跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

extract-features

Turn PRD.md into FEATURES.md: permanent feature IDs, MoSCoW priorities, acceptance criteria and the PRD requirement each feature comes from.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB
  • scripts/trace-check.py13.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

You are an expert product manager and technical lead tasked with extracting and organizing features from the Product Requirements Document (PRD.md, or the PRD provided in the conversation).

Create a comprehensive FEATURES.md file that clearly outlines all features, organized by priority and category. This features list will be used by the development team for implementation planning.

If PRD-REVIEW.md exists, read it too. Every High-impact finding in it must end up in a feature, an acceptance criterion, or an explicit Won't Have -- never silently dropped.

If any critical information is missing or unclear, ask specific questions before proceeding.

Extract and organize the features by:

  1. FEATURE IDENTIFICATION AND CATEGORIZATION:

    • Extract all explicit and implicit features from the PRD
    • Ensure each feature is discrete, specific, and implementable
    • Assign a unique identifier (e.g., F1, F2, F3)
    • Group by logical category (e.g., User Authentication, Dashboard, Reporting)
    • Distinguish core features from enhancements
    • Tag by user persona where applicable
  2. PRIORITIZATION:

    • Apply MoSCoW prioritization to each feature:
      • Must have: Critical for the minimum viable product
      • Should have: Important but not critical for initial release
      • Could have: Desirable but can be deferred
      • Won't have: Out of scope for current release but noted for future
    • Consider dependencies between features when prioritizing
  3. FEATURE DETAILING:

    • Clear, concise description for each feature
    • Acceptance criteria
    • Technical considerations or constraints
    • Potential edge cases or special handling requirements
  4. IMPLEMENTATION COMPLEXITY:

    • Relative complexity for each feature (Low, Medium, High)
    • Features requiring third-party integrations or special expertise
    • Features that may present significant technical challenges

Write every feature as a row in a table with these columns: | ID | Feature | Priority | Source | Complexity | Acceptance Criteria |. Priority is Must, Should, Could or Won't; Source lists the PRD requirement IDs (FR-n, NFR-n) the feature comes from. Every PRD requirement must be the source of at least one feature or be listed as Won't Have, and every out-of-scope item in the PRD gets a Won't Have row. Group the tables by category.

First, provide a brief overview of the product based on the PRD. Then create the FEATURES.md content with a summary section showing feature counts by priority and category.

If FEATURES.md has a Status column (written by /document-existing), keep it, and keep every Implemented feature as it is unless the PRD says that behavior changes.

Feature IDs are permanent. If FEATURES.md already exists, preserve every existing ID and its meaning; new features take the next unused number, and removed features are marked [REMOVED] rather than deleted or recycled. Never renumber -- the RFCs cite these IDs by number.

SELF-CHECK BEFORE FINISHING

  • Recount every summary table from the actual content. Never carry a count forward from earlier in your own output.
  • Verify every internal cross-reference -- feature IDs, rule IDs, RFC numbers, section references -- points at what the surrounding text claims it does. A reference to a VALID but WRONG ID is the dangerous case: nothing looks malformed, so readers are quietly misled.
  • Confirm no two tables in the document disagree with each other.
  • If trace-check.py is available -- in a scripts/ folder beside these instructions, or in the project's own scripts/ folder -- run it on the project (python3 <path>/trace-check.py .) and fix every FAIL it reports. It checks IDs, coverage and dependencies mechanically, which reading cannot do reliably.
  • State that you ran this check and what it turned up.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Interview the user about a product idea and write PRD.md. Use at the start of a new project, before features, rules or RFCs exist.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow3052026年10月9日 更新

Document an existing codebase as PRD.md, FEATURES.md and RULES.md, so new work is planned against the code as it is. Use instead of create-prd when the code already exists.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow3052026年10月9日 更新

Break the PRD into sequenced implementation RFCs under RFCs/ with an RFCS.md index, then cold-read each RFC for gaps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow3052026年10月9日 更新

Write RULES.md, the project standards the AI must follow, with registry-verified dependency versions and permanent rule IDs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow3052026年10月9日 更新

Implement one RFC: check its predecessors, present a plan for approval, write the code, then demonstrate every acceptance criterion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow3052026年10月9日 更新

Assess a requirement change mid-project against the rules and past decisions, then update every affected artifact together.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow3052026年10月9日 更新

查看 nurettincoban 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题