Builds personal brand assets using Seth Godin's frameworks: signature symbol, slogan, surprise (Purple Cow), salient idea, and signature story. Use when named (branding), or when the user asks for a brand symbol, slogan, tagline, Purple Cow, counterintuitive angle, core idea, brand story, or personal brand positioning.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Personal brand workshop. Five Godin-based prompts. Load only what the query needs.
| User signals | Load |
|---|---|
| symbol, icon, mark, visual identity, mid-scroll, logo-like mark | prompts/signature-symbol.md |
| slogan, tagline, catchphrase, "what people repeat" | prompts/signature-slogan.md |
| surprise, Purple Cow, counterintuitive, contrarian truth, scroll-stop idea | prompts/signature-surprise.md |
| salient idea, core idea, positioning, "what I'm known for", one idea | prompts/salient-idea.md |
| brand story, origin story, narrative, about me story, 3-minute story | prompts/signature-story.md |
| "full brand", "all of it", "Godin system", unclear | Ask which step(s); offer the five names |
If the user wants a full pass, run in this order and reuse locked answers:
That order sharpens the idea before packaging it. Only use when they ask for a full system or explicitly say continue to the next step.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Formats output for ADHD-friendly action — lead with the next step, number tasks, restate state, cut fluff. Use when named (adhd), when the user mentions ADHD or focus/executive-function constraints, or when they ask for steps they can execute immediately.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Devil's-advocate attack on AI workflow designs — threat model, assumption challenges, code critiques, and hypothetical redesigns with no file edits. Use for "attack this design", devil's advocate, or hostile challenge on agents/tools/summarization/tokens. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or self-review that applies fixes (ai-systems-review). Prefer: this skill → decide → ai-systems-review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Hostile self-review of recently written AI workflow code that then applies fixes (agents, tools, chat context, summarization, tokens, attachments). Use after generating AI systems code, or when asked to self-review and harden it. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate attacks (adversarial-challenge). Prefer: adversarial-challenge → decide → this skill.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Writes in ASD-STE100 simplified technical English — short sentences, plain words, active voice. Use when the user wants terse technical prose, names this skill, or asks for STE100.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Disables the AI's default hedging, diplomatic softening, and social-nicety layers to deliver cold, unfiltered, consequentialist analysis on any topic. Use when the user wants the AI's actual assessment without padding, regardless of how harsh or uncomfortable the honest answer is.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Structured 3-phase peer review of a diff or PR — intent, issues by severity, then pointed merge-readiness questions and a verdict. Use for general code review. Not for AI workflow self-fix-and-edit (ai-systems-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate threat models (adversarial-challenge). Phase 3 asks questions only; it is not the adversarial-challenge skill.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。