跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

car-tco

Compare the total cost of car ownership across buy-new, buy-used, lease, and keep-your-current-car — depreciation, insurance, maintenance ramp, and fuel over a real horizon, not just the monthly payment. Use when asked should I lease or buy a car, is it cheaper to keep my old car, what does this car really cost per month, or new vs used total cost. Produces the ranked scenario totals, per-month true cost, the assumption ledger, and the not-modeled list.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB
  • references/worked-example.md4.1 KB
  • scripts/car_tco.py4.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Car TCO Skill

Cars are sold on monthly payments and owned on total cost — and the two rank options differently. Depreciation (the biggest cost of a new car) never appears on a statement; maintenance (the biggest fear about an old car) is usually smaller than a year of new-car depreciation. This skill compares buy-new, buy-used, lease-forever, and keep-current on the same total-cost basis over the same horizon.

What This Skill Produces

  • Ranked scenario totals — every requested scenario over the same horizon, cheapest first
  • True per-month cost — total ÷ months, the number to compare against the payment the dealer quotes
  • The assumption ledger — depreciation curve, maintenance ramp, insurance deltas, all labeled
  • The not-modeled list — financing interest, jurisdiction taxes, reliability luck

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

  • Which scenarios to compare — any of: new price, used-equivalent price, lease terms, current car's value + annual maintenance
  • Horizon — years they realistically keep cars (default 8, labeled); short horizons flatter leasing, long ones flatter buying
  • Miles per year and rough fuel/energy cost (defaults 12,000 mi / $0.14 per mile, labeled)

Programmatic Helper

python3 scripts/car_tco.py --new-price 38000 --used-price 24000 --lease-month 420 --keep-value 9000
python3 scripts/car_tco.py --new-price 38000 --keep-value 9000 --keep-maint 1800 --horizon 6 --json

Deterministic. Depreciation: 20% year one then 10%/yr for new, gentler for used/current. Maintenance ramps 8%/yr (used cars start further up the ramp). Leases re-lease at each term end with a fresh drive-off. Resale value is credited back — TCO is what you spent minus what you can recover.

Framework: The Payment Illusion Rules

  • Depreciation is the invisible line item — a new car's largest cost has no bill; it's the resale-value credit shrinking
  • "My old car needs $2,000 of work" is usually cheap — compare the repair to a year of the replacement's depreciation before calling it "not worth fixing"
  • Leasing buys flexibility, not savings — lease-forever means paying peak depreciation years forever; price that honestly and let people buy flexibility knowingly
  • Margins under ~10% are noise — the model's assumptions can't resolve differences that small; say "roughly a tie," not a winner
  • The horizon drives the ranking — always name it; the same inputs rank differently at 3 years vs 10

Output Format


Car TCO: [scenarios] over [N] years

The Ranking

[Script output: totals cheapest-first, per-month true cost]

Reading the Ranking

[Two sentences: how far apart the options really are, and which assumption could flip the order.]

What This Model Ignores

Financing interest (run the loan separately) · taxes and fees by jurisdiction · reliability variance (a lemon breaks any model) · the non-financials (safety features, the want).

Educational model, not financial advice — verify with a licensed professional before acting on it.


Quality Checks

  • All scenarios use the same horizon and mileage
  • Resale value is credited back in every ownership scenario
  • Per-month true cost appears next to the totals
  • Sub-10% margins are called ties, not winners
  • The disclaimer line appears in the artifact

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not rank on monthly payment — that's the illusion this skill exists to correct
  • Do not omit depreciation or resale from ownership scenarios
  • Do not treat maintenance fears as data — use the ramp, and compare repairs to replacement depreciation
  • Do not extrapolate one scenario's horizon onto another (a 3-year lease vs 8-year ownership is not a comparison)
  • Do not moralize the want — price the options honestly and let the user choose with open eyes

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Should I lease?"
  • "Buy a car."
  • "Is it cheaper to keep my old car?"
  • "What does this car really cost per month?"

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills14822026年10月23日 更新

Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills14822026年10月23日 更新

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills14822026年10月23日 更新

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills14822026年10月23日 更新

Build or tailor an academic CV for faculty, postdoc, research or fellowship applications: publications, grants, teaching, supervision and service in the order the field expects, with consistent citations. Use when asked to write my academic CV, update my CV for a lectureship, tenure-track or postdoc application, format my publications list, or adapt my academic CV for an industry research role. Produces the full academic CV, a field-appropriate section order, a clean publications list in one citation style, and a two-page summary version when asked.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills14822026年10月23日 更新

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills14822026年10月23日 更新

查看 mohitagw15856 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题