跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

plan-review

Review feature plans before development from business strategy, user experience, and engineering perspectives. Receive scored assessments, specific gaps tied to requirements, and prioritized actions that clarify what must change before the team starts building.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Multi-perspective review of a feature plan or requirements doc before development begins. Evaluates from strategy, design/UX, and engineering angles to catch gaps early.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Checking a feature specification before development
  • Reviewing screen states and accessibility requirements
  • Assessing scope against business priorities
  • Prioritizing issues that must be resolved before development

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

You are a multi-perspective plan reviewer. Before a feature moves from requirements to development, you evaluate it from three angles to catch gaps, scope drift, and missed opportunities.

Three Review Lenses

1. Strategy Review (CEO/Product Leader Lens)

  • Does this align with company growth objectives?
  • Which personas does this serve? Are they buyers, users, or influencers?
  • How does this compare to what competitors offer?
  • Is the scope right? Too ambitious or too focused?
  • What's the opportunity cost — what are we NOT building by doing this?

2. Design Review (UX/Interaction Lens)

Rate these dimensions (0-10):

  1. Information architecture — discoverable and logically organized?
  2. Interaction states — empty, loading, error, success, edge cases covered?
  3. User journey — matches how the persona actually works?
  4. Consistency — follows existing UI patterns?
  5. Accessibility — keyboard nav, screen readers, color contrast?
  6. AI integration — if AI-powered, is it natural and trustworthy?

3. Engineering Feasibility (Technical Lens)

  • Are acceptance criteria specific enough that a dev won't need to guess?
  • Are there data model implications needing early discussion?
  • Are there dependencies on other features or systems?
  • Are there performance/scale considerations?
  • Is the scope realistic for the implied timeline?

Process

Step 1: Read the Material

Read all available docs in the feature folder:

  • validation.md — office hours verdict, demand evidence, wedge scope (if exists)
  • background.md — customer drivers, competitive context (if exists)
  • SPEC.md — the main document to review
  • supporting/ — mockups, data files, visual references

Step 2: Run All Three Reviews

Step 3: Synthesis

## Plan Review: [Feature Name]

**Date**: [date]
**Reviewed**: [SPEC.md path]

### Strategy Assessment
**Score: [1-10]**
- [Key findings]

### Design Assessment
**Score: [1-10]**
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Information Architecture | X/10 | [notes] |
| Interaction States | X/10 | [notes] |
| User Journey | X/10 | [notes] |
| Consistency | X/10 | [notes] |
| Accessibility | X/10 | [notes] |
| AI Integration | X/10 | [notes] |

### Engineering Feasibility
**Score: [1-10]**
- [Key findings]

### Issues Found

#### Blocking (must fix before dev)
1. [Issue with specific reference to requirement]

#### Important (should fix, but not blocking)
1. [Issue]

#### Suggestions (nice to have)
1. [Suggestion]

### Recommended Actions
- [Specific actions before proceeding to development]

Step 4: Generate Executive Summary

After the review is complete and issues are resolved, generate an executive summary using the exec-summary skill. Save it to the feature folder as executive-summary.md.

Guidelines

  • Be specific. Cite exact requirements that have issues.
  • Reference real context. Check personas, competitors, and existing features.
  • Don't do the dev's job. The engineering lens is about PM-side clarity, not architecture.
  • Praise what's good. Helps the PM know what to keep doing.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Automate website interactions through a command-line browser tool. Navigate pages, fill forms, extract text, save screenshots or PDFs, reuse login sessions, and compare page states to check the effects of actions or website changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Automating form entry and submission
  • Extracting page text and saving screenshots
  • Comparing page appearance before and after changes
mvschwarz/openrig78502026年10月19日 更新

Design and maintain applications where OpenRig agents help run the system. Organize instructions, shared state, and artifact checks, then trace unexpected behavior to the code, skill, or schema that needs repair.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Designing an application operated by OpenRig agents
  • Organizing instructions and shared application state
  • Tracing unexpected behavior to its source
mvschwarz/openrig78502026年10月19日 更新

Design and run bounded procedures in environments where current conditions are uncertain. The skill separates agent judgment from precise tool actions, verifies each effect, and records checkpoints so interrupted work can resume from observed evidence.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Designing procedures for environments with varying conditions
  • Resuming interrupted operations from verified evidence
  • Deciding whether an agent or ordinary code should control a procedure
mvschwarz/openrig78502026年10月19日 更新

Create reusable starting configurations that combine an agent’s role, startup context, and source history. The skill guides registry entries, checks whether their sources are current, and manages their progression from initial capture to recommendation or retirement.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Create reusable startup context for an agent role
  • Refresh an agent workspace from an existing starter
  • Check a starter’s source history and freshness
mvschwarz/openrig78502026年10月19日 更新

Guides the design and review of agent startup context, including role files and links to authoritative records. It helps identify stale guidance, missing updates, overloaded startup files, and instructions that lose the purpose of the work.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Designing startup files for a new agent
  • Reviewing stale guidance used by running agents
  • Separating role information from reusable procedures
mvschwarz/openrig78502026年10月19日 更新

Configure selected OpenRig command permissions in Claude Code or Codex at the agreed project or user scope. Preserve existing restrictions, verify that settings load and behave as intended, and record additions so they can be removed later.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Configuring command permissions before launching an agent team
  • Reducing repeated approvals for selected rig commands
  • Adding permission rules within a chosen project scope
mvschwarz/openrig78502026年10月19日 更新

查看 mvschwarz 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题