跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

accessible-travel-planner

Plan a trip that actually works with a disability or access need — confirm real accessibility (not just 'accessible' labels), book the assistance in advance, plan for equipment and medication, and build in the contingencies for when access breaks down. Use when someone says 'plan an accessible trip', 'travelling with a wheelchair/disability', 'book assistance for my flight', or 'will this hotel actually work for me'. Produces an access-verified itinerary, an assistance-booking checklist, an equipment/medication plan, and contingency scripts. Verify specifics with providers.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md6.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Accessible Travel Planner Skill

Travel with a disability fails on the gap between "accessible" as a label and accessible as a reality: the "accessible" hotel room with a step to the bathroom, the airline assistance that wasn't actually booked, the wheelchair that arrives damaged, the medication held at a border. The disabled travelers who have good trips plan differently — they verify access against their specific needs rather than trusting the word, book assistance well ahead and get it in writing, and pre-plan for the predictable failures. This skill runs that planning. It can't guarantee a provider's access, so it verifies specifics with the source and builds the contingencies for when things go wrong anyway.

What This Skill Produces

  • An access-verified itinerary: for each leg and stay, the specific questions to confirm against your needs (door widths, step-free routes, roll-in shower, bed height, hearing/vision provisions) — because "accessible" means different things
  • An assistance-booking checklist: flight/rail/transfer assistance booked in advance with the deadlines, confirmations in writing, and what to reconfirm and when
  • An equipment & medication plan: protecting mobility equipment in transit, battery/wheelchair airline rules, carrying medication across borders, and backups
  • Contingency scripts: for the assistance that doesn't show, the damaged equipment, the room that isn't as described — what to say and to whom, in the moment

Required Inputs

Ask for (if not already provided):

  • The trip (where, when, how — flying/rail/road) and the specific access needs (mobility aid used, transfer ability, sensory needs, medical equipment, fatigue/ pacing, service animal)
  • The bookings made or being considered (airline, hotels, transfers) so they can be access-checked
  • Equipment and medication involved, and any documentation the user has (medical letters, equipment specs)
  • Risk tolerance and support: solo or with a companion, and how much buffer they want

Framework

  1. Verify access against YOUR needs, not the label. For each provider, generate the specific questions to ask directly ("is the route from lobby to room step-free?", "exact bathroom door width?", "is it a roll-in shower or a tub?", "bed height?") and get answers in writing. A photo request beats a promise. "Accessible" unconfirmed is a coin flip.
  2. Book assistance early and in writing. Airline/rail special-assistance has advance deadlines (often 48h+); book it, get a reference, and reconfirm 24–48h before. Transfers and equipment (aisle chairs, hoists) are separate bookings. The written confirmation is what you hold up when it's not on the system.
  3. Protect equipment and medication. Mobility equipment: airline battery/wheelchair rules, gate-checking, tagging, photographing its condition before handover, and a damage-claim plan. Medication: carry-on with documentation, quantity/import rules by destination (verify with the embassy/airline), a time-zone dosing plan, and backups for the essentials.
  4. Plan the fatigue and the pacing. Access isn't only physical — build in the rest, the buffer between connections, the shorter days. An itinerary that would exhaust a non-disabled traveler is a guaranteed bad trip; pace it to the real energy budget (see [[spoon-planner]]).
  5. Pre-write the contingencies. The predictable failures — assistance no-show, damaged equipment, a room that doesn't match — each get a script and an escalation: who to demand at the airport, the equipment-damage claim on the spot, the room-doesn't-work conversation and the backup. Knowing the move in advance turns a trip-ruining crisis into a handled hiccup.

Output Format

## Access-verify these (get answers in writing/photos)
| Leg / stay | The specific questions for YOUR needs |

## Assistance bookings
| Service | Book by | Reference | Reconfirm at |

## Equipment & medication
[Mobility-aid transit protection + damage plan · airline battery/chair rules ·
medication documentation, import rules (verify), dosing across time zones, backups]

## Pacing
[Buffers, rest days, realistic daily load — to your energy budget]

## When it goes wrong (scripts)
[Assistance no-show · damaged equipment (claim on the spot) · room not as described]

⚠ Confirm every access and rule detail with the specific provider/airline/authority —
this plans and prompts, it can't certify a venue's access.

Quality Checks

  • Access is verified with specific questions against the user's needs, in writing — never trusting the "accessible" label
  • Assistance bookings have advance deadlines, references, and a reconfirm step
  • Equipment protection (with a damage plan) and medication/import rules are covered
  • Pacing/fatigue is planned, not just physical access
  • Contingency scripts exist for the predictable failures

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not trust "accessible" without verifying the specifics that matter to this traveler
  • Do not assert airline/border/medication rules as fact — they vary and change; route to the provider/embassy to confirm
  • Do not plan a punishing pace — access includes energy, not just ramps
  • Do not skip the written confirmations — they're the leverage when assistance "isn't on the system"
  • Do not omit the contingencies — the failures are predictable, so the responses should be pre-made

Related

[[spoon-planner]] and [[flare-day-planner]] for the energy/health layer; [[venue-access-check]] for checking a single place; [[relocation-planner]] for moving rather than visiting; [[travel-itinerary|group-trip-negotiator]] for the group version.

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Plan an accessible trip."
  • "Travel with a wheelchair/disability."
  • "Book assistance for my flight."
  • "Will this hotel actually work for me?"

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills14822026年10月23日 更新

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills14822026年10月23日 更新

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills14822026年10月23日 更新

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills14822026年10月23日 更新

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills14822026年10月23日 更新

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills14822026年10月23日 更新

查看 mohitagw15856 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题