Audit a bounded mathematical slice for missing or unusable Jacobian capabilities, beyond a single-operation review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review mathematical agent trajectories for evidence-backed Jacobian improvements; do not resume solving.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Extract reusable Jacobian lessons from a completed or paused investigation; do not resume solving the problem. A correct answer can expose workflow defects, and an unsuccessful search can reveal useful mathematical vocabulary.
Record the intended and actual outcome, stopping condition, transcript coverage, and available revision/catalog context. Use observable sources, calls, code, artifacts, corrections, and final claims. Narration alone is not execution evidence; current-main capabilities were not necessarily available in the trace.
Reconstruct decisions that changed correctness, cost, progress, or confidence. For a finding that depends on mathematical claims, numerical or symbolic work, solver semantics, or bespoke code, consult mathematical evidence. Preserve decisive claims and later corrections, with their hypotheses and evidence scope.
Distinguish working capabilities, environment limitations, discovery/selection, execution friction, representation/interoperability, contract/scale defects, missing operations, handoff failures, and caller reasoning. Compare needed postconditions with the session-visible catalog when available; check current source before proposing new work. Handwritten code and tool non-use are leads, not automatic evidence of missing operations.
Separate a reusable operation gap from public-catalog admission. An existing postcondition with a narrow envelope is a scale/backend question. A convenience or theorem-specific assembly does not become a public operation solely because it occurred in the trace. Use the admission contract when proposing publication.
Route only when the requested follow-up needs a deeper workflow:
evaluate-mcp-tool-adoption for controlled availability, discovery, or selection;audit-mcp-tool-friction for problems after selecting a tool;audit-public-operation-contracts for a particular mathematical contract; orrecent-conjecture-evaluations for a new held-out reliability probe.An unresolved conjecture is generally unsuitable as an evaluation oracle. Extract frozen, independently checkable finite obligations when proposing an evaluation, and preserve contamination boundaries.
For each material finding, give the source evidence, implication, proportionate repair, and uncertainty. Include a compact claim/correction ledger when it helps explain a changed conclusion; include ownership and success criteria when proposing implementation. Search narrowly for an existing issue before suggesting a new one. External mutations require user authorization.
Prefer discovery, contract, representation, or scale repairs when they explain the failure. Update skills only for reusable decision guidance and product docs only for durable public behavior. An isolated agent slip may need no repository change. Stop when the requested trace is accounted for and the supported lessons and remaining proof gaps are clear; report coverage rather than implying that the underlying mathematical problem is solved.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Audit a bounded mathematical slice for missing or unusable Jacobian capabilities, beyond a single-operation review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Diagnose malformed calls, retries, and unusable results after an agent selects an MCP tool.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design or audit a Jacobian operation’s mathematical contract, boundedness, exact results, and composition.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Extract reusable Jacobian capabilities from a mathematical solution corpus, rather than one agent trajectory.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Investigate MCP tool availability, discovery, and selection, including controlled adoption evaluations.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Author, package, validate, or run mathematical evaluations as Jacobian Harbor datasets.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。