跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

task-delegation

Agent task delegation patterns — spawn protocols, handoff metadata, drain gate, parallel limits, and model selection for multi-agent orchestration

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(10)

  • SKILL.md8.0 KB
  • commands/task-delegation.md115 B
  • hooks/post-execute.cjs183 B
  • hooks/pre-execute.cjs289 B
  • references/research-requirements.md290 B
  • rules/task-delegation.md289 B
  • schemas/input.schema.json492 B
  • schemas/output.schema.json259 B
  • scripts/main.cjs1014 B
  • templates/implementation-template.md189 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Task Delegation Skill

When to Invoke

Skill({ skill: 'task-delegation' });

Use when:

  • Spawning subagents to perform work
  • Decomposing a complex task into parallel or sequential subtasks
  • Implementing handoff metadata between agents
  • Verifying pipeline completion via drain gate
  • Selecting the right model for a spawned agent

Core Protocol: Spawn → Update → Drain

Every delegation sequence follows three phases:

1. SPAWN  — Task({ task_id, subagent_type, prompt })
2. UPDATE — TaskUpdate({ taskId, status: 'in_progress', owner: 'router' }) [immediately after spawn]
3. DRAIN  — TaskList() → verify zero in_progress/pending tasks before claiming done

Skipping any phase causes invisible work, stuck tasks, or duplicate execution.


Spawn Template

Every Task() call MUST include a task_id parameter. Missing task_id is hard-blocked by spawn hooks.

Task({
  task_id: 'task-7',
  subagent_type: 'developer',
  prompt: `
## Task ID: task-7
## Agent: developer

### Context
<brief description of what this agent needs to know>

### Objective
<single concrete deliverable>

### Instructions
1. Call TaskUpdate({ taskId: 'task-7', status: 'in_progress' }) IMMEDIATELY.
2. <step-by-step work instructions>
3. Call TaskUpdate({ taskId: 'task-7', status: 'completed', metadata: { summary: '...', filesModified: [...] } }).

### Constraints
- Scope: only files listed above
- Do NOT modify unrelated files
`,
});

Immediate Status Rule

After every Task(...) spawn, immediately call TaskUpdate for that task:

// Spawn the agent
Task({ task_id: 'task-7', subagent_type: 'developer', prompt: '...' });

// Immediately record as in_progress (router-owned until agent picks it up)
TaskUpdate({ taskId: 'task-7', status: 'in_progress', owner: 'router' });

This guarantees task visibility even before the spawned agent emits its first tool call.


Parallel Delegation — Token Budget Limits

NEVER spawn more than 2 heavy agents simultaneously.

Heavy agents: architect, security-architect, code-reviewer, qa, developer, devops Light agents: researcher, general-assistant, technical-writer

// CORRECT: Max 2 heavy agents in parallel
Task({ task_id: 'task-3', subagent_type: 'developer', prompt: '...' });
Task({ task_id: 'task-4', subagent_type: 'qa', prompt: '...' });

// WRONG: 3+ heavy agents causes context overflow
Task({ task_id: 'task-3', subagent_type: 'developer', prompt: '...' });
Task({ task_id: 'task-4', subagent_type: 'qa', prompt: '...' });
Task({ task_id: 'task-5', subagent_type: 'architect', prompt: '...' }); // DO NOT

For 3+ parallel workstreams, use master-orchestrator to manage sequencing.


Handoff Metadata Protocol

Use structured metadata on TaskUpdate(completed) to enable downstream agents to pick up context without re-reading files:

TaskUpdate({
  taskId: 'task-5',
  status: 'completed',
  metadata: {
    summary: 'Implemented JWT auth middleware with refresh tokens',
    filesModified: ['src/middleware/auth.ts', 'src/lib/jwt.ts', 'tests/middleware/auth.test.ts'],
    outputArtifacts: ['.claude/context/plans/auth-design.md'],
    keyDecisions: [
      'Used RS256 (asymmetric) over HS256 for key rotation support',
      'Refresh tokens stored in Redis with 7-day TTL',
    ],
    discoveredFiles: ['src/auth/legacy-session.ts'], // existing code to reuse/replace
    worktreePath: process.env.AGENT_WORKTREE_PATH || process.cwd(),
    completedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
  },
});

Downstream agents read this via TaskGet({ taskId: 'task-5' }):

const task = TaskGet({ taskId: 'task-5' });
const { keyDecisions, filesModified, discoveredFiles } = task.metadata;

Drain Gate (MANDATORY Before Completion)

Before claiming "pipeline complete", execute all drain-gate checks in order:

// Step 1: Task drain
const tasks = TaskList();
const openTasks = tasks.filter(t => ['in_progress', 'pending', 'blocked'].includes(t.status));
if (openTasks.length > 0) {
  // Report open task IDs, continue orchestration
  console.log(
    'Still open:',
    openTasks.map(t => t.id)
  );
}

// Step 2: Reflection queue check
// Read .claude/context/runtime/reflection-spawn-request.json
// If any entries exist with status: 'pending', spawn reflection-agent first

// Step 3: Only after steps 1 and 2 pass — write completion summary

Never claim completion with open tasks or unprocessed reflections.


Model Selection

Task TypeModelRationale
Simple Q&A, research, summarizationhaikuCost-effective, fast
Implementation, bug fixes, testssonnetBalanced capability/cost (default)
Architecture, security review, planningopusHighest reasoning for complex tasks
Orchestrators (master, evolution)opusMust coordinate many subtasks
Context compressionhaikuToken-efficient, low complexity
Task({
  task_id: 'task-8',
  subagent_type: 'security-architect',
  model: 'claude-opus-4-5', // explicit override
  prompt: '...',
});

Model precedence (highest to lowest):

  1. Explicit model: in Task() call
  2. Agent frontmatter model: field
  3. config.yaml agents.{type}.model
  4. Complexity-based default
  5. Fallback: sonnet

Sequential Dependencies

For tasks that must run in order, use addBlockedBy:

TaskCreate({ subject: 'Design auth', taskId: 'task-1' });
TaskCreate({ subject: 'Implement auth', taskId: 'task-2' });
TaskCreate({ subject: 'Test auth', taskId: 'task-3' });

TaskUpdate({ taskId: 'task-2', addBlockedBy: ['task-1'] });
TaskUpdate({ taskId: 'task-3', addBlockedBy: ['task-2'] });

Poll with TaskList() to detect when blocked tasks become unblocked, then spawn the next agent.


Specialist-First Routing (IRON LAW)

Before spawning developer, check if a specialist matches. Developer is the LAST RESORT.

Request TypeCorrect Agent
Update documentationtechnical-writer
Refactor/clean up codecode-simplifier
Review codecode-reviewer
Run tests / QAqa
Deploy / CI / Dockerdevops
Database designdatabase-architect
Research / investigateresearcher
Security-sensitive worksecurity-architect
Debug productiondevops-troubleshooter

Anti-Patterns

  • Never skip task_id — spawn hooks hard-block missing IDs
  • Never claim completion before TaskList() drain — open tasks = invisible work
  • Never spawn 3+ heavy agents in parallel — causes context overflow
  • Never use developer for git commit/push/deploy — always use devops
  • Never spawn reflection-agent with run_in_background: true — breaks atomic handshake
  • Never write multi-fix prompts (4+ fixes per agent) — causes silent failures
  • Never use haiku for security or hooks tasks — use sonnet minimum

INLINE SUMMARY Before TaskUpdate(completed)

Before calling TaskUpdate({ status: 'completed' }), output this block:

IMPLEMENTATION_RESULT:
  summary: <one-line description>
  filesModified:
    - path/to/file1
    - path/to/file2
  testsRun: <command>
  testResult: <PASS/FAIL + counts>
  worktreePath: <AGENT_WORKTREE_PATH or cwd>

The pre-completion-validation.cjs hook reads this block to validate completion.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Ensure accessibility in UI components including semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, and WCAG 2.2 AA compliance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio422026年7月14日 更新

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio422026年7月14日 更新

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio422026年7月14日 更新

Force adversarial code review stance that eliminates confirmation bias — reviewer must find issues or re-analyze

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio422026年7月14日 更新

Creates specialized AI agents on-demand when no existing agent matches a request. Use when the Router cannot find a suitable agent for a task. Enables self-evolution by generating persistent agents.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio422026年7月14日 更新

LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

oimiragieo/agent-studio422026年7月14日 更新

查看 oimiragieo 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题