跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

finishing-a-development-branch

在实现完成后检查全部测试,让用户选择本地合并、创建拉取请求或保留现状,并执行所选操作,再根据选择和工作环境整理分支与工作区。

原文查看原文说明

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work

AI 评分90分/ 100查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 在本地合并已完成的功能
  • 推送分支并创建拉取请求
  • 保留已完成的修改以便日后整合
  • 合并后整理工作区

中文介绍

功能

协助已完成实现的开发分支完成测试检查、整合方式选择和清理。首先确认全部测试通过,再检查当前使用的是主工作区还是独立工作区,以及是否位于有名称的分支上。随后提供本地合并、创建 Pull Request 或保留现状的选项,并执行用户的选择。合并后会再次运行测试,只有测试通过,才整理相关工作区和分支。

适用场景

适合在开发结束后决定如何整合修改。流程也包括保留用于评审的工作区,以及在清理前检查尚未提交的文件,便于处理需要继续评审或稍后整合的工作。

使用示例

  • “检查已完成的修改,并列出可选的整合方式。”
  • “推送这个分支并创建 Pull Request。”

注意事项

需要 Git 和项目的测试运行环境。测试失败时会停止完成流程。创建 Pull Request 时会使用托管平台的命令行工具等方式,创建后仍保留工作区。对于未处于具名分支上的 detached HEAD 状态,不提供本地合并选项。丢弃修改必须由用户明确提出,并输入 discard 确认。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

客观评估

AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。

指令清晰度能否看出何时使用、做什么
A良好明确说明在实现完成后检查测试、选择整合方式并清理。
步骤具体性步骤、输入输出和示例是否具体
A良好分步骤列出环境判断、选项菜单及合并和移除工作区的命令。
安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
A良好整合由用户选择,丢弃需输入discard,删除未提交文件需确认。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
B部分不足需要Git、测试环境和创建拉取请求的工具,但未说明安装及认证步骤。

总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月19日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md7.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Finishing a Development Branch

Overview

Core principle: Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.

Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."

Step 1: Verify Tests

Run the project's full test suite (npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...).

If tests fail, report the failures and stop — the menu comes after a green suite:

Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:

[Show failures]

If tests pass: continue to Step 2.

Step 2: Detect Environment

GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
# Capture now, while still inside the workspace — Step 5 changes directory
# before cleanup (Step 6) needs this value
WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)

This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works:

StateMenuCleanup
GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (normal repo)Standard 3 optionsNo worktree to clean up
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, named branchStandard 3 optionsProvenance-based (see Step 6)
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, detached HEADReduced 2 options (no merge)Externally managed — leave in place

Step 3: Determine Base Branch

The base branch is whatever this work forked from — usually named in the plan, the conversation, or the branch's upstream. If it is not already known, ask: "This branch split from <your best guess> - is that correct?" Confirm before merging: merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo.

Step 4: Present Options

Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 3 options:

Implementation complete. What would you like to do?

1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)

Which option?

Detached HEAD — present exactly these 2 options:

Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace).

1. Push as new branch and create a Pull Request
2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later)

Which option?

Present the menu exactly as written — concise, with every option coming from the list above. Discarding the work happens only in response to your human partner explicitly asking for it (see "If your human partner asks to discard the work" below). Wait for their answer; the integration decision is theirs.

Step 5: Execute Choice

Option 1: Merge Locally

# Get main repo root for CWD safety
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"

# Merge first — verify success before removing anything
git checkout <base-branch>
git pull
git merge <feature-branch>

# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>

If tests fail on the merged result: stop, leave the worktree and branch in place, and investigate — nothing has been pushed, so the merge is local and recoverable.

Once the merged result is green: clean up the worktree (Step 6), then delete the branch:

git branch -d <feature-branch>

Option 2: Push and Create PR

git push -u origin <feature-branch>
# From a detached HEAD, name the new branch on the remote:
# git push origin HEAD:refs/heads/<new-branch>

Then create the pull/merge request against <base-branch> with the forge's tooling — its CLI if one is available, or the creation URL most forges print when you push — following the repo's PR template and conventions if present, and report the URL to your human partner.

Keep the worktree — your human partner iterates on PR feedback there.

Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>."

If your human partner asks to discard the work

This path exists only as a response to an explicit request to throw the work away. Confirm first:

This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>

Type 'discard' to confirm.

Wait for that exact confirmation. When it arrives:

MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"

Then clean up the worktree (Step 6) and force-delete the branch:

git branch -D <feature-branch>

Step 6: Cleanup Workspace

Runs for Option 1 and confirmed discards. Options 2 and 3 always preserve the worktree. Both callers have already changed directory to the main repo root — worktree removal must run from outside the worktree — and use the GIT_DIR/GIT_COMMON/WORKTREE_PATH values captured in Step 2, from before that directory change.

If GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON: Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done.

If WORKTREE_PATH is under .worktrees/ or worktrees/: Superpowers created this worktree — we own cleanup:

git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH"
git worktree prune  # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations

If removal is refused (contains modified or untracked files): the worktree holds files that exist nowhere else — uncommitted plans, notes, or scratch work. Never --force on your own initiative. Show your human partner what is at stake and ask:

git -C "$WORKTREE_PATH" status --porcelain -uall
Worktree removal refused — these files were never committed:

<file list>

1. Commit them to <branch> before cleanup
2. Move them into <main repo root>
3. Delete them (unrecoverable)

Which?

Carry out the choice, then remove the worktree.

Otherwise: The host environment owns this workspace — leave it in place. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it.

Quick Reference

OptionMergePushKeep WorktreeCleanup Branch
1. Merge locallyyes--yes
2. Create PR-yesyes-
3. Keep as-is--yes-
Discard (explicit request only)---yes (force)

Common Rationalizations

ExcuseReality
"Tests passed earlier this session"Run the suite on the tree you are about to integrate. A green run only proves the tree it ran on.
"They obviously want it merged"Integration is your human partner's decision. Present the menu and wait.
"They seem done with this feature — I'll offer to discard it"The menu is complete as written. Discard happens only when your human partner asks for it in so many words.
"'Yeah, get rid of it' counts as confirmation"Only the typed word discard authorizes deletion.
"The PR is up, so the worktree is clutter now"PR feedback gets fixed in that worktree. It stays until the work lands.
"This other worktree looks stale — I'll clean it too"Clean up only worktrees under .worktrees/ or worktrees/. Everything else belongs to the host.
"Removal refused — --force is just finishing the cleanup"The refusal means files exist only in that worktree. --force destroys them permanently. Show your human partner and ask.
"The merged-result failure is probably flaky"A failing merged result stops everything. Branch and worktree stay put while you investigate.
"The base branch is obviously main"Confirm the fork point or ask. Merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo.
"The push was rejected — force-push will fix it"A rejected push means the remote moved. Investigate; force-push only on your human partner's explicit request.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

brainstorming

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

在开始新功能或项目之前,通过对话明确目的、偏好和限制。根据需要用图示或原型核对理解,并按工作规模整理说明或设计文档。

  • 明确新功能的目的
  • 整理演讲或商业构想
  • 比较界面或房间布局
obra/superpowers30.3万2026年10月21日 更新

diagnosing-superpowers

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

读取 superpowers 会话记录,调查重复工作、偏离计划、耗时及令牌消耗。以文件路径和行号为依据整理经过,生成有证据支持的报告。

  • 调查重复工作或偏离计划的情况
  • 查看会话耗时和令牌消耗
  • 确认技能是否被使用
obra/superpowers30.3万2026年10月21日 更新

dispatching-parallel-agents

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

将相互独立的缺陷或测试失败分配给不同代理,并行调查和修复。明确各自范围与报告要求,再检查修改冲突、运行完整测试并整合结果。

  • 调查原因互不相关的测试失败
  • 修复不同功能中的独立缺陷
  • 明确多个代理的工作范围
obra/superpowers30.3万2026年10月21日 更新

executing-plans

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

在同一会话中逐项执行已有的实施计划,确认测试先失败后通过,记录进度与判断,并在全部任务结束后审查整个分支的更改。

  • 执行已有的开发计划
  • 不另派实施代理完成工作
  • 根据进度记录恢复任务
obra/superpowers30.3万2026年10月21日 更新

receiving-code-review

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

将代码审查意见与实际代码、支持的运行环境及现有行为进行核对,确认建议是否合理,梳理疑问并依据技术证据回复,再逐项修改和测试。

  • 梳理含糊的代码审查意见
  • 核实建议修改的兼容性
  • 检查拟扩展的功能是否实际使用
obra/superpowers30.3万2026年10月21日 更新

requesting-code-review

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

在功能实现后或合并前,请另一个智能体审查代码。整理修改内容、需求和目标提交范围,再根据审查意见的严重程度推进修复。

  • 大型功能实现后的代码审查
  • 合并前检查修改
  • 为复杂问题修复寻求独立审查
obra/superpowers30.3万2026年10月21日 更新

查看 obra 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题