brief
免费Write a product brief and its task list when the user requests a product specification. Never implement it.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user invokes Arsenal, needs help choosing an approach, or wants an end-to-end task handled with the installed Arsenal skills.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
One entry point, the shortest sufficient workflow. Read and apply selected skills; do not reproduce their procedures here. Work solo by default.
Load steps/step-00-init.md. Keep the objective, scope, constraints, decisions, artifact paths, permissions and remaining questions in conversation. Reuse existing artifacts; no mandatory orchestration file or roadmap.
With no description, ask what outcome the user wants and whether they want advice, a document, or implementation. Use the runtime's native question form when available and permitted in the active mode; otherwise ask in plain text. Wait for the answer: a preselected option is not submitted consent.
With a description, inspect supplied context and relevant project instructions first. Ask only missing questions that could change the route, scope or safety. Use small adaptive batches, not a fixed questionnaire or complexity score. Existing answers and accepted artifacts are not another interview.
Use the live installed skill inventory, including actual names and paths. These routes express intent, not a required sequence or proof of installation:
| Evidence or requested outcome | Next step |
|---|---|
| Product outcome, audience or scope needs a durable specification | brief |
| Consequential technical choice remains unresolved | propose |
| Clear implementation request or approved implementation artifact | ship |
| External facts are needed to answer the current question | websearch |
| Save, update, read or resume a specific GitHub issue | issue |
| Start a session, resume what was left, discover unfinished work | next |
| End a session and keep the thread for the next one | trace |
| Analyze code in depth, find what is wrong or illogical | review |
| Read project activity or explicitly record progress | trace |
| Explicit phased roadmap or genuine multi-workstream sequencing | Roadmap below |
For another installed Arsenal skill, match its declared purpose to the missing result. Do not route back to Arsenal. A bug does not imply a GitHub issue; a large change does not imply a brief. A short clarification can resolve uncertainty without creating a document. For advice-only requests, recommend the shortest path and stop before execution.
Before routing to ship in a Git repository, check whether another spec is
already running there: a checkout under .worktrees/, or an unfinished
trace.md beside a different spec. If there is one, say so in one line and
ask whether to run this spec with -w, in its own worktree and its own
session. Follow the answer; never pick -w on your own, and never propose
it when nothing else is running.
websearch skill and run one search without handing control over.Missing or unreadable skill: state the gap. Do not claim to have used it or silently install it. Offer installation or a clearly labeled native fallback; stop if the missing capability is essential. No whole-config scan by default.
Standalone stop rules end that skill's step, not an already authorized broader Arsenal task. They never waive approval gates: a proposal remains Draft/Review until explicitly accepted; ship requires a ready brief or Accepted proposal when consuming one. Analysis is not permission to implement. Issue creation, closure, commits, pushes, installs and delegation retain their approval rules. If a selected skill explicitly forbids the required transition, stop and ask.
Stop when the outcome is delivered, approval is needed, the user stops, or a step cannot progress. No repeated unchanged route, redoing completed work, automatic reviewers, model retuning or ceremonial launch confirmations.
Before stating an external fact (a version, an API, a price, a date, a
regulation, the behaviour of a tool or library, a person or company), search
first when the runtime offers web search: read the websearch skill and run
one quick search, then cite the source. One search per fact; --deep only on
request. Without web search, mark the claim unverified. Facts visible in the
repository or the request need no search.
With Espresso or another efficiency plugin, Arsenal still owns routing and the selected skill retains its approval gates, specialized agents, model assignments, schemas, artifacts and verification. An automatic delegation setting does not waive these rules or authorize a competing team/reviewer. Use the stricter applicable scope and concurrency limit. No plugin is required; without one, the workflow is unchanged. Never install one as a routing side effect.
For a requested roadmap or -r <slug>, read the existing roadmap if present
and steps/step-03-plan.md. Preserve its schema and finished phases. Research
only unresolved external questions through websearch when available.
Render scripts/render.py only for --html or an explicit request. Mark ready
when approved; a roadmap request alone does not authorize implementation.
-a permits explicit assumptions, not new permissions; --no-agents stays solo.
Any delegation requires consent, references/agent-contracts.md and the matching
adapter; at most three independent read-only units, no nested delegation.
Explicit --install-omp-agents, --install-codex-agents and matching
--uninstall-* actions use scripts/install_agents.py with backups, then stop.
Never install agents as a side effect of routing.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Write a product brief and its task list when the user requests a product specification. Never implement it.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Create, update or resume a GitHub or Linear issue as durable resolution memory when requested.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Start a session from what was left - trace saves, briefs, proposals, review reports, issues - and ask what to continue. Never resume or implement automatically.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design a concrete technical proposal with evidence and tradeoffs when a decision needs design. No implementation or automatic reviewer.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Deep code review driven by a short interview. Read-only reader agents analyze the chosen scope per angle, the lead verifies every finding, and each point is routed to the skill that fixes it. Never edits the code.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Implement a clear request or an approved brief/proposal. Work solo, make the smallest sufficient change, verify the changed behavior, and stop. Ask before any delegation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。