WCAG 2.1 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when creating product requirements documents.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Writing: read docs/skills/shared/writing-rule.md before you write a durable artifact.
Write a feature specification or product requirements document (PRD).
When /write-spec runs, activate the Product Manager role — they own PRD creation, user stories, and acceptance criteria. For roadmap-level prioritisation calls, escalate to the Head of Product.
Design-heavy features should also involve the UX Designer (for user flows) and the UI Designer (for component specs) once the PRD has a problem statement. Technical feasibility review happens at the Tech Design phase, not here — the /write-spec output hands off to the Tech Lead who activates for Phase 2.
See .claude/rules/role-triggers.md for the full activation protocol.
/write-spec SSO support for enterprise
/write-spec Users want to export data as CSV
/write-spec We need better onboarding
Accept any of: a feature name, a problem statement, a user request, or a vague idea.
Ask conversationally:
If the project has integrations available:
Resolve the PRD template via the portfolio helper so adopter overrides win when present:
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-read-config.sh"
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh"
template=$(portfolio_resolve_template prd.md) # → custom-templates/prd.md if present, else templates/prd.md
Single-fork adopters (no portfolio block) and adopters with no override fall straight through to templates/prd.md. Adopters who want a customised PRD shape drop their version at <private_repo>/custom-templates/prd.md. See templates/README.md for the path-mirroring convention.
Read .claude/rules/writing-standard.md before drafting. Treat the resolved template as the source of truth: keep required sections, remove empty conditional sections, replace unknown required values with TBD, and delete the guidance comment before filing.
The PRD should include:
# {Feature Name} — PRD
## Problem Statement
## Goals
3–5 specific, measurable outcomes
## Non-Goals
3–5 things explicitly out of scope
## User Stories
As a [user type], I want [capability] so that [benefit]
## Requirements
### Must-Have (P0)
### Nice-to-Have (P1)
### Future (P2)
## Success Metrics
### Leading Indicators (days–weeks)
### Lagging Indicators (weeks–months)
## Open Questions
## Timeline
The list above is illustrative. Use the resolved template's Required and Conditional guidance. Do not add an empty conditional section only because it appears in this example.
After generating the draft: ask if sections need adjustment, offer follow-ups.
Offer to create an epic / feature ticket in the team's tracker with the PRD content.
Part of ApexYard — multi-project SDLC framework for Claude Code · MIT.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
WCAG 2.1 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
WCAG 2.2 AA audit — perceivable, operable, understandable, robust criteria. Deep-dive for /launch-check accessibility.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Browse / search / show / stats AgDRs across the portfolio — recalls "have we decided this before?".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Analytics audit — SDK config, event naming, funnel completeness, dashboards. Deep-dive for /launch-check analytics.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Record per-PR architecture-review approval for design-artifact PRs (required by the architecture gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR architect "approved".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Record per-PR design-review approval (UI merge gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR designer "approved".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。