Starter: interpret a council run's verdict artifacts — quorum, dissent, cross-lab validity, and what to do next
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Build a behavior change with observed red, minimal green, and measured test consolidation
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Host: Codex CLI — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex. Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than
/octo:*slash commands. Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it. For host tool equivalents, seeskills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md.
Read skills/blocks/engineering-method-selection.md from the installed plugin
for review admission. Natural-language requests and --peer-review share that
policy. Honor host-only requests; risk alone does not authorize paid usage.
Run the red, green, and refactor cycle on the current host. Routine TDD makes
zero additional provider dispatches. Use one external reviewer only when the
user passes --peer-review, explicitly requests independent review, or an
existing risk policy requires it. Explicit debate, council, and multi-model
commands retain their own execution contracts.
Do not change production behavior until a focused test fails for the expected reason. Existing implementation outside the requested change remains intact.
If a test passes before implementation, it is not red evidence. If it errors due to fixture or syntax problems, repair the test until it fails on the missing behavior.
Do not equate similar assertions with duplicate guarantees. Keep separate OS,
security, cancellation, and integration boundaries. For every removed test,
record old_test, behavior, replacement, mutant, red_observed,
baseline_ms, candidate_ms, and reason. The retained test must kill the
named mutant at the intended caller boundary.
After one warm-up, measure five isolated runs and report every sample and the median. Review a slowdown only when it exceeds both 20 percent and 100 ms.
Completion requires observed red and green evidence, affected-suite results, and the consolidation ledger when tests were removed. A missing reviewer is reported as incomplete review, never simulated.
If the same test remains red after two implementation attempts, stop and recheck the test boundary, fixture, and expected behavior. The strategy-rotation hook is a signal to try a fundamentally different hypothesis, not another variation of the same patch.
Adapted from DEEPENING in mattpocock/skills at commit
3cca18b368ae95cdbdebbff572ccafa662551015 under the MIT License. See
THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Starter: interpret a council run's verdict artifacts — quorum, dissent, cross-lab validity, and what to do next
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Starter: frame a decision as a multi-model debate — picks sides, seats providers, and launches /octo:debate with a well-formed motion
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Multi-AI requirements scoping using available external providers (Double Diamond Define phase). Priority triggers: octo define, octo scope, co-define, co-scope. DO NOT use for implementation, research, review/validation, or built-in commands.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Multi-AI validation, scoring, and review using available external providers (Double Diamond Deliver phase)
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Multi-AI implementation using available external providers (Double Diamond Develop phase). DO NOT use for simple code edits, reading/reviewing code, built-in commands, or trivial single-file changes.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Multi-AI research using available external providers (Double Diamond Discover phase)
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。