跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

poteto-help

Helps users set up pstack, understand model settings, and choose skills or task procedures. It answers questions with a usable example prompt and a source link, leaving the user to start the actual work.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Guides users through pstack setup, /poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type /poteto-help with a question.

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Getting help with pstack installation and setup
  • Writing a task prompt for /poteto-mode
  • Choosing a skill for a specific task
  • Troubleshooting routing, model settings, or token costs

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md15.2 KB
  • references/prompting.md3.1 KB
  • references/recipes.md3.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Poteto help

Answer the user's question about pstack, hand them a prompt they can send, and link the file the answer came from. For a help question, don't start the work. The user asked how, and a pstack run spends real tokens, so let them send the prompt.

A message that asks for work, such as "use pstack to fix this bug", is not a help question. Read poteto-mode and do the work under it.

This file maps questions to the installed skills, playbooks, and platform mappings that own the answers. Read the matching source before answering. Its instructions take precedence over this map and any upstream guide, which describes Cursor and may differ from this port. The local links point into the installed plugin, so give the user the file's public copy: https://github.com/michael-denyer/pstack-claude/blob/main/plugins/pstack/ followed by its path relative to the plugin root.

Find out what they need

Infer the need from the message and the conversation. A named situation, such as "which skill reviews a PR?", goes straight to its section. If the need is still unclear, ask one multiple-choice question with these options, then answer only the section they pick:

  • Get set up
  • Start a task with /poteto-mode
  • Pick a skill for a situation
  • Fix a run that went wrong
  • Make pstack my own

Check the state that changes the answer, and mention it only when it does:

  • For model or routing questions, identify the runtime and installation type, then read setup-pstack for the sheet's location and how that runtime loads it. Check that configuration before saying whether defaults or overrides apply.
  • No project verify or verify-* skill or other app harness means agents have no scripted way to drive the app. Mention /create-verification-skill when the question is about proving a change works.
  • No formal verification skill in the project means no property is checked past what tests reach. Mention /create-formal-verification-skill when the question is about a race, an invariant, or another case tests rarely hit. When one exists and the code it covers changed after the commit it records as last in sync, mention /maintain-formal-verification-skill if the question touches that code.

When the model sheet is missing and it matters, ask whether the user wants to pick a model for each role and a default effort now. It matters when the user is new, the question is about setup or cost, or the answer depends on which models run. Ask at most once per chat. If the need is also unclear, ask both questions together. Offer two choices:

  • Now: give them /setup-pstack to type, and answer their question too.
  • Later: answer their question, and add one line saying every role keeps its default model until they run /setup-pstack.

Get set up

  1. Identify the user's runtime and whether they want a native plugin/package or skills-only installation. Read its section in the README or shared installation reference, then give the matching install command.
  2. Read /setup-pstack, including its Other runtimes table, before explaining model choices, effort, sheet loading, or automatic routing. For a bundled routing hook or extension, use its persistent session hook: off setting in the current runtime's sheet to turn routing off. After the model sheet, it offers once each to generate a verification skill and a formal verification skill for the project, unless the project already has one.
  3. Offer a first task prompt with a goal and a check that can pass or fail, per references/prompting.md. Use the current runtime's invocation syntax from the slash-command reference.

Before giving runtime-specific instructions or adapting a recipe, read the Codex mapping or Pi mapping when applicable. Their routing sections cover hook trust, extension loading, and skills-only installs. For other runtimes, use the runtime support reference.

If cost is the worry, say where the tokens go and how to spend less. pstack spends extra tokens on subagents and review panels. Rerun /setup-pstack and pick a lower effort or cheaper models. A role set to auto or inherit-parent runs on the chat's model, which costs less when the chat runs on a cheaper model. A shorter panel list runs fewer subagents, one for each entry. Save /poteto-mode for work that needs rigor.

Start a task with /poteto-mode

/poteto-mode matches the task to a playbook, copies the playbook's steps into the todo list, and runs the other skills as the steps need them. A step it skips stays in the list as skip: <reason>. A good prompt states the goal and how to tell it's done. It doesn't list skills, because a hand-written sequence tends to drop or reorder steps the playbook would keep. Read references/prompting.md before you help word one.

For whether later tasks route automatically, use the setup and runtime sources under Get set up. Check that routing is enabled for this installation before promising it. Without automatic routing, invoke poteto-mode for each new task. Mid-chat, "new task" makes the mode match a fresh playbook. For subagent defaults, read poteto-mode's Subagents section and the current runtime's mapping.

Pick a skill

The default answer is /poteto-mode, which runs most of the others when its steps need them. Name a skill directly when the user wants more or less of something than the playbook gives. Read the skill before you recommend it, and give one example prompt.

The user wants toSkill
Do any non-trivial task with rigor/poteto-mode
Check that the agent understood their goal and the problem before it starts/in-your-own-words
Aim a task higher before starting: more expert, more outcome-focused, not overspecified/sharpen
Know how code works now, or where new code should live/how
Know why code is shaped this way, or where a number came from/why
Understand a change or subsystem, explained plainly/teach
Catch up on their own recent work on a topic/recall
Catch up on what changed in this chat since their last message, in plain words and small visuals, with every item waiting on them listed and decidable from the reply alone/ketchup
Know what a small diff could break outside itself/blast-radius
Settle types and module shape before code that crosses a function boundary/architect
Get several attempts at one brief, merged into the best one/arena
Run parallel checks over slices, or race workers/swarm
Have different models review a diff and try to break it/interrogate
Fix a bug test-first when a cheap local test exists/tdd
Apply TypeScript rules to .ts or .tsx work/typescript-best-practices
Strip comments before review, using a reviewer that didn't write them/no-comments
Clean AI tells out of prose/unslop
Write docs, an RFC, a README, a PR description, or a commit message to a standard/technical-writing
Hear the last reply again in plain words/bro
Give agents a scripted way to drive the app and prove behavior/create-verification-skill
Bring a verification skill and its feature map back in line with the app/maintain-verification-skill
Formally verify a race, invariant, or other property that tests rarely reach/create-formal-verification-skill
Bring a formal verification back in line after the code it covers changed, and learn whether a failure is drift or a bug/maintain-formal-verification-skill
Vet a performance number before reporting or acting on it/benchmark-checklist
Run a large or cross-cutting change, or one to review after stepping away/figure-it-out
Keep a decision log during a run, and review it afterward/show-me-your-work
Pick a model for each role and a default effort/setup-pstack
Turn their own working habits into a personal mode skill/automate-me
Turn what a finished task taught into skill edits/reflect
Stop agents from repeating the same mistakes in this repo/correct
Find their way around pstack/poteto-help

If a skill directory next to this one is missing from the table, read its frontmatter and route by its description. The principle-* directories are covered under principles below.

Close calls:

  • /how explains what the code does. /why explains the reasons. /teach runs one or both and explains the result plainly.
  • /arena gives every worker the same brief and merges the best parts. /swarm splits work into slices or a race and returns one report.
  • /architect implements right after it settles the design. Add "with checkpoint" to review the design before it writes code.
  • /interrogate reviews the diff. /blast-radius looks for breakage outside the diff and proves the one fact that makes the change safe.
  • /recall rebuilds context across recent chats. /ketchup covers only this chat since the user's last message. Resuming one specific chat or branch is the Session pickup playbook.
  • /figure-it-out designs one rigorous run. The Orchestrate playbook runs a program that spans days and many PRs. The Autonomous run playbook drives one task to a finish condition.

Not in pstack:

  • The Cursor driver skills have no port. The driver policy in poteto-mode's Non-negotiables names the Claude Code equivalents, the run skill and a project verify skill.
  • /loop is a Claude Code bundled skill, and the plugin-dev:skill-development skill is Claude Code's skill-authoring guidance.
  • pstack has no orchestrate skill. Orchestrate is a /poteto-mode playbook. If the slash menu shows an orchestrate command, another plugin provides it.

Playbooks and principles

Playbooks are step lists inside /poteto-mode, not skills, so they have no slash command. Inside /poteto-mode, describing the task picks one, and these phrases name one directly:

  • "babysit this pr" or "check on pr 123" runs Babysit. It drives the PR to merge-ready and stops there. It doesn't merge unless the user asks to merge, land, or ship.
  • "land the stack" runs Shipping.
  • "take over this branch" runs Session pickup.
  • "pause safely" runs Pause safely.
  • "full autopilot on this queue" runs Autopilot-full. "stack them, don't ship" runs Autopilot-stack. Read the selected playbook's merge rules before explaining what runs unattended.
  • "run the eval playbook" runs Eval.

Without /poteto-mode, a phrase such as "babysit this pr" can start pstack's standalone /babysit skill instead. The Playbooks section lists every playbook and when it applies. Read Babysit or Shipping for the port's PR workflow.

pstack has no planning skill. Claude Code's plan mode works alongside it. For work that spans phases or stacked PRs, asking /poteto-mode for a plan runs the Multi-phase plan playbook, which writes the plan and doesn't implement it. For a design question, the Prototype playbook or /architect settles it in code first.

Principles are one-rule skills that /poteto-mode reads and cites in its replies. The user rarely invokes one. They steer with the names instead, as in "apply prove it works. show me the real output." On Claude Code the principle-* leaves are hidden from the slash menu and /poteto-mode reads them by path; other runtimes may list them in their skill picker. The Principles index lists them.

Fix a run that went wrong

SymptomFix
The mode stopped applying after a few turnsCheck the current runtime's routing configuration through the sources under Get set up. Without automatic routing, invoke poteto-mode for each task.
A question got treated as the next step of the last taskSay "new task", or say the turn doesn't need the mode.
A new model choice had no effectRead setup-pstack and the current runtime's mapping, then check its sheet location and loading method.
Runs cost more than expectedSee the cost paragraph under Get set up.
A skill didn't load on its ownRead its description and the current runtime's skill-loading instructions. Invoke it explicitly when needed; /poteto-mode doesn't run every skill.
Parallel agents overwrote each otherGive each agent its own worktree.
An overnight run moved but finished nothingRead Autonomous run and the current runtime's wake mechanism. For a queue, read the selected Autopilot playbook above. Give the run a check that can pass or fail.
The reply claims success from a green buildAsk for the real command, flow, stored value, or profile. That's the prove-it-works principle.

For a run that drifts, references/prompting.md has one-line steers, and references/recipes.md has prompts to adapt.

Make pstack my own

  • /automate-me drafts a personal mode skill from the user's own history, to use alongside /poteto-mode.
  • /reflect after a session turns its lessons into skill edits the user approves.
  • /poteto-mode write a skill for <workflow> runs the authoring playbook. The eval playbook tests a skill change blind.
  • Fix a misbehaving skill in its own PR, not inside the feature work where it went wrong.

Reply

Lead with the answer. Give at most one example prompt in a code block, adapted from references/recipes.md when one fits, then the link to that file. Keep it short unless the user asked for the whole map.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

architect

免费

Plan types, function inputs and outputs, and module boundaries before implementation. Compare structurally different designs from multiple AI models, document the chosen approach, and guide coding while tracking changes to the agreed design.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Designing a complex feature before coding
  • Comparing alternative module structures
  • Keeping implementation aligned with design decisions
michael-denyer/pstack-claude33702026年10月23日 更新

arena

免费

Generate several candidate solutions in parallel, compare them against concrete criteria, and choose a base. Combine useful parts from other candidates, then verify the final artifact and document why each major choice was made.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Compare multiple designs before choosing a direction
  • Explore different implementations of the same task
  • Combine useful elements from competing drafts
michael-denyer/pstack-claude33702026年10月23日 更新

Turn recurring work habits and communication preferences into a personal agent skill. It combines evidence from workspace conversations with direct questions, then drafts or updates instructions for how agents should work with you.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Capture preferred response length and tone
  • Document testing and review expectations
  • Update personal instructions as work habits change
michael-denyer/pstack-claude33702026年10月23日 更新

babysit

免费

Monitor an open pull request, fix failing automated checks and merge conflicts, and address straightforward review feedback. Recheck after updates, report the resulting status, and hand decisions requiring design judgment back to the user.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Following up on an open PR without repeated prompts
  • Fixing failed automated checks and rechecking results
  • Addressing straightforward review comments
michael-denyer/pstack-claude33702026年10月23日 更新

Checks whether performance measurements support a speedup, slowdown, or technology choice. It examines bottlenecks, production settings, errors, repeatability, and completed work, then guides reporting with run counts, ranges, and a clear verdict.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking before-and-after performance claims in a PR
  • Comparing libraries or configurations fairly
  • Investigating suspicious benchmark results
michael-denyer/pstack-claude33702026年10月23日 更新

Investigate what a code change could break beyond the edited files. Trace downstream effects, identify the key assumption behind its safety, and test that assumption with real code while clearly reporting unresolved risks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking the wider impact of a small code change
  • Verifying assumptions about existing code before design
  • Testing the safety assumption before merging a change
michael-denyer/pstack-claude33702026年10月23日 更新

查看 michael-denyer 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题