跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开中文介绍

release-openclaw-maintainer

协助完成OpenClaw测试版、稳定版和长期维护版的准备、发布、恢复及验证,涵盖已批准修复的移植、验证记录、发布后检查和收尾工作。

原文查看原文说明

Prepare, publish, recover, or verify OpenClaw beta, stable, and extended-stable releases, including approved backports.

AI 评分90分/ 100查看安装方法

适用场景

  • 准备OpenClaw测试版和稳定版
  • 将已批准修复移植到长期维护版
  • 恢复中断的发布
  • 验证发布产物并完成收尾

中文介绍

功能

release-openclaw-maintainer负责OpenClaw测试版、稳定版和长期维护版的准备、发布、恢复及验证,也支持将已批准的修复移植到维护分支。它记录待验证代码、产物、发布范围和批准内容,处理测试失败分类、中断发布的恢复、发布后检查及工作整理。

适用场景

适合维护人员跟踪必要验证和发布步骤、恢复失败环节,或向长期维护版引入修复。已完成的验证记录和后续任务会汇总为一份交接记录。

使用示例

  • “准备并验证指定的测试版发布。”
  • “准备将已批准的修复移植到长期维护版。”
  • “恢复中断的发布,并检查已发布产物。”

注意事项

最新政策以docs/reference/RELEASING.md为准。各阶段可能需要相关技能和认证环境;凭据操作使用$one-password。修改版本和不可撤销的发布须明确批准。仅准备不含发布,测试版批准不含升级为稳定版。必要验证不得跳过,已发布版本和最终标签不得更改。公告发布须另获明确许可。

本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。

客观评估

AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。

指令清晰度能否看出何时使用、做什么
A良好明确涵盖发布准备、发布、恢复和验证,并指定各阶段参考资料。
步骤具体性步骤、输入输出和示例是否具体
A良好具体规定必需验证、失败分类、重跑次数上限及交接所需标识信息。
安全性发送数据、删除文件、执行命令等是否有说明
A良好明确版本变更、不可撤销发布及公告的批准范围,并指定凭据操作技能。
安装难易度所需工具和 API 密钥是否少且有说明
B部分不足需要相关技能及认证环境,但所提供片段未包含环境配置步骤。

总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月19日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。

如果您认为评估有误,请申请复核

请写明哪一项有误以及原因。无需登录。我们会对照 SKILL.md 重新评估,并在此处更新结果。

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

包含的文件(12)

  • SKILL.md11.2 KB
  • references/backport-discovery.md8.6 KB
  • references/extended-stable-backports.md19.2 KB
  • references/extended-stable-publish.md10.8 KB
  • references/first-package.md4.7 KB
  • references/platform-publication.md12.0 KB
  • references/preparation.md9.4 KB
  • references/publication-recovery.md17.6 KB
  • references/regular-release.md27.0 KB
  • references/release-handoff-template.md8.5 KB
  • references/stable-main-closeout.md9.6 KB
  • references/validation.md11.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

OpenClaw Release Maintainer

Use for a release operation, not ordinary development or advisory mutation. Read docs/reference/RELEASING.md for current policy. Load $release-private when available before resolving private credential locators or host topology; credential operations use $one-password.

Choose the operation

Read only the references needed for the selected phase:

  • Regular beta/stable preparation or publication: regular release, which routes preparation and phase-specific proof. If the request does not specify stable/full, default to beta; beta authorization does not authorize later stable promotion.
  • Backport discovery: candidate inventory. For extended-stable also read backport preparation; SDK/config changes need a visible maintenance-risk warning and maintainer decision.
  • Extended-stable .33+ Gateway publication: extended-stable publication. Use the shared publisher with extended-stable inputs; its non-Latest GitHub Release carries evidence without native-app or ClawHub publication.
  • Validation selection or failed proof: validation and confidence, with $release-openclaw-ci for workflow execution and immutable manifests.
  • Interrupted publication or registry promotion: publication recovery.
  • Native assets: platform publication, with $release-openclaw-mac for macOS operations.
  • Stable postpublish synchronization and the exact-SHA deployment handoff: main closeout.
  • Release notes: $openclaw-changelog-update, including its separate approved post-release docs-mirror route. Initial release generation keeps its existing format; docs publication does not run automatically during release. Requested announcements: $release-openclaw-announcement for Discord, $release-tweets for X. Announcements never gate publication and require explicit posting authorization.
  • Published artifact verification: $verify-release. GHSA operations: $openclaw-ghsa-maintainer only with explicit security-workflow authorization.

Shared release boundaries

Every selected validation lane must succeed: Windows and macOS Node and other normal CI jobs, install smoke, survivor lanes, update-first-hop-compat*, pack/npm qualification, package integrity, and Linux/Windows/macOS Gateway checks, including Windows packaged install/upgrade checks in Release Checks. A cancelled run still blocks. Preserve first failures and classify each one as below before recovery. Stable publication requires stable/full evidence, soak, and blocking performance. Beta-profile evidence cannot authorize stable publication. No lane or soak waiver can bypass these requirements. All nine Gateway install/upgrade combinations across Linux, Windows, and macOS are required for all-group qualification. Preserve identity, provenance, complete evidence, and existing publication approvals.

Every failed test gets an explicit lead decision, real release blocker or flake, recorded in the handoff with its evidence: the same SHA passing elsewhere or on rerun, no relation to the release delta, a runner or infra signature, a history of the same case flaking, or a pre-existing product bug that is not a regression (for example the 2026.9.6 "Assign to…" bug). A real blocker is a regression in shipped bytes or behavior, or an update/install/ publish defect; fix it on the release branch. Rerun a flake on the same Release SHA with at most two recorded reruns by default, and file a fix-in-parallel issue or PR on main with the evidence. Never re-cut, change tooling, or start a new FRV for a flake. A flake that remains red blocks publication. Main-only failures and infrastructure failures (runner outages, GitHub ghost jobs, hosted-runner offload) count as flakes for the release.

Dependency advisories never delay a release. A newly published advisory is never a reason to re-cut, change tooling, or rerun validation. Record it in the release evidence and handoff, then file or queue the dependency bump on main as a normal follow-up after publication. Only a known-malware finding stops publication. Release dependency evidence and release-dispatched CI enforce this.

Main's CI health never gates a release. Validation and publication run from the release branch plus pinned tooling, so a red main is not a reason to wait, re-cut, or pause. When the release needs a release-tooling fix on main (tooling SHAs must be trusted main commits), main failures the fix does not cause must not hold that landing: prove on a clean main checkout that the failure already exists there, record it in the PR body, and merge. During an active release, an admin merge is allowed for a release-tooling PR in exactly that situation. Red main still gets fixed, in parallel by a separate lane, never on the release's critical path.

The operating objectives are approximately 20 minutes to seal validation and publication within an hour, not measured guarantees. Source-only children start alongside artifact producers; candidate consumers start as soon as the candidate is ready. Independently sealed green children can be reused for the same exact target and inputs even when their parent failed, was cancelled, or remains active; verify their original admitted qualification identity (or historical trusted-main workflow SHA) and current attempt. The sealed manifest supplies the SDK evidence digest and npm publication decisions; it never acknowledges SDK API changes, so supply plugin_sdk_api_acknowledgement whenever the SDK report contains changes. The publisher cannot accept waived validation evidence. Explicit publisher inputs select publication scope; the candidate helper still validates its explicit SDK acknowledgement when needed.

Explicit approval is required for version changes and irreversible publication. A request to cut, publish, or complete a named release carries through its validated publication and verification; do not ask again unless identity, channel, scope, or material risk changes. Ship authority for ordinary code is not release authority.

An operator's explicit approval to do whatever is needed to prepare a named release is standing authority for the necessary preparation decisions and repairs. Carry it through candidate and tooling fixes, upgrade/migration design, reviewed test or security-inventory alignments, isolated proof, commits, pushes, and validation recovery. Record the decision, its evidence, and the selected support contract; do not ask again merely because an already-approved class of work reaches an implementation or verification step. Continue independent work while resolving a blocker. This authority does not permit hiding defects, lowering a gate to manufacture success, destructive changes to operator state, unrelated work, or publication. A prepare-only request still requires a separate publication instruction before releasing artifacts or a bridge version.

Keep one compact state record using the handoff template: effective goal, version/tag/branch, cut/Code/Release SHAs, C/Q/P identities, active parent run and attempt, successful child artifacts, approved changes, phase and next action. Latest operator steering replaces superseded scope. Completed evidence stays complete until a named change invalidates it.

For regular releases, prepare complete notes before freezing Code SHA when possible. If those notes are final, Code SHA and Release SHA are the same commit: one successful fresh full qualification can supply both roles and their exact publication bytes. Do not create another commit or run solely to separate the labels. If notes change after qualification, a descendant whose complete delta includes CHANGELOG/<version>.md (exact beta version or stable base) and only that entry, its matching record, and root index may use split-changelog-release-v1 to reuse product proof while qualifying new publication bytes. Any other source delta, rename, or deletion returns to the Code SHA loop. Historical root-only receipts retain changelog-only-release-v1. New qualification freezes Q=C: the entire qualification workflow closure belongs to the candidate. Keep independently trusted P (admission, verifier, and publisher) separate. A Q harness repair requires a new C/Q and newly bound evidence; P-only or infrastructure repairs can preserve the candidate. Missing qualification contracts need a deliberate backport, never future-main fallback.

Once a candidate is cut, its base is the operator's decision. Never re-cut (re-base the candidate on newer main) unless Peter explicitly asks for it in that release. Without asking, cherry-pick already-merged main commits onto the release branch only to fix a confirmed release blocker: a required lane failing deterministically on the frozen candidate, or an update/install/ publish-bytes defect. Name each cherry-pick in the handoff record. Not allowed: opportunistic backports, feature reverts, or a new base taken to "pick up" a fix that cherry-picks cleanly enough with a small conflict resolution.

Release process improvements made during a release land on both branches. Workflow, release-script, release-test, RELEASING.md, and release-skill changes merge to main first, then get cherry-picked (-x) onto release/YYYY.M.PATCH for the next candidate or patch. A qualification repair needed for this release must land before freezing a new C/Q; never silently swap the harness for an already qualified candidate. Where main-only CI infrastructure is missing on the branch, keep the branch's expression form and port only the logic. Product code on the release branch stays blocker-only per the rule above.

A release is not done while anything opened for it is still open. Before the final report, list every PR created during the release (gh pr list --author @me --state open plus any PR bound to the session) and land or explicitly close each one with a reason; confirm its fix is on main and, when it is release tooling, on the release branch. Also remove the release's temporary worktrees, abandoned local cut branches, and stale scripts/pr worktrees.

Published versions and final tags are immutable. Reuse successful exact-source artifacts; do not rebuild or republish as an implicit retry. The active release is the work queue: no opportunistic moving-main fixes or backports. Classify failures, repair their owner, retry the affected surface, then reassess rather than repeating the full release.

Required publication proofs and enforced environment approvals remain required. A passing sibling cannot replace missing required evidence. npm + ClawHub is the priority path. macOS, Windows, Linux, and Android native publication runs in parallel and never gates npm/ClawHub, GitHub release finalization, or main closeout. Selected Windows Node, Linux/Windows/macOS Gateway, and native-app CI failures block release validation. Platform publishers retain their own artifact and updater contracts; report pending platforms and proof gaps accurately.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

1password

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

检查1Password命令行工具的安装和认证,将已保存的密码或API密钥传入命令及配置。支持桌面应用集成、服务账号和交互式登录,并先验证访问权限。

  • 安装1Password命令行工具
  • 将API密钥传入命令
  • 在CI中使用服务账号认证
openclaw/openclaw39.2万2026年10月18日 更新

acp-router

免费有简介AI 评分 80分

将提交给OpenClaw的自然语言请求转交给Claude Code等外部编程智能体,通过ACP或acpx启动、继续会话,并保留对话上下文。

  • 在讨论串中启动Claude Code
  • 继续外部智能体的现有工作
  • 通过acpx直接传递指令
openclaw/openclaw39.2万2026年10月18日 更新

add-model-provider

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

为OpenClaw添加模型服务商,并通过实际回复验证连接。凭据以环境变量或文件引用的形式配置,同时验证设置并报告测试结果。

  • 为OpenClaw添加模型服务商
  • 通过引用配置认证凭据
  • 确认模型能返回实际回复
openclaw/openclaw39.2万2026年10月18日 更新

agent-transcript

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

将AI代理的工作日志整理为可附在GitHub拉取请求或议题中的记录,筛选相关内容、移除敏感信息,并支持预览及经单独授权后的发布。

  • 为拉取请求整理代理工作记录
  • 从本地日志提取相关请求和结果
  • 预览已移除敏感信息的记录
openclaw/openclaw39.2万2026年10月18日 更新

apple-notes

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

通过代理管理macOS上的Apple Notes笔记,支持创建、查看、搜索、编辑和删除,在文件夹之间移动笔记,并将选定笔记导出为HTML或Markdown。

  • 创建带标题的笔记
  • 按文件夹筛选或模糊搜索笔记
  • 编辑笔记并整理文件夹
openclaw/openclaw39.2万2026年10月18日 更新

apple-reminders

免费有简介AI 评分 70分

通过Mac查看、添加和编辑Apple Reminders中带截止时间的待办事项,管理列表并完成或删除任务,整理在iPhone或iPad上查看的个人任务。

  • 查看今天和已逾期的任务
  • 添加带截止日期的个人待办事项
  • 整理iPhone或iPad上的任务
openclaw/openclaw39.2万2026年10月18日 更新

查看 openclaw 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题