跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

analyzing-docker-container-forensics

Investigate compromised Docker containers by preserving evidence and examining image layers, logs, file changes, and host settings. Summarize suspicious activity, security configuration issues, and vulnerability findings to support incident response.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Investigate compromised Docker containers by analyzing images, layers, volumes, logs, and runtime artifacts to identify malicious activity and evidence.

集成工具Docker
查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Investigating a compromised application container
  • Examining a suspicious image from a registry
  • Checking evidence of a container escape attempt
  • Investigating unauthorized cryptocurrency mining

包含的文件(4)

  • SKILL.md12.6 KB
  • LICENSE11.0 KB
  • references/api-reference.md2.8 KB
  • scripts/agent.py8.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Analyzing Docker Container Forensics

When to Use

  • When investigating a compromised Docker container or container host
  • For analyzing malicious Docker images pulled from registries
  • During incident response involving containerized application breaches
  • When examining container escape attempts or privilege escalation
  • For auditing container configurations and identifying misconfigurations

Prerequisites

  • Docker CLI access on the forensic workstation
  • Access to the Docker host file system (forensic image or live)
  • Understanding of Docker layered file system (overlay2, aufs)
  • dive, docker-explorer, or container-diff for image analysis
  • Knowledge of Docker daemon configuration and socket security
  • Trivy or Grype for vulnerability scanning of container images

Workflow

Step 1: Preserve Container State and Evidence

# List all containers (including stopped)
docker ps -a --no-trunc > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_list.txt

# Inspect the compromised container
CONTAINER_ID="abc123def456"
docker inspect $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_inspect.json

# Export container filesystem as tarball (preserves current state)
docker export $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_export.tar

# Create an image from the container's current state
docker commit $CONTAINER_ID forensic-evidence:case-2024-001
docker save forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_image.tar

# Capture container logs
docker logs $CONTAINER_ID --timestamps > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_logs.txt 2>&1

# Capture running processes (if container is still running)
docker top $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_processes.txt

# Capture network connections
docker exec $CONTAINER_ID netstat -tlnp 2>/dev/null > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_network.txt

# Copy specific files from the container
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/var/log/ /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_var_log/
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/tmp/ /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_tmp/
docker cp $CONTAINER_ID:/etc/passwd /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_passwd

# Hash all exported evidence
sha256sum /cases/case-2024-001/docker/*.tar > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/evidence_hashes.txt

Step 2: Analyze Container Image Layers

# Install dive for image layer analysis
wget https://github.com/wagoodman/dive/releases/latest/download/dive_linux_amd64.deb
sudo dpkg -i dive_linux_amd64.deb

# Analyze image layers interactively
dive forensic-evidence:case-2024-001

# Non-interactive layer analysis
dive forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 --ci --json /cases/case-2024-001/docker/dive_analysis.json

# Extract and examine individual layers
mkdir -p /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/
tar -xf /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_image.tar -C /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/

# List the image manifest and layer order
cat /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/manifest.json | python3 -m json.tool

# Examine each layer for changes
for layer in /cases/case-2024-001/docker/layers/*/layer.tar; do
    echo "=== Layer: $(dirname $layer | xargs basename) ==="
    tar -tf "$layer" | head -20
    echo "..."
done

# Use container-diff to compare with original base image
# Install container-diff
curl -LO https://storage.googleapis.com/container-diff/latest/container-diff-linux-amd64
chmod +x container-diff-linux-amd64

# Compare committed image with original
./container-diff-linux-amd64 diff daemon://nginx:latest daemon://forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
   --type=file --type=apt --type=history --json \
   > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_diff.json

Step 3: Examine Docker Host Artifacts

# Docker data directory (default: /var/lib/docker/)
DOCKER_ROOT="/mnt/evidence/var/lib/docker"

# Examine overlay2 filesystem layers
ls -la $DOCKER_ROOT/overlay2/

# Find the container's merged filesystem
CONTAINER_HASH=$(docker inspect $CONTAINER_ID --format '{{.GraphDriver.Data.MergedDir}}' 2>/dev/null)
# Or manually from forensic image:
# Look in /var/lib/docker/containers/<container_id>/config.v2.json

# Analyze container configuration files
cat $DOCKER_ROOT/containers/$CONTAINER_ID/config.v2.json | python3 -m json.tool \
   > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_config.json

# Check Docker daemon configuration
cat /mnt/evidence/etc/docker/daemon.json 2>/dev/null > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/daemon_config.json

# Examine Docker events log
cat $DOCKER_ROOT/containers/$CONTAINER_ID/*.log > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_json_logs.txt

# Check for volume mounts (potential host filesystem access)
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json

with open('/cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_inspect.json') as f:
    data = json.load(f)

inspect = data[0] if isinstance(data, list) else data

print("=== CONTAINER SECURITY ANALYSIS ===\n")

# Check mounts
print("Volume Mounts:")
for mount in inspect.get('Mounts', []):
    rw = "READ-WRITE" if mount.get('RW') else "READ-ONLY"
    print(f"  {mount.get('Source', 'N/A')} -> {mount.get('Destination', 'N/A')} ({rw})")
    if mount.get('Source') in ('/', '/etc', '/var', '/root') and mount.get('RW'):
        print(f"    WARNING: Sensitive host path mounted read-write!")

# Check privileged mode
host_config = inspect.get('HostConfig', {})
if host_config.get('Privileged'):
    print("\nWARNING: Container was running in PRIVILEGED mode!")

# Check capabilities
cap_add = host_config.get('CapAdd', [])
if cap_add:
    print(f"\nAdded Capabilities: {cap_add}")
    dangerous_caps = ['SYS_ADMIN', 'SYS_PTRACE', 'NET_ADMIN', 'SYS_MODULE']
    for cap in cap_add:
        if cap in dangerous_caps:
            print(f"  WARNING: Dangerous capability: {cap}")

# Check PID namespace
if host_config.get('PidMode') == 'host':
    print("\nWARNING: Container shares host PID namespace!")

# Check network mode
if host_config.get('NetworkMode') == 'host':
    print("\nWARNING: Container shares host network namespace!")

# Check user
user = inspect.get('Config', {}).get('User', 'root (default)')
print(f"\nRunning as user: {user}")

# Check environment variables for secrets
env_vars = inspect.get('Config', {}).get('Env', [])
print(f"\nEnvironment Variables: {len(env_vars)}")
for env in env_vars:
    key = env.split('=')[0]
    if any(s in key.upper() for s in ['PASSWORD', 'SECRET', 'KEY', 'TOKEN', 'CREDENTIAL']):
        print(f"  SENSITIVE: {key}=***REDACTED***")
PYEOF

Step 4: Analyze Container File System Changes

# Compare container filesystem to original image
docker diff $CONTAINER_ID > /cases/case-2024-001/docker/filesystem_changes.txt

# A = Added, C = Changed, D = Deleted
# Analyze changes
python3 << 'PYEOF'
added = []
changed = []
deleted = []

with open('/cases/case-2024-001/docker/filesystem_changes.txt') as f:
    for line in f:
        line = line.strip()
        if line.startswith('A '):
            added.append(line[2:])
        elif line.startswith('C '):
            changed.append(line[2:])
        elif line.startswith('D '):
            deleted.append(line[2:])

print(f"Files Added: {len(added)}")
print(f"Files Changed: {len(changed)}")
print(f"Files Deleted: {len(deleted)}")

# Flag suspicious additions
suspicious = [f for f in added if any(s in f for s in
    ['/tmp/', '/dev/shm/', '/root/', '.sh', '.py', '.elf', 'reverse', 'shell', 'backdoor'])]
if suspicious:
    print(f"\nSuspicious Added Files:")
    for f in suspicious:
        print(f"  {f}")

# Flag suspicious changes
sus_changed = [f for f in changed if any(s in f for s in
    ['/etc/passwd', '/etc/shadow', '/etc/crontab', '/etc/ssh', '.bashrc'])]
if sus_changed:
    print(f"\nSuspicious Changed Files:")
    for f in sus_changed:
        print(f"  {f}")
PYEOF

# Extract and examine the container export
mkdir -p /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/
tar -xf /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_export.tar -C /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/

# Scan for webshells and malicious files
find /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/tmp/ -type f -exec file {} \;
find /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/ -name "*.php" -newer /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/etc/hostname

Step 5: Scan for Vulnerabilities and Generate Report

# Scan the image for known vulnerabilities
trivy image forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
   --format json \
   --output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/vulnerability_scan.json

# Scan the exported filesystem
trivy fs /cases/case-2024-001/docker/container_fs/ \
   --format table \
   --output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/fs_vulnerabilities.txt

# Check for secrets in the image
trivy image forensic-evidence:case-2024-001 \
   --scanners secret \
   --format json \
   --output /cases/case-2024-001/docker/secrets_scan.json

Key Concepts

ConceptDescription
Image layersRead-only filesystem layers stacked to form the container image
overlay2Default Docker storage driver using union filesystem for layers
Container diffComparison of runtime filesystem changes against the original image
Privileged modeContainer with full host capabilities (bypasses most isolation)
Docker socketUnix socket (/var/run/docker.sock) controlling the Docker daemon
Container escapeTechnique for breaking out of container isolation to the host
Volume mountsHost filesystem paths made accessible inside the container
Image historyRecord of Dockerfile instructions used to build each layer

Tools & Systems

ToolPurpose
docker inspectDetailed container configuration and state information
docker diffShow filesystem changes made in a running/stopped container
diveInteractive Docker image layer analysis tool
container-diffGoogle tool for comparing container image contents
TrivyVulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems
docker-explorerForensic tool for offline Docker artifact analysis
SysdigContainer runtime security monitoring and forensics
FalcoRuntime threat detection for containers and Kubernetes

Common Scenarios

Scenario 1: Web Application Container Compromise Export the container filesystem, identify webshells in web root, analyze access logs for exploitation attempts, check for added files and modified configurations, examine network connections for C2 communication, review container capabilities for escalation paths.

Scenario 2: Supply Chain Attack via Malicious Image Analyze image layers with dive to identify which layer added malicious content, compare with the official base image using container-diff, check image history for suspicious RUN commands, scan for embedded backdoors and cryptocurrency miners, trace the image pull from registry logs.

Scenario 3: Container Escape Investigation Check if container ran privileged or with dangerous capabilities, examine host filesystem mount points for unauthorized access, review Docker socket mount enabling Docker-in-Docker abuse, analyze host system logs for container escape indicators, check for kernel exploit artifacts.

Scenario 4: Cryptojacking in Container Environment Identify high-CPU containers, export and analyze the container image for mining binaries, check for unauthorized images in the registry, review container creation events for rogue deployments, examine network connections for mining pool communications.

Output Format

Docker Container Forensics Summary:
  Container: abc123def456 (nginx-app)
  Image: company/web-app:v2.1
  Status: Running (started 2024-01-10 09:00 UTC)
  Host: docker-host-01.corp.local

  Security Configuration:
    Privileged: No
    Capabilities Added: NET_ADMIN (WARNING)
    Volume Mounts: /var/log -> /host-logs (RW)
    Network Mode: bridge
    User: root (WARNING)

  Filesystem Changes:
    Added: 23 files (5 suspicious)
    Changed: 12 files (2 suspicious)
    Deleted: 0 files

  Suspicious Findings:
    /tmp/reverse.sh - Reverse shell script (Added)
    /var/www/html/.hidden/shell.php - PHP webshell (Added)
    /etc/crontab - Modified (persistence cron entry added)
    /root/.ssh/authorized_keys - Modified (unauthorized key added)

  Vulnerability Scan:
    Critical: 3 (CVE-2024-xxxx in base image)
    High: 12
    Medium: 34

  Evidence: /cases/case-2024-001/docker/

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Assess exposure of Windows secrets protected by DPAPI, the operating system’s data protection service, during authorized security tests. Guide examination and decryption of saved credentials and browser data using available user sessions, credentials, or backup keys.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing saved credential exposure in authorized tests
  • Examining collected DPAPI files offline
  • Reviewing protected browser and RDP credentials
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Assess Shadow Credentials account takeover during authorized Active Directory testing. Examine permissions that allow public key registration, validate authentication without a password reset, and document credential cleanup, detection opportunities, and access control changes needed for remediation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing risky permissions identified in BloodHound
  • Validating account takeover without resetting a password
  • Generating directory change records during security exercises
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Prepare for CMMC Level 2, a cybersecurity certification for defense contractors. Define the systems handling controlled information, review security requirements, calculate the SPRS assessment score, and organize remediation plans and evidence into a readiness report.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Define the assessment scope for systems handling controlled information
  • Calculate an SPRS score and prioritize unmet security requirements
  • Prepare security plans, remediation milestones, and assessment evidence
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Create disk images for investigations using dd or dcfldd on Linux. The workflow covers write protection, bit-for-bit copying, hash checks to verify integrity, and documentation of the acquisition process.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preserving a suspect drive before investigation
  • Creating evidence copies of USB devices or memory cards
  • Verifying that a disk image matches its source
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Review Active Directory permissions with ldap3, a Python library for directory queries. Identify excessive access granted to non-administrative accounts, explain potential privilege escalation paths, and produce a JSON report with affected objects and remediation recommendations.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Auditing excessive Active Directory permissions
  • Investigating privilege escalation paths from ordinary accounts
  • Reporting affected objects and permission remediation recommendations
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Inspect suspicious Android APK files without running them. Analyze permissions, app components, suspicious code patterns, and network indicators, then produce a JSON risk report to support malware triage and detection rule development.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Triage suspicious APK files without running them
  • Inspect dangerous permission combinations and suspicious API calls
  • Extract network indicators for malware detection rules
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

查看 mukul975 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题