Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Mom Test questioning toolkit, JTBD analysis, interview conduct, assumption testing framework, and hypothesis design
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Understand if problem is real and worth solving.
Map the job-to-be-done and desired outcomes.
Challenge beliefs and uncover truth.
Distinguish interest from commitment.
Understand impact and urgency.
Do: Ask about past specifics | Open, non-directive questions | Seek commitment not praise | Keep informal | 80% listening | Talk about their life first
Avoid: Future behavior questions | Leading questions | Accepting compliments as validation | Talking >20% | Mentioning idea before understanding problem | Formal settings
Challenge when: belief without evidence | prediction about future | negative feedback dismissed | skipping to solution | single data point relied on
Tone: curious and supportive, not confrontational -- goal is truth-seeking.
| Category | Core Question |
|---|---|
| Value | Will customers want this? |
| Usability | Can customers use this? |
| Feasibility | Can we build this? |
| Viability | Does this work for our business? |
| Factor | Weight | Low (1) | Medium (2) | High (3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impact if wrong | 3 | Minor adjustment | Significant rework | Solution fails |
| Uncertainty | 2 | Have data | Mixed signals | Speculation |
| Ease of testing | 1 | Days, low cost | Weeks, moderate | Months, high cost |
Risk Score = (Impact x 3) + (Uncertainty x 2) + (Ease x 1)
| Priority | Score | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Test first | > 12 | Immediate |
| Test soon | 8-12 | Schedule |
| Test later | < 8 | Backlog |
We believe [doing X] for [user type] will achieve [outcome].
We will know this is TRUE when we see [measurable signal].
We will know this is FALSE when we see [counter-signal or absence of signal].
| Category | Methods |
|---|---|
| Value | Landing page, Fake door, Mom Test interviews |
| Usability | Prototype testing, 5-second tests, Task completion |
| Feasibility | Spike, Technical prototype, Expert review |
| Viability | Lean Canvas review, Stakeholder interviews |
| Result | Criteria | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Proven | >80% meet success criteria | Proceed |
| Disproven | <20% meet criteria | Pivot or kill |
| Inconclusive | 20-80% | Increase sample, try different method, segment |
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。