Check which AI providers Octopus can use before running a workflow. Get a compact table of availability, authentication, selected models, and billing categories, followed by prioritized fixes for detected problems.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Starter: one-screen provider health summary — availability, auth method, version drift, and cost posture for every seatable provider
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Produce a one-screen health summary of every provider Octopus can seat, so the user knows what a workflow will actually dispatch to before spending money.
The user asks "what providers do I have?", a workflow banner showed (unavailable - skipping), or a session is starting on a new machine.
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/helpers/check-providers.sh and ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/helpers/check-versions.sh.CLAUDE_SDK_API_KEY is set (Agent SDK, Opus 5 by default, 1M context). Flag Claude Code older than v2.1.280 for Opus 5.5, older than v2.1.219 for Opus 5, and Codex CLI older than v0.144.0 for GPT-5.6.grok login, opencode auth login, key export).A single table, one row per provider, columns: Provider, Status, Auth, Model, Cost. Below it, at most three ranked fix-it lines. No prose beyond that.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Interpret the saved results of a completed AI council review. Count verdicts, check whether enough participants responded and whether models are independent, surface substantive dissent, and explain what action the outcome supports.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Turn a technical choice into a structured debate between different AI model families. Assign explicit positions, launch the discussion, and summarize agreement, disagreement, and a recommendation supported by the strongest argument that survives the debate.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Clarify a feature’s requirements with multiple AI providers, combining technical constraints with user and business needs. Produce a scoped definition covering priorities, edge cases, exclusions, and a requirements checklist before implementation begins.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Review code or documents with available AI providers before delivery. Combine findings into a scored validation report that checks prior requirements and decisions, separates critical issues from warnings, and recommends next steps.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Develop complex features or business documents by gathering approaches from available AI providers. Combine their perspectives with prior project decisions and quality checks to produce a proposed plan, then proceed with implementation after user confirmation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Research technical or business questions through multiple available AI providers, each assigned a different perspective. Combine usable results into a report covering findings, disagreements, evidence gaps, priorities, and recommended next steps.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。