跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

nw-quality-validation

Type-specific validation checklists, six quality characteristics, and quality gate thresholds for documentation assessment

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Quality Validation

Six Quality Characteristics

  • Accuracy: Factually correct, technically sound, current | Validation: expert review, automated testing
  • Completeness: All necessary info present for doc type | Validation: checklist, gap analysis
  • Clarity: Easy to understand, logical flow, appropriate level | Validation: Flesch 70-80
  • Consistency: Uniform terminology, formatting, structure | Validation: style guide compliance
  • Correctness: Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation | Validation: automated check, zero errors
  • Usability: User achieves goal efficiently | Validation: task success, DIVIO type purpose served

Quality Gate Thresholds

MetricThreshold
Readability (Flesch)70-80
Spelling errors0
Broken links0
Style compliance95%+
Type purity80%+ single type

Type-Specific Validation Checklists

Tutorial Checklist

  • Completable without external references | [ ] Steps numbered and sequential
  • Each step has verifiable outcome | [ ] No assumed prior knowledge | [ ] Builds confidence

How-to Checklist

  • Clear goal stated upfront | [ ] Assumes fundamentals known
  • Single task focus | [ ] Ends with completion indicator | [ ] No basics teaching

Reference Checklist

  • All parameters documented | [ ] Return values specified
  • Error conditions listed | [ ] Examples per entry | [ ] No narrative

Explanation Checklist

  • Addresses "why" not "what" | [ ] Provides context and reasoning
  • Discusses alternatives | [ ] No task steps | [ ] Builds conceptual model

Verdict Criteria

  • approved: Passes all type-specific validation, no collapse violations, meets quality gates
  • needs-revision: Minor issues fixable in place (clarity, missing examples, small gaps)
  • restructure-required: Collapse detected requiring split, or fundamental type mismatch

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nWave-ai/nWave6222026年9月16日 更新

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nWave-ai/nWave6222026年9月16日 更新

Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nWave-ai/nWave6222026年9月16日 更新

Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nWave-ai/nWave6222026年9月16日 更新

5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nWave-ai/nWave6222026年9月16日 更新

Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nWave-ai/nWave6222026年9月16日 更新

查看 nWave-ai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题