Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
GraphQL expert including schema design, Apollo Client/Server, and caching
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| No query depth/complexity limits | Single deeply-nested query can DoS the server | Configure graphql-depth-limit and graphql-query-complexity middleware |
| Introspection enabled in production | Exposes full schema to attackers; aids targeted exploitation | Disable via introspection: false in Apollo Server config for production |
| N+1 resolver queries | Each list item triggers separate DB query; 100 users = 100 queries | Use DataLoader to batch and deduplicate DB fetches per request |
| Authorization only in schema directives | Directives can be bypassed by aliasing fields or crafting custom queries | Check permissions inside every resolver; use context for user/role |
| Offset-based pagination | Inconsistent pages when data changes; O(n) scan at large offsets | Use cursor-based pagination with first, after, and opaque cursor tokens |
This expert skill consolidates 1 individual skills:
Before starting:
cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
After completing: Record any new patterns or exceptions discovered.
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。