跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

building-patch-tuesday-response-process

Build a repeatable process for Microsoft monthly security updates, from reviewing advisories and ranking vulnerabilities to testing, staged deployment, and verification. Helps teams set response deadlines based on risk and report remaining unpatched systems.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Establish a repeatable operational process for triaging, testing, and deploying Microsoft Patch Tuesday security updates (Windows, Office, Exchange, SQL Server, Azure) via WSUS/SCCM within risk-based remediation SLAs, from advisory review through validation. Use when building or improving a monthly patch management workflow or prioritizing which CVEs to remediate first.

集成工具Azure
查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Establishing a monthly Microsoft security update workflow
  • Prioritizing vulnerabilities by exploitation risk
  • Planning pilot and production deployment stages
  • Reporting patch coverage and unresolved exceptions

包含的文件(8)

  • SKILL.md9.1 KB
  • assets/template.md1.0 KB
  • LICENSE11.0 KB
  • references/api-reference.md1.8 KB
  • references/standards.md1.4 KB
  • references/workflows.md2.8 KB
  • scripts/agent.py6.3 KB
  • scripts/process.py7.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Building Patch Tuesday Response Process

Overview

Microsoft releases security updates on the second Tuesday of each month ("Patch Tuesday"), addressing vulnerabilities across Windows, Office, Exchange, SQL Server, Azure services, and other products. In 2025, Microsoft patched over 1,129 vulnerabilities across the year -- an 11.9% increase from 2024 -- making a structured response process critical. The leading risk types include elevation of privilege (49%), remote code execution (34%), and information disclosure (7%). This skill covers building a repeatable Patch Tuesday response workflow from initial advisory review through testing, deployment, and validation.

When to Use

  • When deploying or configuring building patch tuesday response process capabilities in your environment
  • When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
  • When building or improving security architecture for this domain
  • When conducting security assessments that require this implementation

Prerequisites

  • Access to Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) update guide
  • Vulnerability management platform (Qualys VMDR, Rapid7, Tenable)
  • Patch deployment infrastructure (WSUS, SCCM/MECM, Intune, or third-party)
  • Test environment mirroring production configurations
  • Change management process (ITIL-based or equivalent)
  • Communication channels for cross-team coordination

Core Concepts

Patch Tuesday Timeline

DayActivityOwner
T+0 (Tuesday 10 AM PT)Microsoft releases patches and advisoriesMicrosoft
T+0 (Tuesday afternoon)Security team reviews advisories and triagesSecurity Ops
T+1 (Wednesday)Qualys/vendor scan signatures updatedVM Platform
T+1-T+2Emergency patches deployed for zero-daysIT Operations
T+2-T+5Test patches in staging environmentQA/IT Ops
T+5-T+7Deploy to Pilot group (5-10% of fleet)IT Operations
T+7-T+14Deploy to Production Ring 1 (servers)IT Operations
T+14-T+21Deploy to Production Ring 2 (workstations)IT Operations
T+21-T+30Validation scanning and compliance reportingSecurity Ops

Patch Categorization Framework

CategoryCriteriaResponse SLA
Zero-Day / ExploitedActive exploitation confirmed, CISA KEV listed24-48 hours
Critical RCECVSS >= 9.0, remote code execution, no auth required3-5 days
Critical with ExploitPublic exploit code or EPSS > 0.77 days
High SeverityCVSS 7.0-8.9, privilege escalation14 days
Medium SeverityCVSS 4.0-6.930 days
Low / InformationalCVSS < 4.0, defense-in-depthNext maintenance window

Microsoft Product Categories to Monitor

CategoryProductsRisk Level
Windows OSWindows 10, 11, Server 2016-2025Critical
Exchange ServerExchange 2016, 2019, OnlineCritical
SQL ServerSQL 2016-2022High
Office SuiteMicrosoft 365, Office 2019-2024High
.NET Framework.NET 4.x, .NET 6-9Medium
Azure ServicesAzure AD, Entra ID, Azure StackHigh
Edge/BrowserEdge Chromium, IE modeMedium
Development ToolsVisual Studio, VS CodeLow

Workflow

Step 1: Pre-Patch Tuesday Preparation (Monday before)

Preparation Checklist:
  [ ] Confirm WSUS/SCCM sync schedules are active
  [ ] Verify test environment is available and current
  [ ] Review outstanding patches from previous month
  [ ] Confirm monitoring dashboards are operational
  [ ] Pre-stage communication templates
  [ ] Ensure rollback procedures are documented
  [ ] Verify backup jobs ran successfully on critical servers

Step 2: Day-of Triage (Patch Tuesday)

Triage Process:
  1. Monitor MSRC Update Guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide)
  2. Review Microsoft Security Blog for advisory summaries
  3. Cross-reference with CISA KEV additions (same day)
  4. Check vendor advisories (Qualys, Rapid7, CrowdStrike analysis)
  5. Identify zero-day and actively exploited vulnerabilities
  6. Classify each CVE by severity and applicability
  7. Determine deployment rings and timeline for each patch
  8. Submit emergency change request for zero-day patches
  9. Communicate triage results to IT Operations and management

Step 3: Scan and Gap Analysis

# Post-Patch-Tuesday scan workflow
def run_patch_tuesday_scan(scanner_api, target_groups):
    """Trigger vulnerability scans after Patch Tuesday updates."""
    for group in target_groups:
        print(f"[*] Scanning {group['name']}...")
        scan_id = scanner_api.launch_scan(
            target=group["targets"],
            template="patch-tuesday-focused",
            credentials=group["creds"]
        )
        print(f"    Scan launched: {scan_id}")

    # Wait for scan completion, then generate report
    results = scanner_api.get_scan_results(scan_id)
    missing_patches = [r for r in results if r["status"] == "missing"]

    # Categorize by Patch Tuesday release
    current_month = [p for p in missing_patches
                     if p["vendor_advisory_date"] >= patch_tuesday_date]

    return {
        "total_missing": len(missing_patches),
        "current_month": len(current_month),
        "zero_day": [p for p in current_month if p.get("actively_exploited")],
        "critical": [p for p in current_month if p["cvss"] >= 9.0],
    }

Step 4: Ring-Based Deployment Strategy

Ring 0 - Emergency (0-48 hours):
    Scope:     Zero-day and actively exploited CVEs only
    Method:    Manual or targeted push (SCCM expedite)
    Targets:   Internet-facing servers, critical infrastructure
    Approval:  Emergency change, verbal CISO approval
    Rollback:  Immediate rollback if service degradation

Ring 1 - Pilot (Day 2-7):
    Scope:     All critical and high patches
    Method:    WSUS/SCCM automatic deployment
    Targets:   IT department machines, test group (5-10%)
    Approval:  Standard change with CAB notification
    Monitoring: 48-hour soak period, check for BSOD, app crashes

Ring 2 - Production Servers (Day 7-14):
    Scope:     All security patches
    Method:    SCCM maintenance windows (off-hours)
    Targets:   Production servers by tier
    Approval:  Standard change with CAB approval
    Monitoring: Application health checks, performance baseline

Ring 3 - Workstations (Day 14-21):
    Scope:     All security patches + quality updates
    Method:    Windows Update for Business / Intune
    Targets:   All managed workstations
    Approval:  Pre-approved standard change
    Monitoring: Help desk ticket monitoring for issues

Ring 4 - Stragglers (Day 21-30):
    Scope:     Catch remaining unpatched systems
    Method:    Forced deployment with restart
    Targets:   Systems that missed prior rings
    Approval:  Compliance-driven enforcement

Step 5: Validation and Reporting

Post-Deployment Validation:
  1. Re-scan environment with updated vulnerability signatures
  2. Compare pre-patch and post-patch scan results
  3. Calculate patch compliance rate per ring and department
  4. Identify failed patches and investigate root causes
  5. Generate compliance report for management review
  6. Update risk register with residual unpatched vulnerabilities
  7. Document exceptions and compensating controls

Best Practices

  1. Subscribe to MSRC notifications and vendor analysis blogs for early intelligence
  2. Maintain a dedicated Patch Tuesday war room or Slack/Teams channel
  3. Always patch zero-day vulnerabilities outside the normal ring schedule
  4. Test patches against critical business applications before broad deployment
  5. Track patch compliance metrics month-over-month for trend analysis
  6. Maintain rollback procedures for every deployment ring
  7. Coordinate with application owners for compatibility testing
  8. Document all exceptions with compensating controls and review dates

Common Pitfalls

  • Deploying all patches simultaneously without ring-based testing
  • Not scanning after patching to validate remediation
  • Treating all patches equally without risk-based prioritization
  • Ignoring cumulative update dependencies causing patch failures
  • Not accounting for server reboot requirements in maintenance windows
  • Failing to communicate patch status to business stakeholders

Related Skills

  • implementing-rapid7-insightvm-for-scanning
  • performing-cve-prioritization-with-kev-catalog
  • implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla
  • implementing-patch-management-workflow

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Assess exposure of Windows secrets protected by DPAPI, the operating system’s data protection service, during authorized security tests. Guide examination and decryption of saved credentials and browser data using available user sessions, credentials, or backup keys.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing saved credential exposure in authorized tests
  • Examining collected DPAPI files offline
  • Reviewing protected browser and RDP credentials
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Assess Shadow Credentials account takeover during authorized Active Directory testing. Examine permissions that allow public key registration, validate authentication without a password reset, and document credential cleanup, detection opportunities, and access control changes needed for remediation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Assessing risky permissions identified in BloodHound
  • Validating account takeover without resetting a password
  • Generating directory change records during security exercises
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Prepare for CMMC Level 2, a cybersecurity certification for defense contractors. Define the systems handling controlled information, review security requirements, calculate the SPRS assessment score, and organize remediation plans and evidence into a readiness report.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Define the assessment scope for systems handling controlled information
  • Calculate an SPRS score and prioritize unmet security requirements
  • Prepare security plans, remediation milestones, and assessment evidence
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Create disk images for investigations using dd or dcfldd on Linux. The workflow covers write protection, bit-for-bit copying, hash checks to verify integrity, and documentation of the acquisition process.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Preserving a suspect drive before investigation
  • Creating evidence copies of USB devices or memory cards
  • Verifying that a disk image matches its source
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Review Active Directory permissions with ldap3, a Python library for directory queries. Identify excessive access granted to non-administrative accounts, explain potential privilege escalation paths, and produce a JSON report with affected objects and remediation recommendations.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Auditing excessive Active Directory permissions
  • Investigating privilege escalation paths from ordinary accounts
  • Reporting affected objects and permission remediation recommendations
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

Inspect suspicious Android APK files without running them. Analyze permissions, app components, suspicious code patterns, and network indicators, then produce a JSON risk report to support malware triage and detection rule development.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Triage suspicious APK files without running them
  • Inspect dangerous permission combinations and suspicious API calls
  • Extract network indicators for malware detection rules
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.5万2026年8月31日 更新

查看 mukul975 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题