跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

github-ops

Workflow for repository reconnaissance and operations using GitHub CLI (gh). Optimizes token usage by using structured API queries instead of blind file fetching.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

集成工具GitHub
查看安装方法

包含的文件(11)

  • SKILL.md6.9 KB
  • commands/github-ops.md110 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs310 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs530 B
  • references/.gitkeep37 B
  • references/research-requirements.md1.3 KB
  • rules/github-ops.md813 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json627 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json254 B
  • scripts/main.cjs994 B
  • templates/implementation-template.md646 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

GitHub Ops Skill

Provides structured guidance for repository reconnaissance using gh api and gh search.

Overview

Repository reconnaissance often fails when agents guess file paths or attempt to fetch large files blindly. This skill enforces a structured Map -> Identify -> Fetch sequence using the GitHub CLI to minimize token waste and improve reliability.

⚡ Essential Reconnaissance Commands

Use these commands to understand a repository structure before fetching content.

1. List Repository Root

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents --jq '.[].name'

2. List Specific Directory

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents/{path} --jq '.[].name'

3. Fetch File Content (Base64 Decoded)

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents/{path} --jq '.content' | base64 -d

4. Search for Pattern in Repository

gh search code "{pattern}" --repo {owner}/{repo}

5. Get Repository Metadata

gh repo view {owner}/{repo} --json description,stargazerCount,updatedAt

🔄 Token-Efficient Workflow

  1. Map Tree: List the root and core directories (commands, src, docs).
  2. Identify Entrypoints: Look for README.md, gemini-extension.json, package.json, or SKILL.md.
  3. Targeted Fetch: Download only the entrypoints first.
  4. Deep Dive: Use gh search code to find logic patterns rather than reading every file.

🛡️ Platform Safety (Windows)

  • When using base64 -d, ensure the output is redirected to a file using the Write tool if it's large.
  • Avoid Linux-style /dev/stdin patterns in complex pipes.
  • Use native paths for any local storage.

Iron Laws

  1. ALWAYS follow the Map → Identify → Fetch sequence before reading any file — blindly fetching files by guessed path wastes tokens, triggers 404s, and produces hallucinated repo structure.
  2. NEVER fetch a file without first listing its parent directory or confirming it exists via gh api — large files fetched unnecessarily can exhaust the context window.
  3. ALWAYS use --jq to filter gh api JSON output to only the fields needed — unfiltered API responses contain hundreds of irrelevant fields that inflate token usage.
  4. NEVER use gh search code without a scoping qualifier (repo, org, or path) — unscoped code search returns results from all of GitHub, producing irrelevant noise.
  5. ALWAYS prefer gh api structured queries over reading repository files directly when repository metadata is needed — API queries are faster, structured, and don't require authentication context for public repos.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Guessing file paths and fetching them directlyHigh 404 rate; wasted tokens on non-existent pathsMap root tree first: gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/git/trees/HEAD --jq '.tree[].path'
Fetching entire files for a single fieldLarge files exhaust context; slow and impreciseUse --jq to extract only the required field from API response
Unscoped gh search code queriesReturns GitHub-wide results; noise overwhelms signalAlways add --repo owner/name or --owner org scope qualifier
Reading binary or generated filesBinary content is unreadable; generated files change frequentlyIdentify file type first; skip binaries; read source files only
Sequential API calls for each fileUnnecessary round-trips inflate latencyBatch: use gh api trees or search to identify multiple targets, then fetch in parallel

GitHub MCP Server Operations

When the official GitHub MCP server (@modelcontextprotocol/server-github) is configured, use these higher-level tools for repository management and automation:

// settings.json configuration
"github": {
  "command": "npx",
  "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"],
  "env": { "GITHUB_PERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" }
}

PR Automation Pattern

# Create PR with auto-generated description
gh pr create \
  --title "feat: add feature X" \
  --body "$(gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/compare/{base}...{head} --jq '.commits[].commit.message' | head -5)" \
  --base main \
  --head feature/x

# Auto-merge after CI passes
gh pr merge --auto --squash --delete-branch

Issue Management

# List open issues by label
gh issue list --label "bug" --state open --json number,title,assignees

# Bulk-close resolved issues
gh issue list --label "stale" --json number --jq '.[].number' | \
  xargs -I{} gh issue close {} --comment "Closing as stale"

# Create issue from template
gh issue create \
  --title "Bug: [description]" \
  --body-file .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md \
  --label "bug,needs-triage"

Release Automation

# Create release with auto-generated notes
gh release create v1.2.0 \
  --generate-notes \
  --title "v1.2.0" \
  --target main

# Upload release assets
gh release upload v1.2.0 dist/*.tar.gz dist/*.zip

Workflow Management

# Trigger workflow manually
gh workflow run deploy.yml --field environment=production

# Watch workflow run
gh run watch $(gh run list --workflow=deploy.yml --limit=1 --json databaseId --jq '.[0].databaseId')

# Download workflow artifacts
gh run download --name=build-artifacts --dir=./artifacts

Assigned Agents

  • artifact-integrator: Lead agent for repository onboarding.
  • developer: PR management and exploration.

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting: Read .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing:

  • New pattern -> .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
  • Issue found -> .claude/context/memory/issues.md
  • Decision made -> .claude/context/memory/decisions.md

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

查看 oimiragieo 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题