Interactive idea refinement using Socratic method to develop fully-formed designs
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Skills wiki intro - mandatory workflows, search tool, brainstorming triggers
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Your personal wiki of proven techniques, patterns, and tools at ~/.claude/skills/.
DO NOT use @ links - they force-load entire files, burning 200k+ context instantly.
INSTEAD, use skill path references:
skills/category/skill-name (no @ prefix, no /SKILL.md suffix)skills/collaboration/brainstorming or skills/testing/test-driven-developmentWhen you see skill references in documentation:
skills/path/name → Use Read tool on ~/.claude/skills/path/name/SKILL.md1. Search skills:
~/.claude/skills/getting-started/skills-search PATTERN
2. Search conversations: Dispatch subagent (see Workflow 2) to check for relevant past work.
If skills found:
~/.claude/skills/path/skill-name/SKILL.md"This doesn't count as a task" is rationalization. Skills/conversations exist and you didn't search for them or didn't use them = failed task.
When: Your human partner mentions past work, issue feels familiar, starting task in familiar domain, stuck/blocked, before reinventing
When NOT: Info in current convo, codebase state questions, first encounter, partner wants fresh thinking
How (use subagent for 50-100x context savings):
~/.claude/skills/collaboration/remembering-conversations/tool/prompts/search-agent.mdExample:
Partner: "How did we handle auth errors in React Router?"
You: Searching past conversations...
[Dispatch subagent → 350-word synthesis]
[Apply without loading 50k tokens]
Red flags: Reading .jsonl files directly, pasting excerpts, asking "which conversation?", browsing archives
Pattern: Search → Subagent synthesizes → Apply. Fast, focused, context-efficient.
Every time you start using a skill, announce it:
"I'm using the [Skill Name] skill to [what you're doing]."
Examples:
Why: Transparency helps your human partner understand your process and catch errors early.
If a skill contains a checklist, you MUST create TodoWrite todos for EACH checklist item.
Don't:
Why: Checklists without TodoWrite tracking = steps get skipped. Every time.
Examples: TDD (write test, watch fail, implement, verify), Systematic Debugging (4 phases), Creating Skills (RED-GREEN-REFACTOR)
Really, try skills-search first.
Categories: skills/INDEX.md → testing, debugging, coding, architecture, collaboration, meta Individual skill: Load from category INDEX
when_to_use match your situation?Many skills contain rigid rules (TDD, debugging, verification). Follow them exactly. Don't adapt away the discipline.
Some skills are flexible patterns (architecture, naming). Adapt core principles to your context.
The skill itself tells you which type it is.
When writing documentation that references other skills:
Use path format without @ prefix or /SKILL.md suffix:
skills/testing/test-driven-developmentskills/debugging/systematic-debugging@skills/testing/test-driven-development/SKILL.md (force-loads, burns context)Why no @ links: @ syntax force-loads files immediately, consuming 200k+ context before you need them.
To read a skill reference: Use Read tool on ~/.claude/skills/category/skill-name/SKILL.md
Found something valuable? See skills/meta/creating-skills
Want a skill that doesn't exist? Edit skills/REQUESTS.md (at ~/.claude/skills/REQUESTS.md)
Starting conversation? You just read this. Good.
Starting any task? Run skills-search first, announce usage, follow what you find.
Skill has checklist? TodoWrite for every item.
Skills are mandatory when they exist, not optional.
In the first response after reading this guide, you MUST announce to the user that you have read the getting started guide
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Interactive idea refinement using Socratic method to develop fully-formed designs
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Receive and act on code review feedback with technical rigor, not performative agreement or blind implementation
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Comment WHY code exists and non-obvious decisions, not WHAT code does (mechanics)
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Replace arbitrary timeouts with condition polling for reliable async tests
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
TDD for process documentation - test with subagents before writing, iterate until bulletproof
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs impossible
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。