Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Write, review, or restructure Windows node documentation and agent instructions using current source, task-focused explanations, and explicit fact preservation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Use for repository docs, contributor instructions, and skill explanations. A request to audit or plan remains read-only; rewriting requires authorization.
Read documentation ownership, then the target page and the source that owns its claims. Do not preload the entire docs collection.
| Page | First useful result |
|---|---|
| Overview | The reader chooses the appropriate guide |
| Guide | One recommended workflow reaches an observable outcome |
| Reference | A precise contract answers a specific lookup |
| Troubleshooting | A symptom leads to a check, interpretation, and next action |
| Agent instruction | A task routes to its owner, constraints, and required evidence |
State what the page covers and what it does not. Explain the normal path before alternatives. Put prerequisites and safety boundaries before the affected command; place rare cases and exhaustive contracts in named references. Concise means less unnecessary explanation, not an arbitrary word or line cap.
winnode command reference: it is shipped as skill.md
and checked against capability registration. A catalog split is a packaging
change, not an editorial shortcut.For a rewrite or split, use the fact-preservation procedure. Do not turn a documentation request into code cleanup or a repo-wide audit.
Run the existing checks from the repository root:
.\scripts\validate-docs.ps1
.\scripts\validate-agent-skills.ps1
git diff --check
Use test selection for executable changes or shipped command-reference changes. Do not run native runtime proof for ordinary prose changes. Do not claim a command or UI flow was exercised when only its source or documentation was checked.
Report the page's purpose, corrected claims, destinations of moved facts, checks performed, and unresolved claims. Publication needs separate authority.
Windows-owned guidance, informed by the MIT-licensed OpenClaw documentation overlay and refactoring workflow. This is not a synchronized copy. Windows owns its commands, proof requirements, GitHub Markdown conventions, and paired Excalidraw/SVG diagrams.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use Crabbox from macOS, Linux, or native Windows controllers to run OpenClaw Windows node builds, tests, and targeted proof on remote native Windows or WSL2 hosts, including Azure or brokered AWS leases and static SSH hosts. Use when remote Windows validation is needed or the user asks for Crabbox validation. Always report the actual provider, lease id, run URL, command, and result.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Run complete OpenClaw Windows Node issue and PR triage, including landing queues, proof pools, ownership audits, and release planning.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Adversarial dual-model code review that runs two AI models in parallel, cross-references findings, and produces a consensus severity table with fix confidence ratings. Use when asked for a thorough code review, adversarial review, dual-model review, confidence-rated review, or 'Hanselman review'.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Build the native MSIX isolated-session Gateway from npm latest, a published packaging release with -GatewayChannel Packaged, or explicit openclaw sources. Register it beside the Store Gateway and run Companion with OPENCLAW_NATIVE_GATEWAY_DEV_PATCH. Use for native Gateway development, release-channel compatibility, unreleased source changes, or removing a development Gateway.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Plan and collect OpenClaw Windows validation/proof: tests, rubber-duck review, UI evidence, MCP output, and gateway runtime proof.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。