跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

cowork-hiring-screener

Point Cowork at a folder of resumes plus a job description -- screens every candidate against the actual requirements, produces a ranked shortlist with evidence, drafts advance/decline emails, and builds interview kits for the top picks. Pairs with hiring-scorecard for the interview stage.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Cowork Hiring Screener

Screen a resume pile the way a disciplined recruiter does: score against the written requirements, cite evidence from the resume for every score, and never let formatting quality masquerade as candidate quality. Input is a folder of resumes (PDF, .docx, text) and a job description; output is a defensible shortlist.

Workflow

  1. Extract requirements. Parse the JD into must-haves, nice-to-haves, and disqualifiers. Present the rubric for approval before scoring -- the human may reweight. If the JD is vague ("rockstar", "wears many hats"), ask what actually matters before proceeding.
  2. Inventory. Catalog every file in the folder. Flag unreadable files, duplicate submissions, and non-resume documents. Report the candidate count before starting.
  3. Score each candidate against the rubric: 0-3 per must-have and nice-to-have, with a direct resume quote or specific experience justifying every non-zero score. No quote, no points.
  4. Rank and tier. Produce screening-report.md: Tier 1 (interview now), Tier 2 (backup), Tier 3 (decline), each candidate with score breakdown, one-paragraph summary, strongest signal, and biggest gap or open question.
  5. Draft communications. Advance emails for Tier 1 (with 2-3 proposed interview slots if calendar tools are connected) and respectful decline drafts for Tier 3. Drafts only -- never send.
  6. Interview kits. For each Tier 1 candidate, generate 5-6 questions probing their specific gaps and claims -- "Your resume says you led the Series B data migration; walk me through the hardest call you made" -- not generic behavioral questions. Hand off to hiring-scorecard for structured interview evaluation.

Rules

  • Score the content, not the polish. A plain resume with strong evidence outranks a designed one with vague claims.
  • Never infer or use protected characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, family status, graduation years as an age proxy). Score skills and experience only.
  • Distinguish "did the thing" from "was near the thing." "Led migration" and "team migrated during my tenure" are different scores.
  • Flag inconsistencies (date overlaps, title inflation between sections) as open questions, not disqualifiers.
  • Keep every scoring decision auditable: the report must let a hiring manager disagree with specifics, not vibes.
  • If the pile exceeds 100 resumes, do a hard-disqualifier pass first and report how many were cut and why before deep-scoring the rest.

Quick Commands

  • "Screen [folder] against [JD]" -- full workflow
  • "Just the rubric" -- step 1 only, for approval
  • "Top 5 only" -- deep-score and report only the strongest candidates
  • "Draft the declines" -- Tier 3 communication drafts

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Audit websites for accessibility issues and WCAG compliance. Use when checking accessibility, fixing a11y issues, or ensuring WCAG compliance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OneWave-AI/claude-skills3682026年10月20日 更新

Deploy a 2-layer parallel agent hierarchy for large, parallelizable work — big refactors, multi-file migrations, codebase-wide audits, bulk generation. A top-tier commander (Fable or Opus) orchestrates the swarms; the user picks a power level (Max Power / Heavy / Balanced / Economy) that sets the Opus/Sonnet/Haiku model mix per layer. Layer 1 is 3-50+ specialist agents, each with its own full context window; Layer 2 is 2+ sub-agents per member. Includes git safety, tiered sizing, a pre-deploy gate, phantom-completion checks, and multi-wave follow-up.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OneWave-AI/claude-skills3682026年10月20日 更新

Use to test whether an AI agent, prompt, or skill actually works before or after it ships — build a small eval set, score runs, and catch regressions when the prompt or model changes. Trigger when the user asks whether a prompt is good, wants to compare models or versions, sees inconsistent agent output, or is about to put an agent in front of customers.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OneWave-AI/claude-skills3682026年10月20日 更新

Deploys swarms of sub-agents for massive parallel data processing tasks. Unlike agent-army (which is for code changes), this is for DATA tasks -- processing 1000 documents, analyzing datasets, bulk content generation. Configurable swarm size, task distribution, result aggregation, progress tracking, and error recovery.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OneWave-AI/claude-skills3682026年10月20日 更新

Designs and deploys custom agent teams for specific business workflows. Interactive discovery of business processes, then generates complete team configurations with specialized agent roles, tool access, communication protocols, and handoff rules.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OneWave-AI/claude-skills3682026年10月20日 更新

Agent-to-Agent (A2A) communication protocol. Connect two or more Claude agents that pass messages, share context, delegate tasks, and collaborate. Implements structured handoffs, shared memory, and multi-agent conversations.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OneWave-AI/claude-skills3682026年10月20日 更新

查看 OneWave-AI 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题