-context"]. See `docs/agents/domain.md`.

Include the ### Triage labels sub-block, and write docs/agents/triage-labels.md, only when triage is installed and Section B ran. When it isn't, both are omitted.

When Section B ran on GitHub or GitLab, create each configured label the tracker lacks (gh label create / glab label create).

Then write the docs files using the seed templates in this skill folder as a starting point:

For "other" issue trackers, write docs/agents/issue-tracker.md from scratch using the user's description.

5. Done

Tell the user the setup is complete and which engineering skills will now read from these files. Mention they can edit docs/agents/*.md directly later; re-running this skill is only necessary if they want to switch issue trackers or restart from scratch.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

ask-matt

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

根据任务的规模和阶段,指导你选择相关技能及其使用顺序,涵盖想法梳理、实现和故障排查,帮助确定下一步以及如何衔接后续工作。

  • 选择从想法到实现的步骤
  • 确定故障排查的起点
  • 规划分多次会话完成的开发
mattpocock/skills30.1万2026年10月22日 更新

chief-of-staff

免费有简介AI 评分 60分

在单次会话中协调承担不同任务的子智能体,推进长期目标。后台工作与用户对话同时进行,并改进共享规范、工作环境和后续任务所需的信息访问条件。

  • 协调长期目标中的任务分工
  • 后台推进工作并持续对话
  • 改进共享规范和工作环境
mattpocock/skills30.1万2026年10月22日 更新

claude-handoff

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

将进行中的对话整理为交接摘要,移除敏感信息,明确后续重点、参考资料和建议技能,再启动新的后台智能体,从当前工作目录继续处理任务。

  • 将后续工作交给新的智能体
  • 限定下一次会话的任务范围
  • 整理下一次会话所需的参考资料
mattpocock/skills30.1万2026年10月22日 更新

code-review

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

以指定提交、分支或标签为基准,从开发规范和原始需求两个角度审查代码变更。分别报告规范问题与需求缺漏,便于独立判断两方面的结果。

  • 审查分支或PR的变更
  • 检查指定提交或标签之后的变更
  • 对照已记录的开发规范
mattpocock/skills30.1万2026年10月22日 更新

codebase-design

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

帮助设计用法精简、内部集中处理复杂逻辑的模块。通过统一术语和判断标准,评估模块是否易用、实现替换位置是否合适,以及是否便于测试。

  • 简化模块的调用方式
  • 集中分散的复杂逻辑
  • 选择可替换实现的位置
mattpocock/skills30.1万2026年10月22日 更新

diagnosing-bugs

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

通过能检测具体症状的测试或脚本,调查难以复现的故障和性能下降。缩小失败条件,验证多个原因假设,完成修复后检查原始复现流程及防止复发的测试。

  • 调查难以复现的错误
  • 查找处理速度下降的原因
  • 重复验证间歇性故障
mattpocock/skills30.1万2026年10月22日 更新

查看 mattpocock 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题