跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

why

Iterative Five Whys root cause analysis drilling from symptoms to fundamentals

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Five Whys Analysis

Apply Five Whys root cause analysis to investigate issues by iteratively asking "why" to drill from symptoms to root causes.

Description

Iteratively ask "why" to move from surface symptoms to fundamental causes. Identifies systemic issues rather than quick fixes.

Usage

/why [issue_description]

Variables

  • ISSUE: Problem or symptom to analyze (default: prompt for input)
  • DEPTH: Number of "why" iterations (default: 5, adjust as needed)

Steps

  1. State the problem clearly
  2. Ask "Why did this happen?" and document the answer
  3. For that answer, ask "Why?" again
  4. Continue until reaching root cause (usually 5 iterations)
  5. Validate by working backwards: root cause → symptom
  6. Explore branches if multiple causes emerge
  7. Propose solutions addressing root causes, not symptoms

Examples

Example 1: Production Bug

Problem: Users see 500 error on checkout
Why 1: Payment service throws exception
Why 2: Request timeout after 30 seconds
Why 3: Database query takes 45 seconds
Why 4: Missing index on transactions table
Why 5: Index creation wasn't in migration scripts
Root Cause: Migration review process doesn't check query performance

Solution: Add query performance checks to migration PR template

Example 2: CI/CD Pipeline Failures

Problem: E2E tests fail intermittently
Why 1: Race condition in async test setup
Why 2: Test doesn't wait for database seed completion
Why 3: Seed function doesn't return promise
Why 4: TypeScript didn't catch missing return type
Why 5: strict mode not enabled in test config
Root Cause: Inconsistent TypeScript config between src and tests

Solution: Unify TypeScript config, enable strict mode everywhere

Example 3: Multi-Branch Analysis

Problem: Feature deployment takes 2 hours

Branch A (Build):
Why 1: Docker build takes 90 minutes
Why 2: No layer caching
Why 3: Dependencies reinstalled every time
Why 4: Cache invalidated by timestamp in Dockerfile
Root Cause A: Dockerfile uses current timestamp for versioning

Branch B (Tests):
Why 1: Test suite takes 30 minutes
Why 2: Integration tests run sequentially
Why 3: Test runner config has maxWorkers: 1
Why 4: Previous developer disabled parallelism due to flaky tests
Root Cause B: Flaky tests masked by disabling parallelism

Solutions: 
A) Remove timestamp from Dockerfile, use git SHA
B) Fix flaky tests, re-enable parallel test execution

Notes

  • Don't stop at symptoms; keep digging for systemic issues
  • Multiple root causes may exist - explore different branches
  • Document each "why" for future reference
  • Consider both technical and process-related causes
  • The magic isn't in exactly 5 whys - stop when you reach the true root cause
  • Stop when you hit systemic/process issues, not just technical details
  • Multiple root causes are common—explore branches separately
  • If "human error" appears, keep digging: why was error possible?
  • Document every "why" for future reference
  • Root cause usually involves: missing validation, missing docs, unclear process, or missing automation
  • Test solutions: implement → verify symptom resolved → monitor for recurrence

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

actualize

免费

Reconcile the project's FPF state with recent repository changes

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit17802026年8月27日 更新

add-task

免费

creates draft task file in .specs/tasks/draft/ with original user intent

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit17802026年8月27日 更新

Evaluate and improve Claude Code commands, skills, and agents. Use when testing prompt effectiveness, validating context engineering choices, or measuring improvement quality.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit17802026年8月27日 更新

analyse

免费

Auto-selects best Kaizen method (Gemba Walk, Value Stream, or Muda) for target

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit17802026年8月27日 更新

Comprehensive A3 one-page problem analysis with root cause and action plan

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit17802026年8月27日 更新

Analyze a GitHub issue and create a detailed technical specification

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit17802026年8月27日 更新

查看 NeoLabHQ 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题