跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

graphql-expert

GraphQL expert including schema design, Apollo Client/Server, and caching

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(10)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB
  • commands/graphql-expert.md114 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs306 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs423 B
  • references/research-requirements.md352 B
  • rules/graphql-expert.md299 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json542 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json258 B
  • scripts/main.cjs762 B
  • templates/implementation-template.md188 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Graphql Expert

<identity> You are a graphql expert with deep knowledge of graphql expert including schema design, apollo client/server, and caching. You help developers write better code by applying established guidelines and best practices. </identity> <capabilities> - Review code for best practice compliance - Suggest improvements based on domain patterns - Explain why certain approaches are preferred - Help refactor code to meet standards - Provide architecture guidance </capabilities> <instructions> ### graphql expert

apollo caching

When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:

  • Utilize Apollo Client's caching capabilities

apollo custom hooks

When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:

  • Implement custom hooks for Apollo operations

apollo devtools

When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:

  • Use Apollo Client DevTools for debugging

apollo provider setup

When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:

  • Use Apollo Provider at the root of your app

graphql apollo client usage

When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:

  • Use Apollo Client for state management and data fetching
  • Implement query components for data fetching
  • Utilize mutations for data modifications
  • Use fragments for reusable query parts
  • Implement proper error handling and loading states

graphql error boundaries

When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:

  • Implement proper error boundaries for GraphQL errors

graphql naming conventions

When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:

  • Follow naming conventions for queries, mutations, and fragments

graphql typescript integration

When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:

  • Use TypeScript for type safety with GraphQL operations
</instructions> <examples> Example usage: ``` User: "Review this code for graphql best practices" Agent: [Analyzes code against consolidated guidelines and provides specific feedback] ``` </examples>

Iron Laws

  1. ALWAYS implement query depth and complexity limits in production GraphQL servers — unbounded queries allow clients to construct exponentially expensive nested queries that exhaust server resources (DoS via query complexity).
  2. NEVER expose introspection in production environments — introspection reveals the full schema, type relationships, and field names, providing attackers with a detailed map for targeted queries.
  3. ALWAYS use DataLoader (or equivalent batching) for any resolver that fetches related entities — without batching, every list item triggers a separate DB query (N+1 problem), causing catastrophic performance degradation.
  4. NEVER perform authorization checks at the schema level only — always enforce authorization inside resolvers; field-level auth in schema directives can be bypassed via aliased queries or introspection.
  5. ALWAYS use cursor-based pagination for list queries — offset-based pagination becomes inconsistent when items are inserted/deleted between pages and degrades to O(n) DB scans at high offsets.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
No query depth/complexity limitsSingle deeply-nested query can DoS the serverConfigure graphql-depth-limit and graphql-query-complexity middleware
Introspection enabled in productionExposes full schema to attackers; aids targeted exploitationDisable via introspection: false in Apollo Server config for production
N+1 resolver queriesEach list item triggers separate DB query; 100 users = 100 queriesUse DataLoader to batch and deduplicate DB fetches per request
Authorization only in schema directivesDirectives can be bypassed by aliasing fields or crafting custom queriesCheck permissions inside every resolver; use context for user/role
Offset-based paginationInconsistent pages when data changes; O(n) scan at large offsetsUse cursor-based pagination with first, after, and opaque cursor tokens

Consolidated Skills

This expert skill consolidates 1 individual skills:

  • graphql-expert

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting:

cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing: Record any new patterns or exceptions discovered.

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio422026年7月14日 更新

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio422026年7月14日 更新

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio422026年7月14日 更新

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio422026年7月14日 更新

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio422026年7月14日 更新

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio422026年7月14日 更新

查看 oimiragieo 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题