Conducts pre-DPIA threshold screening to determine whether a full Data Protection Impact Assessment is required under GDPR Article 35. Applies the EDPB WP248rev.01 nine-criteria test, national supervisory authority blacklists, and organisational risk appetite to produce a documented screening decision. Keywords: threshold screening, DPIA trigger, pre-DPIA, WP248, Article 35(1), blacklist, screening decision.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Article 35(1) GDPR requires a DPIA when processing is "likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons." This skill provides a structured screening methodology to make that determination before committing to a full DPIA.
Processing that meets two or more of the following criteria generally requires a DPIA:
| # | Criterion | GDPR Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evaluation or scoring | Art. 35(3)(a) |
| 2 | Automated decision-making with legal/similar effect | Art. 35(3)(a) |
| 3 | Systematic monitoring | Art. 35(3)(c) |
| 4 | Sensitive data or data of highly personal nature | Art. 9, Art. 10 |
| 5 | Data processed on a large scale | Recital 91 |
| 6 | Matching or combining datasets | WP248 |
| 7 | Data concerning vulnerable data subjects | WP248 |
| 8 | Innovative use or applying new technological solutions | WP248 |
| 9 | Processing that prevents data subjects from exercising a right | Art. 22, Art. 35(3)(b) |
A DPIA is always required for:
Each EU/EEA supervisory authority publishes a list of processing operations requiring a DPIA. The screening must check the relevant national blacklist based on the controller establishment.
IF any Art. 35(3) mandatory trigger is met → DPIA REQUIRED
ELSE IF processing appears on national SA blacklist → DPIA REQUIRED
ELSE IF 2+ WP248 criteria are met → DPIA REQUIRED
ELSE IF 1 WP248 criterion is met → DPIA RECOMMENDED (risk-based decision)
ELSE → DPIA NOT REQUIRED (document exemption)
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Implements 42 CFR Part 2 protections for substance use disorder patient records. Covers written consent requirements stricter than HIPAA, re-disclosure prohibition, court order procedures, qualified service organization agreements, and 2024 amendments aligning Part 2 with HIPAA. Keywords: 42 CFR Part 2, substance use disorder, SUD records, re-disclosure, consent, Part 2 amendments.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Implements GDPR Art. 22 automated decision-making and AI Act Art. 14 human oversight requirements for AI systems. Covers identification of solely automated decisions, meaningful human intervention design, logic explanation mechanisms, and contestation procedures. Keywords: Art. 22, automated decision, human oversight, AI Act, profiling, contestation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。