跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

analyzing-prefetch-files-for-execution-history

Parse Windows Prefetch files, which store traces of program execution, to extract run counts, timestamps, and referenced files. Build execution timelines and compare findings with other forensic evidence when investigating suspicious software or tool usage.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Parse Windows Prefetch files (versions 17, 23, 26, 30) with tools like PECmd, WinPrefetchView, or python-prefetch to determine program execution history, including run counts, execution timestamps, and referenced files/DLLs. Use when building a timeline of program execution on a Windows system, confirming whether a suspicious binary ran, or correlating execution evidence with other forensic artifacts during an investigation.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Checking whether a suspicious program ran
  • Building a timeline of investigative tool findings
  • Investigating compression and file transfer tool usage
  • Checking for traces of evidence-cleaning tools

包含的文件(4)

  • SKILL.md11.9 KB
  • LICENSE11.0 KB
  • references/api-reference.md3.1 KB
  • scripts/agent.py8.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Analyzing Prefetch Files for Execution History

When to Use

  • When determining which programs were executed on a Windows system and when
  • During malware investigations to confirm execution of suspicious binaries
  • For establishing a timeline of application usage during an incident
  • When correlating program execution with other forensic artifacts
  • To identify anti-forensic tools or unauthorized software that was run

Prerequisites

  • Access to Windows Prefetch directory (C:\Windows\Prefetch) from forensic image
  • PECmd (Eric Zimmerman), WinPrefetchView, or python-prefetch parser
  • Understanding of Prefetch file format (versions 17, 23, 26, 30)
  • Windows system with Prefetch enabled (default on client OS, disabled on servers)
  • Knowledge of Prefetch naming conventions (APPNAME-HASH.pf)

Workflow

Step 1: Extract Prefetch Files from Forensic Image

# Mount the forensic image
mount -o ro,loop,offset=$((2048*512)) /cases/case-2024-001/images/evidence.dd /mnt/evidence

# Copy all prefetch files
mkdir -p /cases/case-2024-001/prefetch/
cp /mnt/evidence/Windows/Prefetch/*.pf /cases/case-2024-001/prefetch/

# Count and list prefetch files
ls -la /cases/case-2024-001/prefetch/ | wc -l
ls -la /cases/case-2024-001/prefetch/ | head -30

# Hash all prefetch files for integrity
sha256sum /cases/case-2024-001/prefetch/*.pf > /cases/case-2024-001/prefetch/pf_hashes.txt

# Note: Prefetch filename format is EXECUTABLE_NAME-XXXXXXXX.pf
# The hash (XXXXXXXX) is based on the executable path
# Same executable from different paths creates different prefetch files

Step 2: Parse Prefetch Files with PECmd

# Using Eric Zimmerman's PECmd (Windows or via Mono/Wine on Linux)
# Download from https://ericzimmerman.github.io/

# Parse a single prefetch file
PECmd.exe -f "C:\cases\prefetch\POWERSHELL.EXE-A]B2C3D4.pf"

# Parse all prefetch files and output to CSV
PECmd.exe -d "C:\cases\prefetch\" --csv "C:\cases\analysis\" --csvf prefetch_results.csv

# Parse with JSON output
PECmd.exe -d "C:\cases\prefetch\" --json "C:\cases\analysis\" --jsonf prefetch_results.json

# Output includes for each file:
# - Executable name and path
# - Run count
# - Last run time (up to 8 timestamps in Windows 10)
# - Files and directories referenced during execution
# - Volume information (serial number, creation date)
# - Prefetch file creation time

Step 3: Parse with Python for Linux-Based Analysis

pip install prefetch

python3 << 'PYEOF'
import os
import json
from datetime import datetime

# Parse prefetch files using python
import struct

def parse_prefetch(filepath):
    """Parse a Windows Prefetch file."""
    with open(filepath, 'rb') as f:
        data = f.read()

    # Check for MAM compressed format (Windows 10)
    if data[:4] == b'MAM\x04':
        import lznt1  # or use DecompressBuffer
        # Windows 10 prefetch files are compressed
        print(f"  [Compressed Win10 format - use PECmd for full parsing]")
        return None

    # Version 17 (XP), 23 (Vista/7), 26 (8.1), 30 (10)
    version = struct.unpack('<I', data[0:4])[0]
    signature = data[4:8]

    if signature != b'SCCA':
        print(f"  Invalid prefetch signature")
        return None

    file_size = struct.unpack('<I', data[8:12])[0]
    exec_name = data[16:76].decode('utf-16-le').strip('\x00')
    run_count = struct.unpack('<I', data[208:212])[0] if version >= 23 else struct.unpack('<I', data[144:148])[0]

    result = {
        'version': version,
        'executable': exec_name,
        'file_size': file_size,
        'run_count': run_count,
    }

    # Extract last execution timestamps
    if version == 23:  # Vista/7 - 1 timestamp
        ts = struct.unpack('<Q', data[128:136])[0]
        result['last_run'] = filetime_to_datetime(ts)
    elif version >= 26:  # Win8+ - up to 8 timestamps
        timestamps = []
        for i in range(8):
            ts = struct.unpack('<Q', data[128+i*8:136+i*8])[0]
            if ts > 0:
                timestamps.append(filetime_to_datetime(ts))
        result['last_run_times'] = timestamps

    return result

def filetime_to_datetime(ft):
    """Convert Windows FILETIME to datetime string."""
    if ft == 0:
        return None
    timestamp = (ft - 116444736000000000) / 10000000
    try:
        return datetime.utcfromtimestamp(timestamp).strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S UTC')
    except (OSError, ValueError):
        return None

# Process all prefetch files
prefetch_dir = '/cases/case-2024-001/prefetch/'
results = []

for filename in sorted(os.listdir(prefetch_dir)):
    if filename.lower().endswith('.pf'):
        filepath = os.path.join(prefetch_dir, filename)
        print(f"\n=== {filename} ===")
        result = parse_prefetch(filepath)
        if result:
            print(f"  Executable: {result['executable']}")
            print(f"  Run Count:  {result['run_count']}")
            if 'last_run' in result:
                print(f"  Last Run:   {result['last_run']}")
            elif 'last_run_times' in result:
                for i, ts in enumerate(result['last_run_times']):
                    print(f"  Run Time {i+1}: {ts}")
            results.append(result)

# Save results
with open('/cases/case-2024-001/analysis/prefetch_analysis.json', 'w') as f:
    json.dump(results, f, indent=2)
PYEOF

Step 4: Identify Suspicious Execution Evidence

# Search for known malicious tool names in prefetch
ls /cases/case-2024-001/prefetch/ | grep -iE \
   '(MIMIKATZ|PSEXEC|WMIC|COBALT|BEACON|PWDUMP|PROCDUMP|LAZAGNE|RUBEUS|BLOODHOUND|SHARPHOUND|CERTUTIL|BITSADMIN)'

# Search for script interpreters (potential malicious execution)
ls /cases/case-2024-001/prefetch/ | grep -iE \
   '(POWERSHELL|CMD\.EXE|WSCRIPT|CSCRIPT|MSHTA|REGSVR32|RUNDLL32|MSIEXEC)'

# Search for remote access tools
ls /cases/case-2024-001/prefetch/ | grep -iE \
   '(TEAMVIEWER|ANYDESK|LOGMEIN|VNC|SPLASHTOP|SCREENCONNECT|AMMYY)'

# Search for data exfiltration tools
ls /cases/case-2024-001/prefetch/ | grep -iE \
   '(RAR|7Z|ZIP|RCLONE|MEGA|DROPBOX|ONEDRIVE|GDRIVE|FTP|CURL|WGET)'

# Find recently created prefetch files (newest executables run)
ls -lt /cases/case-2024-001/prefetch/ | head -20

# Cross-reference with Shimcache and Amcache for confirmation
# Prefetch existence = program was executed at least once

Step 5: Build Execution Timeline

# Create timeline from prefetch data
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json
import csv

with open('/cases/case-2024-001/analysis/prefetch_analysis.json') as f:
    data = json.load(f)

timeline = []
for entry in data:
    if 'last_run_times' in entry:
        for ts in entry['last_run_times']:
            if ts:
                timeline.append({
                    'timestamp': ts,
                    'executable': entry['executable'],
                    'run_count': entry['run_count'],
                    'source': 'Prefetch'
                })
    elif 'last_run' in entry and entry['last_run']:
        timeline.append({
            'timestamp': entry['last_run'],
            'executable': entry['executable'],
            'run_count': entry['run_count'],
            'source': 'Prefetch'
        })

# Sort chronologically
timeline.sort(key=lambda x: x['timestamp'])

# Write timeline CSV
with open('/cases/case-2024-001/analysis/execution_timeline.csv', 'w', newline='') as f:
    writer = csv.DictWriter(f, fieldnames=['timestamp', 'executable', 'run_count', 'source'])
    writer.writeheader()
    writer.writerows(timeline)

# Print suspicious time window
for entry in timeline:
    if '2024-01-15' in entry['timestamp'] or '2024-01-16' in entry['timestamp']:
        print(f"  {entry['timestamp']} | {entry['executable']} (x{entry['run_count']})")
PYEOF

Key Concepts

ConceptDescription
PrefetchWindows performance optimization that pre-loads application data and tracks execution
SCCA signatureMagic bytes identifying a valid Prefetch file
Path hashCRC-based hash of the executable path forming part of the .pf filename
Run countNumber of times the executable has been launched (may wrap around)
Last run timestampsWindows 8+ stores up to 8 most recent execution timestamps
Referenced filesList of files and directories accessed during the first 10 seconds of execution
Volume informationDrive serial number and creation date identifying the source volume
MAM compressionWindows 10 Prefetch files use MAM4 compression requiring decompression before parsing

Tools & Systems

ToolPurpose
PECmdEric Zimmerman's Prefetch parser with CSV/JSON output
WinPrefetchViewNirSoft GUI tool for viewing Prefetch files
python-prefetchPython library for parsing Prefetch files
Prefetch Hash CalculatorTool to calculate expected hash from executable paths
KAPEAutomated artifact collection including Prefetch
AutopsyForensic platform with Prefetch analysis module
Plaso/log2timelineSuper-timeline tool that includes Prefetch parser
VelociraptorEndpoint agent with Prefetch collection and analysis artifacts

Common Scenarios

Scenario 1: Confirming Malware Execution Search Prefetch directory for the malware executable name, confirm execution via Prefetch existence, extract run count and last run time, identify referenced DLLs to understand malware behavior, correlate with registry autorun entries.

Scenario 2: Attacker Tool Usage Timeline Identify Prefetch files for PsExec, Mimikatz, BloodHound, and other attacker tools, build chronological timeline of tool execution, determine the sequence of the attack (reconnaissance, credential theft, lateral movement), match timestamps with network connection logs.

Scenario 3: Data Staging and Exfiltration Look for Prefetch entries of compression tools (7z, WinRAR, zip), identify execution of file transfer utilities (rclone, FTP clients), check for cloud storage client execution, timeline when data staging and transfer occurred.

Scenario 4: Anti-Forensics Detection Check for execution of known anti-forensic tools (CCleaner, Eraser, SDelete), identify if Prefetch directory was recently cleared (fewer files than expected for active system), note timestamps of anti-forensic tool execution relative to other evidence.

Output Format

Prefetch Analysis Summary:
  System: Windows 10 Pro (Build 19041)
  Prefetch Files: 234
  Analysis Period: All available execution history

  Execution Statistics:
    Total unique executables: 234
    First execution: 2023-06-15 (system install)
    Latest execution: 2024-01-18 23:45 UTC

  Suspicious Executions:
    MIMIKATZ.EXE-5F2A3B1C.pf
      Run Count: 3 | Last: 2024-01-16 02:30:15 UTC
    PSEXEC.EXE-AD70946C.pf
      Run Count: 7 | Last: 2024-01-16 02:45:30 UTC
    RCLONE.EXE-1F3E5A2B.pf
      Run Count: 2 | Last: 2024-01-17 03:15:00 UTC
    POWERSHELL.EXE-022A1004.pf
      Run Count: 145 | Last: 2024-01-18 14:00:00 UTC

  Attack Timeline (from Prefetch):
    2024-01-15 14:32 - POWERSHELL.EXE (initial access)
    2024-01-16 02:30 - MIMIKATZ.EXE (credential theft)
    2024-01-16 02:45 - PSEXEC.EXE (lateral movement)
    2024-01-17 03:15 - RCLONE.EXE (data exfiltration)

  Report: /cases/case-2024-001/analysis/execution_timeline.csv

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Assess exposure of Windows secrets protected by DPAPI, the operating system’s data protection service, during authorized security tests. Guide examination and decryption of saved credentials and browser data using available user sessions, credentials, or backup keys.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing saved credential exposure in authorized tests
  • Examining collected DPAPI files offline
  • Reviewing protected browser and RDP credentials
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Assess Shadow Credentials account takeover during authorized Active Directory testing. Examine permissions that allow public key registration, validate authentication without a password reset, and document credential cleanup, detection opportunities, and access control changes needed for remediation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing risky permissions identified in BloodHound
  • Validating account takeover without resetting a password
  • Generating directory change records during security exercises
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Prepare for CMMC Level 2, a cybersecurity certification for defense contractors. Define the systems handling controlled information, review security requirements, calculate the SPRS assessment score, and organize remediation plans and evidence into a readiness report.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Define the assessment scope for systems handling controlled information
  • Calculate an SPRS score and prioritize unmet security requirements
  • Prepare security plans, remediation milestones, and assessment evidence
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Create disk images for investigations using dd or dcfldd on Linux. The workflow covers write protection, bit-for-bit copying, hash checks to verify integrity, and documentation of the acquisition process.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preserving a suspect drive before investigation
  • Creating evidence copies of USB devices or memory cards
  • Verifying that a disk image matches its source
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Review Active Directory permissions with ldap3, a Python library for directory queries. Identify excessive access granted to non-administrative accounts, explain potential privilege escalation paths, and produce a JSON report with affected objects and remediation recommendations.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Auditing excessive Active Directory permissions
  • Investigating privilege escalation paths from ordinary accounts
  • Reporting affected objects and permission remediation recommendations
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Inspect suspicious Android APK files without running them. Analyze permissions, app components, suspicious code patterns, and network indicators, then produce a JSON risk report to support malware triage and detection rule development.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Triage suspicious APK files without running them
  • Inspect dangerous permission combinations and suspicious API calls
  • Extract network indicators for malware detection rules
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

查看 mukul975 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题