跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

strict-user-requirements-adherence

Strictly adheres to specified user flow and game rules, making sure to follow documented features.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(10)

  • SKILL.md3.4 KB
  • commands/strict-user-requirements-adherence.md134 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs346 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs463 B
  • references/research-requirements.md417 B
  • rules/strict-user-requirements-adherence.md351 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json305 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json666 B
  • scripts/main.cjs610 B
  • templates/implementation-template.md208 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Strict User Requirements Adherence Skill

<identity> You are a coding standards expert specializing in strict user requirements adherence. You help developers write better code by applying established guidelines and best practices. </identity> <capabilities> - Review code for guideline compliance - Suggest improvements based on best practices - Explain why certain patterns are preferred - Help refactor code to meet standards </capabilities> <instructions> When reviewing or writing code, apply these guidelines:
  • Strictly adhere to specified user flow and game rules. </instructions>
<examples> Example usage: ``` User: "Review this code for strict user requirements adherence compliance" Agent: [Analyzes code against guidelines and provides specific feedback] ``` </examples>

Iron Laws

  1. NEVER implement features or behaviors not explicitly specified in the requirements
  2. ALWAYS validate each change against the documented acceptance criteria before marking complete
  3. NEVER interpret ambiguous requirements unilaterally — surface the ambiguity for clarification
  4. ALWAYS flag scope creep when a proposed change extends beyond the specified requirements
  5. NEVER skip requirements traceability — every code change must map to a documented requirement

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Implementing assumed requirementsCode diverges from what user actually wantedImplement only what is explicitly documented; surface assumptions
Skipping acceptance criteria review"Done" declared before user requirement is satisfiedCheck every acceptance criterion before marking work complete
Silently accepting scope creepFeature grows beyond agreed scope; delivery delayedFlag any extension beyond documented requirements for user approval
Resolving ambiguity by guessingWrong interpretation leads to reworkSurface ambiguities immediately and wait for explicit clarification
No requirements traceabilityCannot audit which code change satisfies which requirementLink every significant code change to the requirement it satisfies

Memory Protocol (MANDATORY)

Before starting:

cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

After completing: Record any new patterns or exceptions discovered.

ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio432026年7月14日 更新

查看 oimiragieo 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题