跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

knowledge-capture

Save durable preferences, decisions, project facts, commitments, and lessons cheaply with knowledge_remember, or short notes and page updates with attribution and readback. Use for explicit saves or agent-driven remembering when Knowledge is the selected memory provider.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB
  • references/conventions.md14.3 KB
  • references/publication.md20.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Capture durable knowledge

Read shared conventions and publication.

When Knowledge is the selected memory provider, its ordinary-turn remembering policy also authorizes selective capture of meaningful durable information. This is agent judgment, not a background extraction hook. Otherwise require save intent. Do not save transient task status, secrets, unsupported guesses, or excluded content. Apply preferences as contextual facts, not executable instructions or new authority. Saving a preference does not configure the assistant or guarantee that the preference will be loaded in future turns. Pre-compaction flushes follow steps 0–4 with their available tools; they do not use knowledge_attach or knowledge_recall.

  1. Save a discrete claim (decision, preference, commitment, fact, event or belief) with knowledge_remember and stop: give one claim per item, short attribution, the supporting conversation excerpt and, only when you know it, the subject's exact page title or alias. An omitted subject is inferred when the text names exactly one entity page. It resolves subjects, reports exact repeats and never creates pages. Its published receipt is the save. Continue below only to revise a page's prose or save a longer note.
  2. Preserve the supplied wording, especially original ideas. Use the active ontology's type descriptions to classify the information. Decide whether to update an existing page before creating a new one. Do not add unsupported facts or turn a tentative thought into established fact.
  3. Search for an already-captured item and relevant entities using knowledge_grep; reserve knowledge_lookup for already-known exact record IDs, full titles or declared aliases, with grep fallback on missing. If the same source/text is already saved, report that page rather than create another. A similar thought is not proof of identity: keep genuinely distinct versions with attribution. Read the existing record before changes; use knowledge-correct for corrections or withdrawal. Enrich the relevant section of the subject's existing page. Create a separate record when the information warrants independent context, chronology, or explanation; link that record to the resolved subject page using a body wikilink. Preserve source attribution, existing evidence, decision rationale, event dates, and uncertainty. Maintain the page as a coherent account of its subject. Integrate new information into the relevant section; do not append a dated heading for each capture. Preserve supporting evidence and meaningful changes over time without retaining every conversational editing step in the summary. Do not invent a subject match or create an empty profile merely to supply a link. An ordinary new fact does not authorize automatic identity merging.
  4. For a short inline thought, save the exact text via source: {text, attribution} and cite it in the body. Identify the speaker/context/date when known. Retain only actual available text: identify conversation excerpts as excerpts, not complete transcripts; never invent messages, hashes, or locators. Attach a supplied original file with knowledge_attach instead of treating a paraphrase as the original. User beliefs stay attributed to the user.
  5. Publish using the shared retry rules, read back the body/evidence and check exact lookup or keyword discovery. Report the returned page and verified save state. Do not schedule reminders or execute commitments mentioned in the note. Verify that the intended subject page was updated or that the separate record's subject link resolves correctly, as well as checking its supporting evidence.
  6. If the owner explicitly asks for this context to be recalled automatically and knowledge_recall is available, inspect the published record's current revision/hash and approve a short summary with only the requested trigger or project scope. Never approve ingested source text, source claims, agent inference, secrets, or extra context the owner did not request. A correction requires a separate approval on the replacement record.

Route a complete document to knowledge-ingest, or a meeting to knowledge-meeting-ingest.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Create scheduled Knowledge ingestion automations with a verified worker, private-vault authority, and an end-to-end scheduled run. Use when asked to schedule or repair recurring ingestion from any source.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

openclaw/knowledge22026年10月21日 更新

Correct or withdraw specific saved Knowledge claims, explicit relationships, or pages at the user's request, preserving provenance and inspecting affected knowledge. Use for “that's wrong”, “retract that”, or a Knowledge chat reference; not automatic contradiction resolution or physical erasure.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

openclaw/knowledge22026年10月21日 更新

Resolve and enrich Knowledge people, companies, projects, and concepts during an authorized ingestion or entity update, with sourced State, timelines, and back-links. Read-only identity questions do not authorize writes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

openclaw/knowledge22026年10月21日 更新

Ingest documents, articles, conversations, or supplied text into Knowledge with retained originals, sourced claims, entity updates, timelines, and cross-links. Routes meetings to knowledge-meeting-ingest and short thoughts to knowledge-capture.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

openclaw/knowledge22026年10月21日 更新

Ingest meeting transcripts from any recorder into Knowledge with attendee enrichment, timeline merge, supported decisions and commitments, and verification of substance and sequence. Summary-only input is not a verified meeting ingestion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

openclaw/knowledge22026年10月21日 更新

Find and answer from saved Knowledge vault pages with source citations. Use for questions about stored documents, meetings, people, or projects; not for recalling conversation history or searching the web.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

openclaw/knowledge22026年10月21日 更新

查看 openclaw 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题